Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Generals' trial at Nuremberg

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rob Munch
    replied
    Thanks The Ibis. The High Command Trial was what I was after. By the sound of it that book you have referred to looks like the exact thing I was after.

    I am also interested in any books or sources about a later trial of Erich von Manstein. This was in 1949. He was sentenced to 18 years but released after about four for health reasons.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Ibis
    replied
    Originally posted by Rob Munch View Post
    Can anyone direct me to useful sources for the 'Generals' trial' at Nuremberg? These were one of a series of trials against the Nazi leadership, the most famous of which put Goring, Speer, Hess, etc on trial.

    Thanks

    Rob
    The "Generals" or "High Command" trials were actually something a bit different. It sounds like you want to read about the more famous proceeding: the Trial of the Major War Criminals. There are plenty of sources available. Persico's "Nuremberg: Infamy on Trial" is a decent place to start. Also, you can actually read the transcripts if you'd like. They are online at Yale University Law School's website: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/judcont.asp

    If, however, the Generals trials are of interest, check out Valerie Hébert's 2010 book "Hitler's Generals on Trial: The Last War Crimes Tribunal at Nuremberg." http://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-Genera...enerals+trials Here is the Amazon description:

    By prosecuting war crimes, the Nuremberg trials sought to educate West Germans about their criminal past, provoke their total rejection of Nazism, and convert them to democracy. More than all of the other Nuremberg proceedings, the High Command Case against fourteen of Hitler's generals embraced these goals, since the charges--the murder of POWs, the terrorizing of civilians, the extermination of Jews--also implicated the 20 million ordinary Germans who had served in the military. This trial was the true test of Nuremberg's potential to inspire national reflection on Nazi crime.

    Its importance notwithstanding, the High Command Case has been largely neglected by historians. Valerie Hébert's study--the only book in English on the subject--draws extensively on the voluminous trial records to reconstruct these proceedings in full: prosecution and defense strategies; evidence for and against the defendants and the military in general; the intricacies of the judgment; and the complex legal issues raised, such as the defense of superior orders, military necessity, and command responsibility. Crucially, she also examines the West German reaction to the trial and the intense debate over its fairness and legitimacy, ignited by the sentencing of soldiers who were seen by the public as having honorably defended their country.

    Hébert argues that the High Command Trial was itself a success, producing eleven guilty verdicts along with an incontrovertible record of the German military's crimes. But, viewing the trial from beyond the courtroom, she also contends that it made no lasting imprint on the German public's consciousness. And because the United States was eager to secure West Germany as an ally in the Cold War, American officials eventually consented to parole and clemency programs for all of the convicted officers, so that by the late 1950s not one remained imprisoned.

    Superbly researched and impeccably told, Hitler's Generals on Trial addresses fundamental questions concerning the meaning of justice after atrocity and genocide, the moral imperative of punishment for these crimes, the link between justice and memory, and the relevance of the Nuremberg trials for transitional justice processes today. Inasmuch as these trials coined the vocabulary of modern international criminal law and set an agenda for transitional justice that remains in place today, Hébert's book marks a major contribution to military and legal history.
    The New Books in History website also conducted a podcast with Hébert where she discusses her book. You can check that out for free on the website here: http://newbooksinhistory.com/2010/08...-at-nuremberg/
    Last edited by The Ibis; 08 Mar 13, 17:37.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rob Munch
    started a topic Generals' trial at Nuremberg

    Generals' trial at Nuremberg

    Can anyone direct me to useful sources for the 'Generals' trial' at Nuremberg? These were one of a series of trials against the Nazi leadership, the most famous of which put Goring, Speer, Hess, etc on trial.

    Thanks

    Rob

Latest Topics

Collapse

  • G David Bock
    What's Tinier Than a Willys Jeep
    by G David Bock
    What's Tinier Than a Willys Jeep But Just as "Ooh Rah?" The Mighty Mite

    ...........
    What is this, a Jeep for ants? No, it...
    Today, 14:19
  • Massena
    Trump is Wrong Again-Dangerously So
    by Massena
    Trump is living in Dreamland...

    https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/05/polit...ntv/index.html

    The commissioner of the US Food and Drug...
    Today, 12:55
  • lakechampainer
    When you vote, which of the following themes generally help decide your vote?
    by lakechampainer
    When you vote, which of the following themes help you decide whom to vote for?
    I generally vote for members of my party.
    12.50%
    1
    I generally vote for the more conservative candidate.
    25.00%
    2
    I generally vote for the more centrist candidate.
    25.00%
    2
    I generally vote for the more liberal candidate.
    0%
    0
    I generally vote for the incumbent.
    0%
    0
    I generally vote for the non-incumbent.
    0%
    0
    I like to send "message votes".-i.e. vote rep when the dem will win
    12.50%
    1
    I sometimes vote based on race.
    0%
    0
    I sometime vote based on last names.
    0%
    0
    I generally will force myself to vote for major party candidates.
    12.50%
    1
    I generally take military service into account.
    25.00%
    2
    I generally take sex into account.
    0%
    0
    I generally don't vote for candidates from political families.
    50.00%
    4
    I will sometimes vote differently in a primary than a general election (more liberal or conservative, etc.)
    12.50%
    1
    I often vote based upon recommendations of friends and family.
    0%
    0
    I always try to vote, including in local elections.
    37.50%
    3
    I will vote strictly on what I perceive as my own self-interest.
    0%
    0
    I will vote based on what I think is best for my children and grandchildren.
    37.50%
    3
    Today, 09:35
Working...
X