Announcement

Collapse

New Site - PLEASE READ

Hello All,
My name is Ashley and I am the one that moved the forum to its new hosting location. This was done for security reasons and try to keep the forum from going down every other day. I understand that the new forum looks very different from the old one but I promise almost everything you had before you still have it might just be in a different place.

Items that are gone due to a limitation of the new hosting/ forum update:
- Awards
- Flags

As I was going thought your posts I was able to fix a lot fo the issues you were listing. Below is kind of a running list of issues an what is fixed and what I am still working on.

Items that I have fixed from your comments:
- Smilie are now working.
- Color/Theme changes
- Signature are now showing up. (Here is how to edit them https://screencast.com/t/OJHzzhiV1)
- Ranking is now showing up.
- Private messaging is now working.

Some issues I am still working on are:
- Missing items from the Calendar
- Like button the posts is giving an error.

One other note I have seen a lot is theme/color related items. I know this is important to all of you but at the moment the most important thing was getting you back a functioning forum with as many features I can get you back from before.

Theme/color is something we can change but it the moment I do not have the time and resources to fix all of the issue and design the site. I did do some theme updates yesterday but it is very time consuming. Please just be patient with the forum as we get it back to as close as I can to what you had before.

If anyone has any issues that they are running in to please let me know in the post below. Please give me as much detail as possible .
https://forums.armchairgeneral.com/forum/world-history-group-welcomes-you/armchair-general-magazine/5034776-new-site-please-read
See more
See less

Navy successfully tests new missile defense system.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Navy successfully tests new missile defense system.



    U.S. forces completed the successful test of a next-generation defense system, by knocking out an incoming ballistic missile near Hawaii on Wednesday.
    The Navy’s interceptor program is designed to protect the U.S. and its allies from potential missile attacks from the likes of Iran and North Korea.
    "This next-generation variant of the SM-3 is critical to the ballistic missile defense of the U.S. and our allies, because it can defeat the more sophisticated threats emerging around the world today," said Dr. Taylor Lawrence, Raytheon Missile Systems president.


    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/...#ixzz1uUWjtIX2
    Credo quia absurdum.


    Quantum mechanics describes nature as absurd from the point of view of common sense. And yet it fully agrees with experiment. So I hope you can accept nature as She is - absurd! - Richard Feynman

  • #2
    How often do these tests "fail"?

    Pruitt
    Pruitt, you are truly an expert! Kelt06

    Have you been struck by the jawbone of an ASS lately?

    by Khepesh "This is the logic of Pruitt"

    Comment


    • #3
      I'm not certain, I think that we're at 50% kill rate.

      But its better than crawling under your desk and waiting for the boom...

      Credo quia absurdum.


      Quantum mechanics describes nature as absurd from the point of view of common sense. And yet it fully agrees with experiment. So I hope you can accept nature as She is - absurd! - Richard Feynman

      Comment


      • #4
        Interesting, they've successfully integrated the SM-3 with the Army's THAAD radar and fire control,architecture. Not to nitpick, but I believe this is going to be operated by the Army, not the Navy.
        There is another related program called AEGIS Ashore which uses the SM-3 and the SPY-1 radar used on DDGs and CGs which will constitute the land-based BMD component in Europe. Nice to know there's an,alternative sitting in the wings.

        Comment


        • #5
          the THAAD radar is a x-band AESA and by rights should be a far superior tracking and engagement radar than the current AEGIS set-up. Just the type of radar you want for this type of job...

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by kuma View Post
            Interesting, they've successfully integrated the SM-3 with the Army's THAAD radar and fire control,architecture. Not to nitpick, but I believe this is going to be operated by the Army, not the Navy.
            There is another related program called AEGIS Ashore which uses the SM-3 and the SPY-1 radar used on DDGs and CGs which will constitute the land-based BMD component in Europe. Nice to know there's an,alternative sitting in the wings.
            Speaking as the Aegis Sailor here Kuma this has nothing to do with the THAAD system and it is certainly not going to be operated by the Army. It will be operated by the Navy FC rating. The big problem with Aegis Ashore is that it can cause a bid red ass with our Russian buddies and that is why the program in Europe is very much ship centric.
            Give me a fast ship and the wind at my back for I intend to sail in harms way! (John Paul Jones)

            Initiated Chief Petty Officer
            Hard core! Old School! Deal with it!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Bass_Man86 View Post
              Speaking as the Aegis Sailor here Kuma this has nothing to do with the THAAD system and it is certainly not going to be operated by the Army. It will be operated by the Navy FC rating. The big problem with Aegis Ashore is that it can cause a bid red ass with our Russian buddies and that is why the program in Europe is very much ship centric.
              ..as i think it should Chief, much more flexible that way and also avoids giving Putin ammunition to hit over the head repeatedly Western defence chiefs too....

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Galland View Post
                ..as i think it should Chief, much more flexible that way and also avoids giving Putin ammunition to hit over the head repeatedly Western defence chiefs too....
                Ah yes, our boy Vlad Darren; he is quite a chap is he not? Stalin light? Every time that I feel bad about American politicians all I have to do is think about guys like Vlad and Hugo and I thank God for the Constitution.
                Give me a fast ship and the wind at my back for I intend to sail in harms way! (John Paul Jones)

                Initiated Chief Petty Officer
                Hard core! Old School! Deal with it!

                Comment


                • #9
                  ...interesting though, see that video in the first post gives you an idea of what your typical THAAD battery is composed of.

                  ...here is what your typical S-300 SAM unit has for comparison...

                  S-300 towed TEL unit..



                  ...command post...



                  Tomb Stone engagement radar...



                  Big Bird Acquisition radar...



                  ..site survey vehicle...



                  ..missile transporter...



                  ...missile transloader...



                  ....funny but the more i look at all that, the more i think that they really aren't that "mobile" a SAM system if you have to move all the above at once with you every time you "scoot and shoot"...!!!

                  http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-S-300PMU2-Favorit.html
                  Last edited by Galland; 11 May 12, 05:29. Reason: ..added the supporting website address.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Bass_Man86 View Post
                    Speaking as the Aegis Sailor here Kuma this has nothing to do with the THAAD system and it is certainly not going to be operated by the Army. It will be operated by the Navy FC rating. The big problem with Aegis Ashore is that it can cause a bid red ass with our Russian buddies and that is why the program in Europe is very much ship centric.
                    Bass_Man86, this is how I see things.
                    The Phased Adaptive Approach (i.e. Euro Missile Shield) is to be implemented in phases:
                    PHASE 1 - Ship-based BMD via AEGIS/SM-3 by 2011
                    PHASE 2 - AEGIS Ashore in Romania by 2015
                    PHASE 3 - AEGIS Ashore in Poland by 2018
                    Succeeding phases will incorporate the more capable SM-3 blk II

                    So ship-based BMD is only the first step and was actually a nifty maneuver to sidestep Russian objections to what Pres.Bush originally wanted, the very expensive and long-range Ground Based Interceptor (GBI) built by Boeing. This is the missile that really upset the Russians who perceived it as a big threat as it could reach deep into Russian territory and, theoretically, could be armed with a nuke warhead converting it into a MRBM right in Russia's front yard.

                    By replacing GBI with a SM-3 Blk I with a 300 mile range perhaps 1/5th that of GBI), they placated the Russians. Of course, when SM-3 Blk II with it's enhanced range becomes available, expect the Russians to throw another tantrum.

                    Work on AEGIS Ashore is ongoing and once, deployed it is expected that the Navy will operate it. It remains to be seen if THAAD/SM-3 will develop into an actual operational capability though the successful test would seem to indicate it's potential. If it did materialize, it would be reasonable to expect the Army to operate it as THAAD is their baby.

                    http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums...as-Frontrunner

                    ....Raytheon officials are working on how to integrate a land-based SM-3 into the existing radar and fire-control architecture for the Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense (Thaad) units being purchased by the Army. Booen says the company has integrated SM-3 flyout tables into the Thaad fire-control software and demonstrated the ability for Thaad’s systems to generate an accurate firing solution and launch command.

                    Interaction with the Thaad’s AN/TPY-2 X-band radar would require a new data link for the SM-3, says Pete Franklin, Raytheon vice president of national and theater security programs; SM-3 now operates with the ship-based Aegis AN/SPY-1 S-band system. Booen says the next priority is to conduct pole tests of a data link for S- and X-band operations. MDA’s O’Reilly says he is considering land bases for the Aegis radar and fire-control architecture for the SM-3 option, though no decisions have yet been mad

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by kuma View Post
                      Bass_Man86, this is how I see things.
                      The Phased Adaptive Approach (i.e. Euro Missile Shield) is to be implemented in phases:
                      PHASE 1 - Ship-based BMD via AEGIS/SM-3 by 2011
                      PHASE 2 - AEGIS Ashore in Romania by 2015
                      PHASE 3 - AEGIS Ashore in Poland by 2018
                      Succeeding phases will incorporate the more capable SM-3 blk II

                      So ship-based BMD is only the first step and was actually a nifty maneuver to sidestep Russian objections to what Pres.Bush originally wanted, the very expensive and long-range Ground Based Interceptor (GBI) built by Boeing. This is the missile that really upset the Russians who perceived it as a big threat as it could reach deep into Russian territory and, theoretically, could be armed with a nuke warhead converting it into a MRBM right in Russia's front yard.

                      By replacing GBI with a SM-3 Blk I with a 300 mile range perhaps 1/5th that of GBI), they placated the Russians. Of course, when SM-3 Blk II with it's enhanced range becomes available, expect the Russians to throw another tantrum.

                      Work on AEGIS Ashore is ongoing and once, deployed it is expected that the Navy will operate it. It remains to be seen if THAAD/SM-3 will develop into an actual operational capability though the successful test would seem to indicate it's potential. If it did materialize, it would be reasonable to expect the Army to operate it as THAAD is their baby.

                      http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums...as-Frontrunner

                      ....Raytheon officials are working on how to integrate a land-based SM-3 into the existing radar and fire-control architecture for the Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense (Thaad) units being purchased by the Army. Booen says the company has integrated SM-3 flyout tables into the Thaad fire-control software and demonstrated the ability for Thaad’s systems to generate an accurate firing solution and launch command.

                      Interaction with the Thaad’s AN/TPY-2 X-band radar would require a new data link for the SM-3, says Pete Franklin, Raytheon vice president of national and theater security programs; SM-3 now operates with the ship-based Aegis AN/SPY-1 S-band system. Booen says the next priority is to conduct pole tests of a data link for S- and X-band operations. MDA’s O’Reilly says he is considering land bases for the Aegis radar and fire-control architecture for the SM-3 option, though no decisions have yet been mad
                      Please don't get me wrong as that is a great post, but from a purely political standpoint I really do not see this program transitioning ashore anytime soon; at least not outside of CONUS. Considering the current emphasis on Seabasing I am pretty certain that it will remain ship based and if it stays on a ship the Army will not get near it; those bubbas get seasick at the mere mention of the word wave. On a serious level the Army will not be funded nearly as well as the Navy in the future and the fact is that the Navy has a heck of a lot more experience with surface to air missiles anyway. Is there going to be some Army involvement? Quite possible, the question is how much. I for one am betting that this is going to be primarily a Navy baby.
                      Give me a fast ship and the wind at my back for I intend to sail in harms way! (John Paul Jones)

                      Initiated Chief Petty Officer
                      Hard core! Old School! Deal with it!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Bass_Man86 View Post
                        Please don't get me wrong as that is a great post, but from a purely political standpoint I really do not see this program transitioning ashore anytime soon; at least not outside of CONUS. Considering the current emphasis on Seabasing I am pretty certain that it will remain ship based and if it stays on a ship the Army will not get near it; those bubbas get seasick at the mere mention of the word wave. On a serious level the Army will not be funded nearly as well as the Navy in the future and the fact is that the Navy has a heck of a lot more experience with surface to air missiles anyway. Is there going to be some Army involvement? Quite possible, the question is how much. I for one am betting that this is going to be primarily a Navy baby.
                        Fair enough.. we shall see how things unfold specially with Sequestration hanging like
                        ,Damocles Sword over everyone's head.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Galland View Post

                          ....funny but the more i look at all that, the more i think that they really aren't that "mobile" a SAM system if you have to move all the above at once with you every time you "scoot and shoot"...!!!

                          http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-S-300PMU2-Favorit.html
                          Granted it's a lot of trucks; but otherwise they are configured for quick deployment and it dosen't take a lot of time to go from a SAM site to a truck column.
                          Radio Paris Ment...
                          Radio Paris Ment...
                          Radio Paris est Allemand...

                          - Radio London opening intro

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Mobile land based systems in Europe make more sense to me than the silo based GBI. The whole thing has a somewhat tenuous political underpinning and I'd rather deploy gear we can pack up and reuse elsewhere than an expensive permanent installation that becomes a camping ground for the Green Party if our political allies loose an election.

                            (Just sayin' )
                            Any metaphor will tear if stretched over too much reality.

                            Questions about our site? See the FAQ.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Here's a couple of interesting and informative videos highlighting the BMDS capabilities including implementation of the Euro Missile Shield. A really good introduction to the progress being made .. Good stuff.



                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              • Cheetah772
                                The Expanse
                                Cheetah772
                                Anyone following The Expanse series? I am an avid fan of the books upon which the show is based on. I am so thrilled that Amazon picked up the show from...
                                Yesterday, 22:34
                              • wolfhnd
                                Tommy Robinson Arrested
                                wolfhnd
                                Hate speech laws and arbitrary enforcement of laws seem to be the norm in Europe now. Are "socialist" countries unavoidably totalitarian?
                                Yesterday, 20:55
                              • Cosmos
                                How to post a video
                                Cosmos
                                I've worked out how to post a video . Click on A to toggle Advanced Editor . Then in the last box of four on the new top row click the last symbol (Insert...
                                Yesterday, 18:00
                              Working...
                              X