Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Question for editors.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Question for editors.

    Why have I been harassed for airing my views and chastised (which I deserved) for some rude comments I made and yet NOTHING has been said to DAN NEELY who made up a post that I did not post. You know HE LIED, he actually made stuff. Well has he been warned about his disgusting behaviour ?

  • #2
    Marko, the reason I haven't said anything is because I don't know what statements you are talking about. Please contact me in private so we can discuss any issues you have and I will look into them.

    This is for everyone; As I said before, all views are accepted here if put forth in a semi-constructive way and not meant as personal derogatory attacks. Please be considerate of each other.

    Our forefathers died to give us freedom, not free stuff.

    I write books about zombies as E.E. Isherwood. Check me out at ZombieBooks.net.

    Comment


    • #3
      Marko, you can not seriously expect that we can prove each single quote for truth. Believe it or not, we have real lifes. To control the board is not our profession, we don't get paid for this or anything else we do for the club.

      But if people start to insult other people, then be sure this will rise our attention. This breakes the rules on all public boards and we be handled in an appropriate way.

      BTW, I'm curious. Which of the games we support do you like most?
      Resistance is futile!
      My little company

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Question for editors.

        Originally posted by Marko
        Why have I been harassed for airing my views and chastised (which I deserved) for some rude comments I made and yet NOTHING has been said to DAN NEELY who made up a post that I did not post. You know HE LIED, he actually made stuff. Well has he been warned about his disgusting behaviour ?
        I think that what Marko is referring to is Dan's post in http://www.warfarehq.com/forums/show...&threadid=1405 where he attributes "alot of anitsemetic sewage removed to keep me from vomiting" to Marko.

        It did throw me for a second, until I realized that Dan had gone inside the quote tags, removed the rather lengthy body of Marko's unattributed quote, and then substituted what Dan thought it all boiled down to. I admit that to someone who is not thinking too clearly about the possibilities, it can be misunderstood. However, to someone who is taking the time to calmly analyze the comments of various posters, and to scan through the thread for verification, it is rather obvious that Dan simply did not want to repost all of that, when his own response was mostly just "Plonk".

        In that case it might best to avoid confusing those so easily misled, and simply have deleted the quote tags, and addressed the member by name, but as they say, that's all history now...
        I have no problem at all with being proved wrong. Especially when being proved wrong leaves the world a better place, than being proved right...

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Re: Question for editors.

          Originally posted by JAMiAM


          I think that what Marko is referring to is Dan's post in http://www.warfarehq.com/forums/show...&threadid=1405 where he attributes "alot of anitsemetic sewage removed to keep me from vomiting" to Marko.

          It did throw me for a second, until I realized that Dan had gone inside the quote tags, removed the rather lengthy body of Marko's unattributed quote, and then substituted what Dan thought it all boiled down to. I admit that to someone who is not thinking too clearly about the possibilities, it can be misunderstood. However, to someone who is taking the time to calmly analyze the comments of various posters, and to scan through the thread for verification, it is rather obvious that Dan simply did not want to repost all of that, when his own response was mostly just "Plonk".

          In that case it might best to avoid confusing those so easily misled, and simply have deleted the quote tags, and addressed the member by name, but as they say, that's all history now...
          In retrospect, you're probabally right that I should've phrased my post a little less ambigously. I attempted to clarify it, but because the thread was locked I wasn't permitted to edit it. Since I cannot, if one of the moderators would strip the quote tags for me, I'd be grateful.
          "Lord... forgive me my actions, speech and thoughts. Because, Lord, I am seriously going to kick some unrighteous ass in Your Name, Amen."
          Princess of Wands by John Ringo (Jan 2006)

          http://www.baen.com/chapters/W200601...9232.htm?blurb

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Re: Re: Question for editors.

            Originally posted by Dan Neely
            In retrospect, you're probabally right that I should've phrased my post a little less ambigously. I attempted to clarify it, but because the thread was locked I wasn't permitted to edit it. Since I cannot, if one of the moderators would strip the quote tags for me, I'd be grateful.
            Done
            Resistance is futile!
            My little company

            Comment


            • #7
              Scipio - I play ACOW, EF & WF.

              Everyone else - I am now satisfied that the 'Neelygate' scandal has been resolved.

              Comment


              • #8
                Glad to see that I get warned about my tone and others do not. Very good.

                Comment

                Latest Topics

                Collapse

                Working...
                X