Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2nd Circuit Court Obama apointees lose another case

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2nd Circuit Court Obama apointees lose another case

    The Supreme Court just reversed a nation-wide injunction issued / upheld by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals on a Trump policy that green cards could be denied to immigrants who used public welfare and other such benefits.

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wire...-rule-68566375

    While the three Leftist justices, and one Progressive-Liberal justice voted to allow this, they were out voted by the rest of the court.

    Yea!

  • #2
    Good!

    Green card holders should not be getting public welfare and other such benefits.
    "I don't discuss sitting presidents," Mattis tells NPR in an interview. "I believe that you owe a period of quiet."

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
      The Supreme Court just reversed a nation-wide injunction issued / upheld by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals on a Trump policy that green cards could be denied to immigrants who used public welfare and other such benefits.

      https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wire...-rule-68566375

      While the three Leftist justices, and one Progressive-Liberal justice voted to allow this, they were out voted by the rest of the court.

      Yea!
      So is this another trump victory in court?

      Curiously the ABC report tried to minimize Gorsuch’s opinion attacking the practice of nationwide injunctions.
      Avatar is General Gerard, courtesy of Zouave.

      Churchill to Chamberlain: you had a choice between war and dishonor. You chose dishonor, and you will have war.

      Comment


      • #4
        It's a victory for the taxpayers. How many people are we expected to support, and why?
        Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
          It's a victory for the taxpayers. How many people are we expected to support, and why?
          Partial victory.....

          We shouldn't be support green card holders, legal immigrants and illegal immigrants.
          "I don't discuss sitting presidents," Mattis tells NPR in an interview. "I believe that you owe a period of quiet."

          Comment


          • #6
            Next thing should be to stop food stamps to those who are able to work but won't because "Uncle Sugar" gives them the public tit.
            I've seen these people in the checkout line at the supermarket buying $12/lb. meats, lobster tails, gourmet items, etc. and then pulling out 2 or even 3 EBT cards to pay for it all. The cashiers roll their eyes but what can THEY do? Perhaps there should be fraud checkers at random supermarkets.
            ARRRR! International Talk Like A Pirate Day - September 19th
            IN MARE IN COELO

            Comment


            • #7
              If you look at people like Ocasio Cortez or Bernie Sanders what you see are people that hate liberal democracy. When they say they love America what they really mean is they love their vision of America. It should come as no surprise that people in the Sanders campaign would put Trump supporters in "reeducation" camps. In their minds America is a geographical location where Americans live not a set of customs and ideas.

              How the neo liberals came to embrace socialism is hard to explain. It's equally hard to explain why the resistance from the neo cons has been so half hearted. Perhaps the words of John Rockefeller illuminates the process "competition is a sin".

              Both Bernie Sanders and Ocasio Cortez came to power without any serious competition. In fact neither have engaged in any serious competition in their lives. Everything they have was more or less handed to them without any serious effort on their part. Like Hunter Biden they are the beneficiaries of a lucrative political process devoid of meritocracy. The same is true of the Clinton's, Obama, most of the media, Hollywood, the financial sector and neo cons like the Bushs and John Bolton.

              How many of our Judges got their positions not through a meritocratic system but by being political hacks? Why would we expect that they would embrace liberal democracy when it is alien to their experience? Why would they embrace limited, meritocratic, and judicious immigration? How could their egos even sustain such concepts?

              Part of the problem with Luxus is it give you the luxury to not only be incompetent but to not suffer the consequences of your incompetence. Worse still it gives you the luxury to not expect competency in others. Why make the test for immigration competency when competency is not part of your experience. When success in life has as much to do with branding by a university, your appearance, who you know instead of what you know, celebrity, and verbal intelligence not general intelligence meritocracy is an alien idea.

              Ask yourself why did the Russian revolution come at exactly the time that Russia was finally pulling itself out of medieval serfdom. It didn't come from the serfs themselves but from the ranks of a new non meritocratic middle class "intelligencia" . People who obviously didn't love the serfs or the lower class but very much were in love with themselves. A love not born out of accomplishment but entitlement. An entitlement they were more than willing to transfer to the lower class as long as they held on to power.



              We hunt the hunters

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Jose50 View Post
                Next thing should be to stop food stamps to those who are able to work but won't because "Uncle Sugar" gives them the public tit.
                I've seen these people in the checkout line at the supermarket buying $12/lb. meats, lobster tails, gourmet items, etc. and then pulling out 2 or even 3 EBT cards to pay for it all. The cashiers roll their eyes but what can THEY do? Perhaps there should be fraud checkers at random supermarkets.
                Perhaps the government should offer a reward to people for turning in such fraud. Given the incredible increases in surveillance cameras and personal cameras-- every smart phone has one-- it would be easy to video document such abuse and turn it in.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Nichols View Post

                  Partial victory.....

                  We shouldn't be support green card holders, legal immigrants and illegal immigrants.
                  Agreed.
                  Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

                  Comment

                  Latest Topics

                  Collapse

                  Working...
                  X