Announcement

Collapse

New Site - PLEASE READ

Hello All,
My name is Ashley and I am the one that moved the forum to its new hosting location. This was done for security reasons and try to keep the forum from going down every other day. I understand that the new forum looks very different from the old one but I promise almost everything you had before you still have it might just be in a different place.

Items that are gone due to a limitation of the new hosting/ forum update:
- Awards
- Flags

As I was going thought your posts I was able to fix a lot fo the issues you were listing. Below is kind of a running list of issues an what is fixed and what I am still working on.

Items that I have fixed from your comments:
- Smilie are now working.
- Color/Theme changes
- Signature are now showing up. (Here is how to edit them https://screencast.com/t/OJHzzhiV1)
- Ranking is now showing up.
- Private messaging is now working.

Some issues I am still working on are:
- Missing items from the Calendar
- Like button the posts is giving an error.

One other note I have seen a lot is theme/color related items. I know this is important to all of you but at the moment the most important thing was getting you back a functioning forum with as many features I can get you back from before.

Theme/color is something we can change but it the moment I do not have the time and resources to fix all of the issue and design the site. I did do some theme updates yesterday but it is very time consuming. Please just be patient with the forum as we get it back to as close as I can to what you had before.

If anyone has any issues that they are running in to please let me know in the post below. Please give me as much detail as possible .
https://forums.armchairgeneral.com/forum/world-history-group-welcomes-you/armchair-general-magazine/5034776-new-site-please-read
See more
See less

Thoughts on over-all Russian Performance

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Erkki View Post



    I have contacts in the RF army, they was to some degree taken by surprise, they knew that Georgians would make provocations, but they was not ready for a full scale invasion.

    Yes Russia has problems admitting loosing old tanks like T-64 and T-72
    It still remains to be seen if the Georgians were "making provocations" or were "responding" to provocations -- jury is still out on that.
    I like Dogs far better than most People

    As our Supply Sargent once said "If'n you only got one - order one - If'n you got Two - turn one in !! (???)

    BoRG

    Comment


    • #62
      The EU said that the Georgian "aggression" was a misstake... So at least they have made up their mind.
      “For there is nothing more serious than a lunatic when he comes to the central point of his lunacy.”

      Max Sterner

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Erkki View Post
        The EU said that the Georgian "aggression" was a misstake... So at least they have made up their mind.
        But - the question remains -- was it Provoked our Unprovoked ?
        I like Dogs far better than most People

        As our Supply Sargent once said "If'n you only got one - order one - If'n you got Two - turn one in !! (???)

        BoRG

        Comment


        • #64
          Considering that they were outnumbered, and the 58th Army isn't exactly an exemplary Russian unit in terms of equipment, I think Russia did pretty well. They showed they still have muscle, and they realized they have units other than Spetnaz, VDV, etc. They also didn't go ahead and bomb the place ahead of time-more out of the fact they wanted to keep the people in SO alive, but still didn't help their ground forces much.
          http://chickencrap.com/images/1472.jpg

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Rynnäkkökivääri View Post
            Considering that they were outnumbered, and the 58th Army isn't exactly an exemplary Russian unit in terms of equipment, I think Russia did pretty well. They showed they still have muscle, and they realized they have units other than Spetnaz, VDV, etc. They also didn't go ahead and bomb the place ahead of time-more out of the fact they wanted to keep the people in SO alive, but still didn't help their ground forces much.
            You don't want to give the Russians too much credit here -- there will be no Andrey or Emil_G to argue with if you do that
            I like Dogs far better than most People

            As our Supply Sargent once said "If'n you only got one - order one - If'n you got Two - turn one in !! (???)

            BoRG

            Comment


            • #66
              Please try to stay focused people.

              Originally posted by Kaiser Franz View Post
              But - the question remains -- was it Provoked our Unprovoked ?
              A question still being beaten to death in other threads.



              Originally posted by Erkki
              Once again I need to repeat myself about that it wasn´t the entire 54th army that moved in but a small force of troops with perhaps 10 BMP, 1-2 Tanks propably T-72.
              It was even critisised to some degree since the commander was with that group.
              I think this is important as this was not the sort of deployment that the US would be faced with. Grabbing a reinforced motorized rifle company, jumping on the highway, and driving to a battle less than a day away is a rather less impressive feat then getting even a few brigades moving in the same time.

              In 1982 my tank battalion in West Germany could get the first company out the gate with a partial ammo load in two hours starting from a 3 AM alert. Some of us junior officers lived 20 minutes away so that included the recall time to get us all in to the barracks.

              The difficulty in the Georgian operation is to try to piece together just how well each unit did/did not perform from such limited information.
              Attached Files
              Any metaphor will tear if stretched over too much reality.

              Questions about our site? See the FAQ.

              Comment


              • #67
                It didn't really say anything about Russia, the war was against a little guy so it was pretty clear who would win.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Erkki View Post
                  The EU said that the Georgian "aggression" was a misstake... So at least they have made up their mind.
                  ..certainly this had a bearing on the origins of the conflict, no doubt, so lets forhet about it, whats done is done, isnt it..!

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Erkki View Post



                    I have contacts in the RF army, they was to some degree taken by surprise, they knew that Georgians would make provocations, but they was not ready for a full scale invasion.

                    Yes Russia has problems admitting loosing old tanks like T-64 and T-72
                    ..although not knowing all the facts, but knowing that the basic grunt on the ground has absolutely no idea what is going on above his platoon, ill say that certain Russian units were on a higher alert than usual, just in case, not all of them, but some, it makes sense to me to do this, i think any army would try to prepare in such a manner..

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      I don't know much about the start either -- other than certain elements of the 58th Army were deployed very quickly - cell phone conversations recorded seemed to indicate a high state of readiness on the part of the Russians -- that's why I'm curious if the Georgians were "baited" -- Even though that notion may be being "beaten to death in other threads - it's still an open question for me.
                      I like Dogs far better than most People

                      As our Supply Sargent once said "If'n you only got one - order one - If'n you got Two - turn one in !! (???)

                      BoRG

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        certainly, i agree, but still feel that some elements of the Russian army were given prior notice of what was going to happen, but, for my feelings, see post 69.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by galland View Post
                          certainly, i agree, but still feel that some elements of the Russian army were given prior notice of what was going to happen, but, for my feelings, see post 69.
                          I agree - some elements must have been given "prior notice" -- the question is -- based on what intelligence ? My understanding is that, just earlier in the evening Saakashvili had flat stated that diplomacy was his goal -- something changed that and an attack was ordered -- why? -- that's the question .

                          Who did what to cause him to alter his goal ? Was it a preplanned intentional provocation - and were the Russians behind it -- and is that why they were "ready" ?
                          I like Dogs far better than most People

                          As our Supply Sargent once said "If'n you only got one - order one - If'n you got Two - turn one in !! (???)

                          BoRG

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by Kaiser Franz View Post
                            I agree - some elements must have been given "prior notice" -- the question is -- based on what intelligence ? My understanding is that, just earlier in the evening Saakashvili had flat stated that diplomacy was his goal -- something changed that and an attack was ordered -- why? -- that's the question .
                            Who did what to cause him to alter his goal ? Was it a preplanned intentional provocation - and were the Russians behind it -- and is that why they were "ready" ?
                            I can state that I agree with you and it would be the same, a lie.

                            There was signs the entire time.
                            Look a the dates
                            http://www.russiatoday.com/search?se...earch_pager=48
                            “For there is nothing more serious than a lunatic when he comes to the central point of his lunacy.”

                            Max Sterner

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by galland View Post
                              ..although not knowing all the facts, but knowing that the basic grunt on the ground has absolutely no idea what is going on above his platoon, ill say that certain Russian units were on a higher alert than usual, just in case, not all of them, but some, it makes sense to me to do this, i think any army would try to prepare in such a manner..
                              Grunts? What are you taking me for? I know officers that knows higher officers and journalists that was in S Ossetia, I know people with relatives in Georgia. Well I know grunts to of course.
                              “For there is nothing more serious than a lunatic when he comes to the central point of his lunacy.”

                              Max Sterner

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Some other info:
                                http://forum.warfare.ru/special/page/4/
                                “For there is nothing more serious than a lunatic when he comes to the central point of his lunacy.”

                                Max Sterner

                                Comment

                                Latest Topics

                                Collapse

                                Working...
                                X