Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Siberia invaded by the Japanese

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Carl Schwamberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Ace_General View Post
    Weren't the germans equipping the Nationalist chinese in the 30's and early 40's
    A little. They equipped and trained a corps, part of a forigen military aid program. They had similar projects in many other nations like Brazil. In the case of China the aid was ceased when Hitler realized Japan was needed as a ally. The USSR may have sent more aid to the Nationalist government during the same time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Legate
    replied
    Originally posted by Ace_General View Post
    So the U.S. don't go to war with them so quick. I mean, germany wouldn't be fighting the U.S. Cause of pearl Harbor.

    Weren't the germans equipping the Nationalist chinese in the 30's and early 40's

    It worked in Hearts of Iron


    Sgt. Ace_General
    By this time the German-Jap. alliance,such as it was, was in full swing,China wouldn't be worth the Germans efforts. With the loss of Vladistock, would that hamper the lend-lease deal?

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    So the U.S. don't go to war with them so quick. I mean, germany wouldn't be fighting the U.S. Cause of pearl Harbor.

    Weren't the germans equipping the Nationalist chinese in the 30's and early 40's

    It worked in Hearts of Iron


    Sgt. Ace_General

    Leave a comment:


  • Skoblin
    replied
    Originally posted by Full Monty View Post
    The implications for the British/Commonwealth forces are significant too. Assets originally deployed to the Far East can instead be kept in the ETO/North Africa/Atlantic making the short term situation for the Axis forces, especially in the Med, far more difficult.
    I am sure that if Japan was at war with Russia and Japan was allied with Germany, Stalin would expect the British to offer at least some token show of force against the Japanese....perhaps some naval assets....such as the Prince of Wales and the Repulse. But...let's add to this...the Japanese also attack Hong Kong...since the Japanese navy would serve little purpose in the war against Russia, except in assisting the capture of Vladivostok. And let's suggest the Japanese navy also makes an invasion of the Dutch East Indies in order to secure oil supplies. No attack is made on the US. Does the US get involved? A summertime attack on Russia to tie up Soviet reserves in the Far East. The German attack on Moscow still peters out. But the Soviet counter-offensive is much weaker. The German 9th, 4th and 2 panzer armies suffer much less losses. The German position in front of Moscow suffers less of a serious dent. Do the Germans still head south in 1942? Does the stronger German position in front of Moscow compel Hitler to capture the capital in 1942?


    Originally posted by Ace_General View Post
    Well, lets think of this, what if Germany didn't ally Japan, but actually allied Nationalist china and delcared war on the Japanese.
    Why would Germany ally itself with the Nationalist Chinese? Not sure what benefit they would have gained.
    Last edited by Skoblin; 26 Aug 08, 09:16.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Well, lets think of this, what if Germany didn't ally Japan, but actually allied Nationalist china and delcared war on the Japanese.

    Leave a comment:


  • Full Monty
    replied
    Originally posted by skoblin View Post
    That was an overly subtle implication of the original proposition
    The implications for the British/Commonwealth forces are significant too. Assets originally deployed to the Far East can instead be kept in the ETO/North Africa/Atlantic making the short term situation for the Axis forces, especially in the Med, far more difficult.

    Leave a comment:


  • johnbryan
    replied
    Originally posted by Full Monty View Post
    cs has already mentioned the idea that a Japanese offensive might prevent the Soviets moving their experienced divisions away from Siberia thus affecting the Battle of Moscow. But the effect on the campaign in European USSR would hardly be decisive since the Germans had already been forced onto the defensive. The fighting around Moscow may have been easier on the Germans but then Stalin may not have gotten carried away with the more limited success and thus not insisted on overstretching the Red Army in a series of engagements that failed to destroy the German armies as intended. In all likelihood a Japanese attack on the USSR would only have hastened their final defeat.

    Caveat: If the Japanese went with this strategy instead of attacking Pearl Harbour how long would it have been before the US actually joined the war?
    For my money, not likely after what the Soviets had already done to the Japanese in 1939. Khalklingol was not a lesson that would be quickly forgotten, even for the toadying minions of Joseph Stalin.

    Leave a comment:


  • Skoblin
    replied
    Originally posted by Full Monty View Post
    Caveat: If the Japanese went with this strategy instead of attacking Pearl Harbour how long would it have been before the US actually joined the war?
    That was an overly subtle implication of the original proposition

    Leave a comment:


  • Full Monty
    replied
    cs has already mentioned the idea that a Japanese offensive might prevent the Soviets moving their experienced divisions away from Siberia thus affecting the Battle of Moscow. But the effect on the campaign in European USSR would hardly be decisive since the Germans had already been forced onto the defensive. The fighting around Moscow may have been easier on the Germans but then Stalin may not have gotten carried away with the more limited success and thus not insisted on overstretching the Red Army in a series of engagements that failed to destroy the German armies as intended. In all likelihood a Japanese attack on the USSR would only have hastened their final defeat.

    Caveat: If the Japanese went with this strategy instead of attacking Pearl Harbour how long would it have been before the US actually joined the war?

    Leave a comment:


  • johnbryan
    replied
    Originally posted by Full Monty View Post
    Based on what happened at Khalkhin-Gol I don't see the Japanese enjoying much success, at least of a lasting nature. Even if they manage to inflict a serious defeat on Soviet forces in Siberia they don't have the logistics to exploit it.
    Agreed. It would be remarkably easy for the Soviets to tear up the tracks of the Trans-Siberian Railroad and allow the Japanese Invaders to simply wallow in the trackless, swamp wastes and pine barrens of that region. Mosquito repellant would be worth its weight in gold.

    Leave a comment:


  • Full Monty
    replied
    Based on what happened at Khalkhin-Gol I don't see the Japanese enjoying much success, at least of a lasting nature. Even if they manage to inflict a serious defeat on Soviet forces in Siberia they don't have the logistics to exploit it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Legate
    replied
    Originally posted by captainsennef View Post
    Mind you, they were already in Korea and Manchuria.
    The so called 'Northern school' (mainly popular in the army) saw a future for Japan in this direction.
    Quite right,IIRC the army was more interesed in the north while the navy wanted to expand through the Southern Pacific,I guess we know who won that arguement I do think that an Japanese attack would have been disasterous for the USSR. While the JA's armor is not as good as Soviet armor,the soldiers are very good,underrated IMHO, and Japan's airpower was far supeiror to the Red AF. Also let's not forget the loss of raw materials the Soviets would face.

    Leave a comment:


  • Colonel Sennef
    replied
    Originally posted by Ace_General View Post
    Huh, I don't think the japs would be interested in ice and polar bears and whatnot, and the japs would run out of supplies and freeze to death before they got anywhere

    Sgt. Ace_General
    Mind you, they were already in Korea and Manchuria.
    The so called 'Northern school' (mainly popular in the army) saw a future for Japan in this direction.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Huh, I don't think the japs would be interested in ice and polar bears and whatnot, and the japs would run out of supplies and freeze to death before they got anywhere

    Sgt. Ace_General

    Leave a comment:


  • Legate
    replied
    Originally posted by skoblin View Post
    OK. December 1941. Japan decides to attack Russia. How does this affect the Soviet defense in European Russia? How long until Japan runs into severe oil supply problems?
    Does Japan still attack the US in this scenario?

    Leave a comment:

Latest Topics

Collapse

Working...
X