Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Biden syndicate

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Biden syndicate

    He studied under the Clintons, figures
    Kinship-as-currency is hardly a new phenomenon in Washington. But as Joe Biden makes his third run at the nation's highest office, he has already confronted a sustained political attack on the decision by his son, Hunter, to accept a position on the board of directors for a Ukrainian energy firm - a decision that has figured prominently into the debate over President Trump's impeachment. The president has repeatedly called the Bidens "crooked," particularly with regard to Hunter Biden's business activities.
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ho...ain/ar-BBZ3ioX
    Dispite our best intentions, the system is dysfunctional that intelligence failure is guaranteed.
    Russ Travers, CIA analyst, 2001

  • #2
    And old man Biden is the top candidate?
    Crazy Bernie is still 2nd., even with that madman in Iowa working for him.

    May as well get used to the idea of another 4 years.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Phaing View Post
      And old man Biden is the top candidate?
      Crazy Bernie is still 2nd., even with that madman in Iowa working for him.

      May as well get used to the idea of another 4 years.
      What choice do we have?
      Dispite our best intentions, the system is dysfunctional that intelligence failure is guaranteed.
      Russ Travers, CIA analyst, 2001

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Phaing View Post
        And old man Biden is the top candidate?
        Crazy Bernie is still 2nd., even with that madman in Iowa working for him.

        May as well get used to the idea of another 4 years.
        The Democrats ran Hillary after all the criminal $h!+ she's done. It's pretty clear the Democrats don't pay much, if any, attention to the crimes and other wrongdoing those in their party commit.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post

          The Democrats ran Hillary after all the criminal $h!+ she's done. It's pretty clear the Democrats don't pay much, if any, attention to the crimes and other wrongdoing those in their party commit.
          Excellent point, democrats are very good at feeding at the t1t of the public .
          For an example, Tutor Perini is one of the largest construction companies in the US, it received government contracts with billions of dollars to build military installations in Iraq and Afghanistan during the ongoing war, who owns 75% of that company?
          Richard Blum, who is Sen. Feinstein's husband. Who was sitting on the committee over seeing military contracts? Need I say?
          Tutor Perini also got the contract to expand San Francisco International airport, and wentv760 million over budget. The same company received contracts to expand rail systems in California and was sued because it used steel tracks inferior to specs.
          But it gets better, in 2009 Feinstein introduced legislation authorizing 25 billion dollars to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a government agency which had just granted her husband's other company CB Richard Ellis, a contract to foreclose on real estate properties , at compensation rates higher than industry norms.
          Shortly afterwards CB John Ellis was awarded the exclusive right to sell 80 UU Postal properties sitting on prime real estate.
          Dispite our best intentions, the system is dysfunctional that intelligence failure is guaranteed.
          Russ Travers, CIA analyst, 2001

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post

            The Democrats ran Hillary after all the criminal $h!+ she's done. It's pretty clear the Democrats don't pay much, if any, attention to the crimes and other wrongdoing those in their party commit.
            The democrats ran Clinton because they were broke. She offered pay to play cash....the dems followed the money and now we have President Trump.

            Now the dems are stuck. Back a socialist or back a dem.....the socialist have the pay to play cash..
            "I don't discuss sitting presidents," Mattis tells NPR in an interview. "I believe that you owe a period of quiet."

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Nichols View Post

              The democrats ran Clinton because they were broke. She offered pay to play cash....the dems followed the money and now we have President Trump.

              Now the dems are stuck. Back a socialist or back a dem.....the socialist have the pay to play cash..
              What does that mean?
              She didn't pay for her own campaign, did she? What about all those Donations that all the candidates are always bragging about.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Phaing View Post

                What does that mean?
                She didn't pay for her own campaign, did she? What about all those Donations that all the candidates are always bragging about.
                Pretty simple.....its math

                https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...ks-2016-215774
                "I don't discuss sitting presidents," Mattis tells NPR in an interview. "I believe that you owe a period of quiet."

                Comment


                • #9
                  Well, I suppose the president has a history of some crooked business here and there as well.
                  I'd say, nothing new, what happened a century ago is still going on today and will remain so as long as the system is the way it is.
                  But the system won't be changed, and all that happens is people will take things little steps further to stretch what's acceptable.
                  "For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return"

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Rutger View Post
                    Well, I suppose the president has a history of some crooked business here and there as well.
                    I'd say, nothing new, what happened a century ago is still going on today and will remain so as long as the system is the way it is.
                    But the system won't be changed, and all that happens is people will take things little steps further to stretch what's acceptable.
                    Ya figger?>

                    The trout who swims against the current gets the most oxygen..

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      At least two: Trump University and the Trump Foundation, both examples of fraud.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post

                        The Democrats ran Hillary after all the criminal $h!+ she's done. It's pretty clear the Democrats don't pay much, if any, attention to the crimes and other wrongdoing those in their party commit.
                        Neither do Americans - Clinton's popularity actually went up after the Lewinsky scandal.
                        Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by marktwain View Post

                          Ya figger?>

                          OOO-GAH!! OOO-GAH!! TDS ALERT!! WOMEN AND CHILDREN TO THE SHELTERS!!

                          Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Massena View Post
                            At least two: Trump University and the Trump Foundation, both examples of fraud.
                            The OP is clearly not about Trump. Stay on track
                            Dispite our best intentions, the system is dysfunctional that intelligence failure is guaranteed.
                            Russ Travers, CIA analyst, 2001

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Urban hermit View Post

                              The OP is clearly not about Trump.
                              The cartoon most certainly is.

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              Working...
                              X