No announcement yet.

This makes my head hurt... Russian military historian blames Poland for WWII

This topic is closed.
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • This makes my head hurt... Russian military historian blames Poland for WWII

    Nothing against the Russian users here, and I sincerely doubt this is a view held by many Russians, and I don't deny every country has their share of disillusion historians, but this is kind of related to the May 20th post about the Kremlin trying to recast history of the Great Patriotic War since it was hosted on the Ministry of Defense Website.

    MOSCOW As the Kremlin presses a campaign to recast Russia's 20th century history in a more favorable light, a research paper published Thursday on the Defense Ministry's Web site blamed Poland for starting World War II.

    The unorthodox reading of history appears to be the latest effort by Russian historians to defend the Soviet Union and its leaders, especially their role in what Russians call the Great Patriotic War. Poland condemned the research paper.

    Russia has angrily rejected claims that a Stalin-era famine in Ukraine amounted to genocide, and Russia's Supreme Court recently turned down an appeal to reopen an investigation into the massacre by Soviet secret police of Polish military officers and intellectuals in Russia's Katyn forest during World War II.

    The generally accepted view is that Poland was a victim rather than the aggressor in the conflict, and that Adolf Hitler's 1939 invasion of Poland marked the start of the war.

    Many Western historians believe Hitler was encouraged to invade by the treaty of nonaggression signed by Moscow and Berlin, called the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, which secretly divided eastern and western Europe into spheres of influence.

    Hitler's pact with the Soviet dictator Josef Stalin was signed on Aug. 24, 1939. Germany invaded Poland Sept. 1.

    Blaming Poland would deny Russia played a role in starting the war by sealing the secret accord.

    The research paper posted on Russia's Defense Ministry Web site is not an official government statement. But the author is listed as Col. Sergei Kovalyov, director of the scientific-research department of military history, part of the Institute of Military History of the Ministry of Defense.

    Ministry spokesman Col. Alexander Drobyshevsky told the Interfax news agency that analytical articles posted on the ministry's Web site do not necessarily reflect the ministry's official position.

    The paper, titled "Fictions and Falsifications in Evaluating the USSR's Role On the Eve of World War II," recounts how in the run-up to Germany's invasion of Poland on Sept. 1, 1939, Hitler demanded that Poland turn over control of the city of Danzig as well as a land corridor between Germany and the territory now known as Kaliningrad.

    "Everyone who has studied the history of World War II without bias knows that the war began because of Poland's refusal to satisfy Germany's claims," he writes.

    Kovalyov called the demands "quite reasonable." He observed: "The overwhelming majority of residents of Danzig, cut off from Germany by the Treaty of Versailles, were Germans who sincerely wished for reunification with their historical homeland."

    Kovalyov, who works in St. Petersburg, could not be immediately located for comment.

    Arseny Roginsky, a historian with the rights group Memorial, said Kovalyov was entitled to his opinion "and he shouldn't be thrown in prison for that."

    "But if this indeed reflects the position of the government in as much that it appeared on the Web site of the Ministry of Defense then this is indeed dangerous and shameful," he said.

    Poland contacted the Russian ambassador in Warsaw for an explanation.

    "This sort of exotic interpretation of historical facts appears in various marginal Russian language periodicals from time to time," Polish Foreign Ministry spokesman Piotr Paszkowski told The Associated Press. "For obvious reasons we don't react. This time, however, we asked the Russian ambassador in Warsaw for an explanation because the materials were posted on an official Web site of the Russian Defense Ministry, which could imply that it is the ministry's official stance."

    Paszkowski said a deputy minister in Poland's Foreign Ministry spoke with the Russian ambassador, and soon after the Russian Defense Ministry posted a statement that the analytical material on the ministry's Web site was not the ministry's official position.

    Paszkowski said Warsaw now considers the issue closed.
    While I don't necessarily disagree with the notion Danzig and the land corridor were probably not happy under polish rule I think its ludicrous to think the Germans would have just been content had it been given to them, especially after Czechoslovakia, and not start a war. Unfortunately this also hurts the image of Russian historiography, many western readers will be more likely to think all Russian historians are crackpot government policy suck ups and go back to their German document based histories of the eastern front.
    Last edited by wokelly; 05 Jun 09, 00:07.

  • #2
    I think for this kind of subjects is enough one topic
    If you fire a rifle at the past, the future will fire a cannon at you.....


    Latest Topics