Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Russia stays neutral

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Carl Schwamberg
    replied
    Originally posted by ShAA View Post
    Don't cha know the German side is always to be trusted cause they have a reputation for meticulous record keeping? They even recorded the intentions of the Soviet leadership
    And Buchanan's accuracy is unchallengable as well

    Leave a comment:


  • ShAA
    replied
    Originally posted by Carl Schwamberg View Post
    He probablly has a complete collection of nazi propaganda documents as his proofs. Elsewhere Buchanans book is cited as well.
    Don't cha know the German side is always to be trusted cause they have a reputation for meticulous record keeping? They even recorded the intentions of the Soviet leadership

    Leave a comment:


  • Carl Schwamberg
    replied
    Originally posted by ShAA View Post
    Any solid proof to this statement? I'm sure you can come up with a good conspiracy theory, though.
    He probablly has a complete collection of nazi propaganda documents as his proofs. Elsewhere Buchanans book is cited as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • ShAA
    replied
    Originally posted by Destroyer25 View Post
    Well Russia was planning on invading Germany in late 1941. But had they stayed neutral GB would be screwed.
    Any solid proof to this statement? I'm sure you can come up with a good conspiracy theory, though.

    Leave a comment:


  • ShAA
    replied
    Originally posted by Exorcist View Post
    Remember, the only treaty Stalin didn't break was the one that Hitler beat him too it with Barbarossa.


    Read some history books, man - not just the "Red Primer for brain-dead wingnuts".

    Leave a comment:


  • D1J1
    replied
    I don't like Stalin, but I don't think he is an idiot. Other issues aside I think he knows the nazis are enemy #1. At best he fluctuates but in the end must side against hitler. What that means for the west is worse than what we got historically, but still better than nazi domination.

    You really don't think hitler would have kept a treaty do you?

    Regards,
    Dennis

    Leave a comment:


  • nastle
    replied
    ^ in my opinion that would have been the best scenario ...and US shud have sided with germany

    world powers USA , germany and USSR ( and i hope the russians got rid of the asiatic part of USSR )


    btw anyone read Mr Buchanans
    's book "how west lost the world "

    awesome analysis of why US intervention in both WWs was useless and only served to weaken the western world

    Leave a comment:


  • Heidi
    replied
    Russia on germanys side for 6 years of the war,it would have been a win for germany and russia.

    germany would have alll those extra men to man there equitment and oil to move the german army.

    Leave a comment:


  • Destroyer25
    replied
    The entire German army concentrated in France? Dude that's like 5000 Panzers and 5 million men. Not to mention the strong Luftwaffe presence there would be.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bwaha
    replied
    Not necessarily, Lets say that Japan brings the US in on time and Hitler DOWs the US. Without shipping material to Russia the Brits are doing fine. So if the Brits aren't hurting as far as food or the tools of war, would Overlord would have worked?

    Leave a comment:


  • Destroyer25
    replied
    Well Russia was planning on invading Germany in late 1941. But had they stayed neutral GB would be screwed.

    Leave a comment:


  • For the Fallen
    replied
    Originally posted by Bwaha View Post
    Yeah but if France and England had fought Russia over Finland that would be a real game changer.

    The question still remains, do you think we could have won without Russia?

    nope. i don't believe the US would have been ready to accept the losses necessary to beat the Axis. with no US involvement, Britain for all her qualities and fighting spirit, would have sued for peace.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bwaha
    replied
    Yeah but if France and England had fought Russia over Finland that would be a real game changer.

    The question still remains, do you think we could have won without Russia?

    Leave a comment:


  • The Exorcist
    replied
    Maybe WW3 would have started the day after WW2 ended, if they had.

    I don't see this alliance working very long. Remember, the only treaty Stalin didn't break was the one that Hitler beat him too it with Barbarossa.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bwaha
    started a topic Russia stays neutral

    Russia stays neutral

    During the beginning of the winter war, (Finland) France wanted to reinforce the Finns. This could have lead to the USSR being an belligerent against the Allies. Now I think we would have lost WW2 if the Russians joined the Axis powers.

    But what if the Russians just stayed neutral?

    If Hitler knew that the Russian were angry with the west would he attack them?

    If Stalin kept shipping Germany oil and the other resources of war, would the strategic air war have worked?



    What do you think?

Latest Topics

Collapse

Working...
X