Announcement

Collapse

New Site - PLEASE READ

Hello All,
My name is Ashley and I am the one that moved the forum to its new hosting location. This was done for security reasons and try to keep the forum from going down every other day. I understand that the new forum looks very different from the old one but I promise almost everything you had before you still have it might just be in a different place.

Items that are gone due to a limitation of the new hosting/ forum update:
- Awards
- Flags

As I was going thought your posts I was able to fix a lot fo the issues you were listing. Below is kind of a running list of issues an what is fixed and what I am still working on.

Items that I have fixed from your comments:
- Smilie are now working.
- Color/Theme changes
- Signature are now showing up. (Here is how to edit them https://screencast.com/t/OJHzzhiV1)
- Ranking is now showing up.
- Private messaging is now working.

Some issues I am still working on are:
- Missing items from the Calendar
- Like button the posts is giving an error.

One other note I have seen a lot is theme/color related items. I know this is important to all of you but at the moment the most important thing was getting you back a functioning forum with as many features I can get you back from before.

Theme/color is something we can change but it the moment I do not have the time and resources to fix all of the issue and design the site. I did do some theme updates yesterday but it is very time consuming. Please just be patient with the forum as we get it back to as close as I can to what you had before.

If anyone has any issues that they are running in to please let me know in the post below. Please give me as much detail as possible .
https://forums.armchairgeneral.com/forum/world-history-group-welcomes-you/armchair-general-magazine/5034776-new-site-please-read
See more
See less

Interesting map depicting the various tribes of America

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Clueless, ...

    ... absolutely clueless.

    I dont know the words to write to you to convey a message to you that will in return prevent you from talking down to me or insulting Mr Carapella... Its clear you know far more of Indian history then many people but are you saying all the tribal elders that spoke with Carapella, all the research and all the work Carapella did was crap?
    You don't know alot of things, and your display of sanctimonious indignity is completely misplaced.

    Let me clarify. You posted a link to an article i.e. "The Map Of Native American Tribes You've Never Seen Before", written by Hansi Lo Wang, on NPR.org, provided a snippet that included comments under the name "Herman":


    He adds that some Native American groups got stuck with names chosen arbitrarily by European settlers. They were often derogatory names other tribes used to describe their rivals. For example, "Comanche" is derived from a word in Ute meaning "anyone who wants to fight me all the time," according to the Encyclopaedia Britannica.

    "It's like having a map of North America where the United States is labeled 'gringos' and Mexico is labeled 'wetbacks,' " Herman says. "Naming is an exercise in power. Whether you're naming places or naming peoples, you are therefore asserting a power of sort of establishing what is reality and what is not."

    and asked "Any feedback on the above folks". I read the whole article, after your response here I can only assume that you didn't bother. My response to this article was:

    "It's a whole lotta crap. If this Doug Herman really is the senior geographer at the Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian in Washington, D.C., they really need to get someone else because this is clueless. I'm hoping that Hansi Lo Wang either heard wrong, misquoted Herman or made this all up."


    Note, "Herman", and "Hansi Lo Wang" - where do you see "Carapella" anywhere in my response?

    Of Carapella's map itself I said four words, "This map is wrong.", and provided several SPECIFIC examples. That said, clearly this comment is inappropriate:


    Its clear you know far more of Indian history then many people but are you saying all the tribal elders that spoke with Carapella, all the research and all the work Carapella did was crap?
    See above re: "crap". Now who EXACTLY did Carapella speak to, what ACTUAL research did he conduct, and what SOURCES did he use? Whatever they are, they obviously proved themselves to be inadequate.

    One more thing, Carapella didn't bother to talk to ME, or US. You see, my mother's family is Algonquin, originally from the Outaouais region of Quebec. I have uncles, cousins etc. who have full federal Indian Status, I have my own personal reasons for not applying for same. So when I pointed out "and the tribe known as the "Algonquin" (Omamiwinini) that gave their name to a whole language group, and the last one is nowhere to be found on the map.", it was personal, Carapella obviously didn't talk to anyone in my family about it, we're not even on the map!

    My response to Herman's comments i.e.
    It's like having a map of North America where the United States is labeled 'gringos' and Mexico is labeled 'wetbacks,'
    was:

    FN people today are called what they want to be called, that's their reality. Some prefer names from languages that few of their members can speak or understand i.e. Innu, Lakota etc. others remain post-contact traditional i.e. Seminole, Windego etc.

    Why? My family are "Algonquin", that's the FN/tribal name they use, they don't use "Omamiwinini", does that really make them akin to "Wetbacks" and "Gringos" as Herman would have you believe? I will say it again, he's full of "crap"!!!

    As for the rest, Mr. Carapella is welcome to use the endorsements of "Mr. Jeffrey M. Williams" and "Yvonne M. Dennis" to shill his maps, but he's not going to get mine.


    I'll finish off with this. Many years ago I was sent to attend a week long "Aboriginal Awareness" course, designed for white collar, largely urban government employees, presented by FN's. Like me, there were several coppers in attendance with plenty of experience working Reserves; comparing notes we soon realised that we had become immersed in the homogenised, warm and fuzzy, kumbaya version of FN history, with FN's as victims; very little of what was was presented actually existed in the real world, none of us had seen it.

    At the end of it all, we were asked for feedback, one of our number, a Canine Handler from an elite unit, laid right into it, criticising the course top to bottom. The course managers were livid, went to the Bureau Commander, called the K9 handler racist, wanted him disciplined, etc. It was investigated, the official response was:

    "you asked for feedback, accept it with grace, and learn from it."

    And that's my gift to you ...
    "I am Groot"
    - Groot

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Marmat View Post
      ... absolutely clueless.



      You don't know alot of things, and your display of sanctimonious indignity is completely misplaced.

      Let me clarify. You posted a link to an article i.e. "The Map Of Native American Tribes You've Never Seen Before", written by Hansi Lo Wang, on NPR.org, provided a snippet that included comments under the name "Herman":





      and asked "Any feedback on the above folks". I read the whole article, after your response here I can only assume that you didn't bother. My response to this article was:

      "It's a whole lotta crap. If this Doug Herman really is the senior geographer at the Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian in Washington, D.C., they really need to get someone else because this is clueless. I'm hoping that Hansi Lo Wang either heard wrong, misquoted Herman or made this all up."


      Note, "Herman", and "Hansi Lo Wang" - where do you see "Carapella" anywhere in my response?

      Of Carapella's map itself I said four words, "This map is wrong.", and provided several SPECIFIC examples. That said, clearly this comment is inappropriate:




      See above re: "crap". Now who EXACTLY did Carapella speak to, what ACTUAL research did he conduct, and what SOURCES did he use? Whatever they are, they obviously proved themselves to be inadequate.

      One more thing, Carapella didn't bother to talk to ME, or US. You see, my mother's family is Algonquin, originally from the Outaouais region of Quebec. I have uncles, cousins etc. who have full federal Indian Status, I have my own personal reasons for not applying for same. So when I pointed out "and the tribe known as the "Algonquin" (Omamiwinini) that gave their name to a whole language group, and the last one is nowhere to be found on the map.", it was personal, Carapella obviously didn't talk to anyone in my family about it, we're not even on the map!

      My response to Herman's comments i.e. was:

      FN people today are called what they want to be called, that's their reality. Some prefer names from languages that few of their members can speak or understand i.e. Innu, Lakota etc. others remain post-contact traditional i.e. Seminole, Windego etc.

      Why? My family are "Algonquin", that's the FN/tribal name they use, they don't use "Omamiwinini", does that really make them akin to "Wetbacks" and "Gringos" as Herman would have you believe? I will say it again, he's full of "crap"!!!

      As for the rest, Mr. Carapella is welcome to use the endorsements of "Mr. Jeffrey M. Williams" and "Yvonne M. Dennis" to shill his maps, but he's not going to get mine.


      I'll finish off with this. Many years ago I was sent to attend a week long "Aboriginal Awareness" course, designed for white collar, largely urban government employees, presented by FN's. Like me, there were several coppers in attendance with plenty of experience working Reserves; comparing notes we soon realised that we had become immersed in the homogenised, warm and fuzzy, kumbaya version of FN history, with FN's as victims; very little of what was was presented actually existed in the real world, none of us had seen it.

      At the end of it all, we were asked for feedback, one of our number, a Canine Handler from an elite unit, laid right into it, criticising the course top to bottom. The course managers were livid, went to the Bureau Commander, called the K9 handler racist, wanted him disciplined, etc. It was investigated, the official response was:

      "you asked for feedback, accept it with grace, and learn from it."

      And that's my gift to you ...
      Oh my goodness gracious lol. I stopped reading after your intro...

      All I can say is contact Mr Carapella if you have a disagreement with the gentlemen.
      Long live the Lionheart! Please watch this video
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=jRDwlR4zbEM
      The philosophy of the gospel is the philosophy of equality, consequently the most favorable to republican government
      -Napoleon Bonaparte

      Comment


      • #18
        The Colorado presentation is wildly inaccurate.

        As for anyone "contacting Mr. Carapella", you presented his map here as fact; therefore, I'm letting you know that he's wrong.


        Native American Tribes of Colorado
        The original inhabitants of the area that is now Colorado included:
        The Apache nation
        The Arapaho nation
        The Cheyenne nation
        The Pueblo tribes
        The Shoshone tribe
        The Ute nation
        Other Indian tribes whose territory sometimes extended into Colorado
        included:
        The Comanche tribe
        The Kiowa tribe
        The Navajo tribe
        Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

        Comment


        • #19
          More to the point, irrelevant except to an anthropologist...

          Yvonne M. Dennis -author of Native American Almanac: More Than 50,000 Years of the Cultures and Histories of Indigenous Peoples
          And, they never got beyond the late stone age...

          That's hard, but fair.

          Comment

          Latest Topics

          Collapse

          Working...
          X