Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pentagon Confident It Could Intercept an Iranian Missile

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pentagon Confident It Could Intercept an Iranian Missile

    The defensive missile shield creates jusy enough doubt in the mind of an aggressor that any limited first strike can be negated. That doubt coupled with the certainty of a massive retaliatory strike in kind should provide an effetive deterrent.


    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...anian-missile/

    Pentagon Confident It Could Intercept an Iranian Missile

    Associated Press


    The Pentagon is "very confident" that it could defend the United States against the threat of an Iranian ballistic missile strike, the Defense Department's chief spokesman said Wednesday.


    The Pentagon is "very confident" that it could defend the United States against the threat of an Iranian ballistic missile strike, the Defense Department's chief spokesman said Wednesday.

    A recent Defense Department report to Congress concludes that Iran could develop a missile capable of striking the United States by 2015. Iran already has the largest deployed ballistic missile force in the Middle East, comprising about 1,000 missiles capable of hitting targets up to 1,200 miles (1930 kilometers) away, the report warns.

    The United States has 25 long-range interceptor missiles based in Alaska and California, as part of a system designed to defend the nation against an attack from North Korea or Iran.

    Eight of 14 tests of the interceptors have been successful, while the remaining tests suffered software glitches and other technical problems. But U.S. officials say the system should still work in the event of an attack.

    "We are confident that the system we have in place right now, the (ground-based interceptors) that are based in Alaska and California, are sufficient to protect us from such a threat coming in from Iran and North Korea," Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said.

    The United States is concerned increasingly about Iran's missile program, particularly because Washington believes that Tehran is moving toward building a nuclear weapon.

    Officials in particular fear that Iran could retaliate against any attack by the United States by targeting its missiles on American troops deployed in Iraq or Afghanistan.

    Michele Flournoy, a senior Pentagon policy adviser, told reporters in Singapore on Wednesday that a military strike against Iran is an option of "last resort" and "off the table in the near term" as Washington pursues economic sanctions.

    Morrell said Flournoy's comments should not be interpreted as a shift in strategy.

    "It clearly is not our preference to go to war with Iran, to engage militarily with Iran," he said. But "there is always the option at the president's disposal of taking military action."

  • #2
    The average American does not want to intercept an Iranian missiles. The average American wants to kick Ahmenijad's ass in a way that's most embarrassing to the Islamist-radicals. But how do we do it?

    "Artillery adds dignity to what would otherwise be a ugly brawl."
    --Frederick II, King of Prussia

    Comment

    Latest Topics

    Collapse

    Working...
    X