Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Correct a typo, go to jail...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Correct a typo, go to jail...

    And people still try to persuade themselves that the Bush Regime isn't the biggest threat to American Freedom since the Nazis...

    I'm sure glad that I'm not doing any dangerous things like aiding and abetting the enemy by erasing unnesessary commas,, and also that of mistpelling words.
    Treasury Department Is Warning Publishers of the Perils of Criminal Editing of the Enemy

    By ADAM LIPTAK
    Published: February 28, 2004

    Writers often grumble about the criminal things editors do to their prose. The federal government has recently weighed in on the same issue literally.

    It has warned publishers they may face grave legal consequences for editing manuscripts from Iran and other disfavored nations, on the ground that such tinkering amounts to trading with the enemy.

    Anyone who publishes material from a country under a trade embargo is forbidden to reorder paragraphs or sentences, correct syntax or grammar, or replace "inappropriate words," according to several advisory letters from the Treasury Department in recent months.

    Adding illustrations is prohibited, too. To the baffled dismay of publishers, editors and translators who have been briefed about the policy, only publication of "camera-ready copies of manuscripts" is allowed.

    The Treasury letters concerned Iran. But the logic, experts said, would seem to extend to Cuba, Libya, North Korea and other nations with which most trade is banned without a government license.

    Laws and regulations prohibiting trade with various nations have been enforced for decades, generally applied to items like oil, wheat, nuclear reactors and, sometimes, tourism. Applying them to grammar, spelling and punctuation is an infuriating interpretation, several people in the publishing industry said.

    "It is against the principles of scholarship and freedom of expression, as well as the interests of science, to require publishers to get U.S. government permission to publish the works of scholars and researchers who happen to live in countries with oppressive regimes," said Eric A. Swanson, a senior vice president at John Wiley & Sons, which publishes scientific, technical and medical books and journals.

    Nahid Mozaffari, a scholar and editor specializing in literature from Iran, called the implications staggering. "A story, a poem, an article on history, archaeology, linguistics, engineering, physics, mathematics, or any other area of knowledge cannot be translated, and even if submitted in English, cannot be edited in the U.S.," she said.

    "This means that the publication of the PEN Anthology of Contemporary Persian Literature that I have been editing for the last three years," she said, "would constitute aiding and abetting the enemy."

    Allan Adler, a lawyer with the Association of American Publishers, said the trade group was unaware of any prosecutions for criminal editing. But he said the mere fact of the rules had scared some publishers into rejecting works from Iran.

    Lee Tien, a lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a civil liberties group, questioned the logic of making editors a target of broad regulations that require a government license.

    "There is no obvious reason why a license is required to edit where no license is required to publish," he said. "They can print anything as is. But they can't correct typos?"

    In theory almost certainly only in theory correcting typographical errors and performing other routine editing could subject publishers to fines of $500,000 and 10 years in jail.

    "Such activity," according to a September letter from the department's Office of Foreign Assets Control to the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, "would constitute the provision of prohibited services to Iran."

    Tara Bradshaw, a Treasury Department spokeswoman, confirmed the restrictions on manuscripts from Iran in a statement. Banned activities include, she wrote, "collaboration on and editing of the manuscripts, the selection of reviewers, and facilitation of a review resulting in substantive enhancements or alterations to the manuscripts."

    She did not respond to a request seeking an explanation of the department's reasoning.

    Congress has tried to exempt "information or informational materials" from the nation's trade embargoes. Since 1988, it has prohibited the executive branch from interfering "directly or indirectly" with such trade. That exception is known as the Berman Amendment, after its sponsor, Representative Howard L. Berman, a California Democrat.

    Critics said the Treasury Department had long interpreted the amendment narrowly and grudgingly. Even so, Mr. Berman said, the recent letters were "a very bizarre interpretation."

    "It is directly contrary to the amendment and to the intent of the amendment," he said. "I also don't understand why it's not in our interest to get information into Iran."

    Kenneth R. Foster, a professor of bioengineering at the University of Pennsylvania, said the government had grown insistent on the editing ban. "Since 9/11 and since the Bush administration took office," he said, "the Treasury Department has been ramping up enforcement."

    Publishers may still seek licenses from the government that would allow editing, but many First Amendment specialists said that was an unacceptable alternative.

    "That's censorship," said Leon Friedman, a Hofstra law professor who sometimes represents PEN. "That's a prior restraint."

    Esther Allen, chairwoman of the PEN American Center's translation committee, said the rules would also appear to ban translations. "During the cold war, the idea was to let voices from behind the Iron Curtain be heard," she said. "Now that's called trading with the enemy?"

    In an internal legal analysis last month, the publishers' association found that the regulations "constitute a serious threat to the U.S. publishing community in general and to scholarly and scientific publishers in particular." Mr. Adler, the association's lawyer, said it was trying to persuade officials to alter the regulations and might file a legal challenge.

    These days, journals published by the engineering institute reject manuscripts from Iran that need extensive editing and run a disclaimer with those they accept, said Michael R. Lightner, the institute vice president responsible for publications. "It tells readers," he said, "that the article did not get the final polish we would like."

    After all...we all know the dangers of proper punctuation...
    I have no problem at all with being proved wrong. Especially when being proved wrong leaves the world a better place, than being proved right...

  • #2
    Hmmm...as both a Bush supporter and a federal employee, I find this a little odd. I'd be interested to hear what's really going on with the law and its enforcement. The other thing I've found is how often the media misrepresents programs, laws, etc. Not necessarily on purpose, but because they don't fully understand what they're writing about.

    On its face, I'd have to agree with you on this one. Strange, but I'm sure we'll never hear the full story.

    Take care,
    Brian

    Comment


    • #3
      If anyone needs anymore proof the current powers that be could care less about the consitution....
      "Have you forgotten the face of your father?"

      Comment


      • #4
        Hello,

        Both Jamiam and media are overreacting and blowing this out of porportion, but then I wouldn't expect anything less from an anti-American liberal and leftist media.

        Dan
        Major James Holden, Georgia Badgers Militia of Rainbow Regiment, American Civil War

        "Aim small, miss small."

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Cheetah772
          Hello,

          Both Jamiam and media are overreacting and blowing this out of porportion, but then I wouldn't expect anything less from an anti-American liberal and leftist media.

          Dan
          Blowing what out of proportion? Where is the inflation of importance, O' Master of Trite Conservatism?

          Like I said in another thread....

          Discussssssss...
          Even Jesus will never forgive what you do - Bob Dylan

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Cheetah772
            Hello,

            Both Jamiam and media are overreacting and blowing this out of porportion, but then I wouldn't expect anything less from an anti-American liberal and leftist media.

            Dan

            How is it over-reacting? Telling someone they cannot edit a document and then print it is blantant and disgusting. But then again I wouldn't expect anything less from an anti-freedom Neo-Conservative.
            "Have you forgotten the face of your father?"

            Comment


            • #7
              US oil companies are doing business with Iran (evil doers) today through dummy offshore subsidiaries. They don't apologize for this because it is 'legal'. Perhaps if the publishers were part of the Texas Oil/White House connection they would be able to move some punctuation marks around without fear of Federal Agents coming to take them away.
              And we are here as on a darkling plain
              Swept with confused alarms of struggle and flight,
              Where ignorant armies clash by night.


              Matthew Arnold

              Comment


              • #8
                I can hear the tromping sound of goose-stepping jackboots already....

                Comment

                Latest Topics

                Collapse

                • casanova
                  Berlin.1945
                  by casanova
                  The Sowjet T-34 tank against a German Tiger tank in Berlin in the II World War in 1945. ...
                  Yesterday, 23:41
                • casanova
                  AW 169M
                  by casanova
                  The Austrian minister of defence Klaudia Tanner declared the buy of 18 Italian military helicopters of the type AW 169M for the Austrian army, the Bundesheer....
                  Yesterday, 23:26
                • JBark
                  What changed?
                  by JBark
                  There was a time not too long ago when this forum was full of discussion, multiple posts, votes and involved discussions on the best of the war, etc.,...
                  Yesterday, 18:54
                Working...
                X