Announcement

Collapse

New Site - PLEASE READ

Hello All,
My name is Ashley and I am the one that moved the forum to its new hosting location. This was done for security reasons and try to keep the forum from going down every other day. I understand that the new forum looks very different from the old one but I promise almost everything you had before you still have it might just be in a different place.

Items that are gone due to a limitation of the new hosting/ forum update:
- Awards
- Flags

As I was going thought your posts I was able to fix a lot fo the issues you were listing. Below is kind of a running list of issues an what is fixed and what I am still working on.

Items that I have fixed from your comments:
- Smilie are now working.
- Color/Theme changes
- Signature are now showing up. (Here is how to edit them https://screencast.com/t/OJHzzhiV1)
- Ranking is now showing up.
- Private messaging is now working.

Some issues I am still working on are:
- Missing items from the Calendar
- Like button the posts is giving an error.

One other note I have seen a lot is theme/color related items. I know this is important to all of you but at the moment the most important thing was getting you back a functioning forum with as many features I can get you back from before.

Theme/color is something we can change but it the moment I do not have the time and resources to fix all of the issue and design the site. I did do some theme updates yesterday but it is very time consuming. Please just be patient with the forum as we get it back to as close as I can to what you had before.

If anyone has any issues that they are running in to please let me know in the post below. Please give me as much detail as possible .
https://forums.armchairgeneral.com/forum/world-history-group-welcomes-you/armchair-general-magazine/5034776-new-site-please-read
See more
See less

Mythification of WW2 german military

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I would think that the failure of France was a combination of their ineptness of its leaders at the top combined with a superior German operational and tactical doctrine. General Jules Decamp once told Daladier "Gamelin is a smart man, well educated, well versed in conversation. In short he possesses all the characteristics of a great military leader-except backbone"

    "Order in Chaos", Hermann Balck page 193-

    Gamelin could not bring himself contrary to his convictions to say no clearly, which then bought about France's decision to enter the war. General Weygrand later opined that in 1939 the war was entered irresponsibly, without material, and without doctrine.

    The same was true of French military leadership, vague and unclear. The army was administered, but not led. An army that is administered and not shaped by the hand of a strong leader and imbued with his spirit to the last man bears the seed of its own destruction. French defense administration was pathetic as well. France spent billions on fortifications and the maintenance of obsolescent equipment, instead of putting the money into modern armaments. The Maginot attitude "defense at any cost" had led the thinking within the French Army in the wrong direction. Forgotten was the warning "On ne perd que par la defense" (one only loses in the defense). Forgotten were the words of Marshall Foch, who had adopted Fredrick the Greats concept of "attaquez donc toujours"(always attack). As a result, an army marched into a battlefield poorly equipped, poorly led, without political direction and consequently without operational goals, and with people who did not comprehend the reason for war. The French approach then, was the very antithesis of Guderians famous principle "Nicht kleckern sondern klotzen" (do not dribble-pour).
    Regards,Kurt
    Our world at Khe Sanh was blood, death, and filth with deafening gunfire and blinding explosions as a constant soundtrack...Barry Fixler
    http://sempercool.com/

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Kurt Knispel View Post
      I would think that the failure of France was a combination of their ineptness of its leaders at the top combined with a superior German operational and tactical doctrine. General Jules Decamp once told Daladier "Gamelin is a smart man, well educated, well versed in conversation. In short he possesses all the characteristics of a great military leader-except backbone"

      "Order in Chaos", Hermann Balck page 193-



      Regards,Kurt
      The Balck quotation is very ,very questionable : would everything that Balck was claiming and everything that happened in may not have happened if Gamelin was not chief of sttaff ?

      Weygand had backbone and he could not save the situation .

      Saying : it is the fault of Gamelin, is saying : with some one else, this would not happen .

      The Belgian and Dutch chiefs of staff were replaced shortly before Fall Gelb, but this did not save their countries . In 1938 Fritsch and Beck were going ;if they had remained, would the outcome of Fall Gelb be different ?

      When Auchinleck was fired in 1942 ,Gott was chosen as chief of 8th Army, but he died in an air accident and Montgomery came . If Gott had survived ,would the outcome of the war in NA have been different ?

      The influence of generals on the outcome of a battle is much exaggerated: their influence is very limited . A general is as a football coach : if the team is not good, the coach can not save the situation : when Liverpool lost (by 5-0 ) from MUT,Klopp will be blamed, wrongly, the only to be blamed are the players of MUT .

      Even with an other commander, France would have lost, or better: Germany would have won .

      I am also very sceptical that Germany had a superior operational and tactical doctrine : they had an other doctrine and I doubt that this doctrine would fit for the Allies, because the Allies were defending themselves,while the Germans were attacking .

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Kurt Knispel View Post
        I would think that the failure of France was a combination of their ineptness of its leaders at the top combined with a superior German operational and tactical doctrine. General Jules Decamp once told Daladier "Gamelin is a smart man, well educated, well versed in conversation. In short he possesses all the characteristics of a great military leader-except backbone"

        "Order in Chaos", Hermann Balck page 193-



        Regards,Kurt
        Kurt, I always enjoy your contributions. lcm1
        'By Horse by Tram'.


        I was in when they needed 'em,not feeded 'em.
        " Youuu 'Orrible Lot!"

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Nick the Noodle View Post
          I was thinking of smaller units, ie squadron size, as my example clearly reveals.
          Ah, ok. Regarding tank squadrons it's pretty simple. Shermans were produced in plenty different variants when T-34 existed only in 76 mm and 85 mm versions.
          There are no Nazis in Ukraine. Idiots

          Comment


          • It should be noted that up to and including 1942, the Germans had the best army in the world, period. This was due to the following:

            After the Versailles Treaty, the Heer was limited to a mere hundred thousand souls, and of course they kept the best. This created a core of experts that studied the potential defense of Germany from their historical enemies - France, Denmark, Sweden, Italy, Poland and the Austro-Hungarians. Because it was possible to be engaged in a war with one, another could take advantage and attack from the rear, thus German armies always needed quick decisive victories, and planned for such.

            The Germans studied military problems in far greater depth, and quickly understood, that a mobile army would need to be motorized and wheeled, or at least the shock elements need to be. They also realised the necessity of radios, and other comms, to join up different elements, and the Luftwaffe could have 'divisions' within a Corps.

            When Hitler came to power, the military suddenly got both finance and fanatical recruits to create a formidable army. Then they got around 3 years of being able to invade other peoples countries without actually fighting. This is important, because officer can actually concentrate on the combat, because other essential tasks are already second nature to them.

            So with both theoretical and practical expertise amongst the officers, fanatical soldiers and prioritized funding from the government, it is no wonder that the Heer was as formidable as it was. At first, both the East and West tried to emulate the Heer but failed. Instead they had to learn to play to their strengths instead, which really started to happen late 42 onwards.
            How to Talk to a Climate Skeptic: http://grist.org/series/skeptics/
            Global Warming & Climate Change Myths: https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php

            Comment


            • Regarding "German invincibility", they didn't always have it their own way, for example would ya believe in France 1940 that the Brits attacked with Matildas and made SS-Totenkopf panic, how kool is that!..

              Guderian quote from 'Panzer Leader' page 114-
              "On the 21st of May a noteworthy event occurred to the north of us: English tanks attempted to break through in the direction of Paris.
              At Arras they came up against the SS Division Totenkopf which had not been in action before and which showed signs of panic"


              Below- Heavy metal! The Matilda II was slow but built like a fortress, and had the excellent (for 1940) 2-pdr gun-

              http://www.mission4today.com/index.p...iewforum&f=134
              Last edited by RichardS; 13 Sep 17, 19:11.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Emtos View Post
                Ah, ok. Regarding tank squadrons it's pretty simple. Shermans were produced in plenty different variants when T-34 existed only in 76 mm and 85 mm versions.
                Actually I think you will find that is wrong about the T34.
                See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-34_variants
                T34M40
                T34M41
                T34M42
                T34M43
                OT34
                T34M
                T34-57
                T34-85
                OT34-85

                Comment


                • Originally posted by lcm1 View Post
                  I cannot imagine either of those gentlemen standing in a queue up to there chests in sea water I'm afraid, I can only see them leaving in a far more graceful manner, a little bit of the sands of Dunkirk on there boots perhaps but that is about all. lcm1
                  I cannot argue that lcm1 The details of the specific manner in which both the gentlemen left Dunkirk is not recorded in my reading matter. Most likely they boarded a ship that was alongside the mole.

                  The repetition of affirmations leads to belief. Once that belief becomes a deep conviction, you better wake up and look at the facts.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Nick the Noodle View Post
                    Just pointing out that the BEF was only well equipped on paper. Tanks were not just going into action without ammo, but in some cases without guns as well.
                    I have no doubt that there is truth in your statement.
                    There is also the strange case that during the evacuation, albeit not from Dunkirk as such: A tank transporter cpl with tank were shipped back to Blighty. Which makes me wonder if that was worth so much more than carrying an extra number of men instead.
                    Last edited by dutched; 13 Sep 17, 18:16.
                    The repetition of affirmations leads to belief. Once that belief becomes a deep conviction, you better wake up and look at the facts.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by ljadw View Post
                      There was a queue of abandoned lorries that was stretching out to Belgium ,not just outside of Dunkirk .
                      Of course there was and as you well know Dunkirk is not that far from Belgium. 10 km (6 mls) if I am correct. On foot that would be a two hour walk
                      The repetition of affirmations leads to belief. Once that belief becomes a deep conviction, you better wake up and look at the facts.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by AdrianE View Post
                        Actually I think you will find that is wrong about the T34.
                        See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-34_variants
                        T34M40
                        T34M41
                        T34M42
                        T34M43
                        OT34
                        T34M
                        T34-57
                        T34-85
                        OT34-85
                        You should read more in detail instead of simply pasting. T-34M was a prototype, not a serial produced tank. 40,41,42 and 43 versions were all similar and equipped with a 76 mm gun, similar armor and mobility. OT-34 and OT-34-85 were flamme tanks. Finally T-34-57 were produced in two short series. So, as I said the two variants present in tank units were the tanks with 76 mm and 85 mm guns. Shermans on the other side get at least four versions employed in tank units: with 75 mm, 76,2 mm, 105 mm and 17 pdr guns.
                        There are no Nazis in Ukraine. Idiots

                        Comment


                        • Still on the theme of German "invincibility", it took another knock when the panzers first encountered Russian T-34's in 1941:-

                          German battle report, Finkel, June 23rd 1941-
                          "Half a dozen anti-tank guns fire shells at him (T-34)..but he drives staunchly through our line like an impregnable prehistoric monster... Lt Steup's tank [Pz III short 50mm] made hits on a T-34 once at 20 metres and 4 times at 50 metres without any noticeable effect"
                          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_...4_and_KV_tanks

                          Guderian writes in 'Panzer Leader' page 162 (July 3rd 1941) about his panzergruppes first encounter with T-34's-
                          "..an attack by Russian tanks and aircraft on the Beresina crossing at Borissov...here for the first time the enemy deployed his T-34 tank against which our guns at that time were largely ineffective"


                          Below- the T-34/76 ruled the roost in Russia for about 9 months from the German invasion in June 41 until spring 1942 when upgunned Panzer IV's began arriving-


                          http://www.mission4today.com/index.p...iewforum&f=134
                          Last edited by RichardS; 14 Sep 17, 09:39. Reason: Please place large images under a spoiler-ACG staff.

                          Comment


                          • I think the picture shows a later model T-34 with a longer 76mm main gun. Even the shorter gun penetrated all German tanks. Also I doubt they had Tank Riders with PPSh's during the initial invasion. That came later.

                            Pruitt
                            Pruitt, you are truly an expert! Kelt06

                            Have you been struck by the jawbone of an ASS lately?

                            by Khepesh "This is the logic of Pruitt"

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by dutched View Post
                              Of course there was and as you well know Dunkirk is not that far from Belgium. 10 km (6 mls) if I am correct. On foot that would be a two hour walk
                              We could do 4Mls an hour as an afternoon stroll 5 as a forced march ( which involves jogging on flat ) depending on the terrain But there we were 'Bootnecks' need I say more? lcm1......( And anyone who takes offence at this, has no sense of Humour. )
                              'By Horse by Tram'.


                              I was in when they needed 'em,not feeded 'em.
                              " Youuu 'Orrible Lot!"

                              Comment


                              • [QUOTE=lcm1;3403916]We could do 4Mls an hour as an afternoon stroll 5 as a forced march ( which involves jogging on flat ) depending on the terrain But there we were 'Bootnecks' need I say more? lcm1......( And anyone who takes offence at this, has no sense of Humour. : )
                                'By Horse by Tram'.


                                I was in when they needed 'em,not feeded 'em.
                                " Youuu 'Orrible Lot!"

                                Comment

                                Latest Topics

                                Collapse

                                Working...
                                X