Originally posted by deterrumeversor
View Post
It was easier for the Finns to maintain better morale, better cohesion, better leadership and better equipment since they were mostly static in good defensive positions. The Romanian army went all the way to Stalingrad, hence its morale, cohesion, leadership and equipment (already defficient) had plenty of chances to get seriously attritioned.
Thus, I don't think the usefulness of the two armies should be judged based on the state of their morale, cohesion and leadership since they faced two radically different conditions.
As for morale in Romania, I don't have exact info on this but I think it only plummeted after Stalingrad.
Comment