Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More Climate Change Denial stupidity......

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • More Climate Change Denial stupidity......

    Tee hee, pretty much a point by point rebuttal of 'Weedkiller' Patrick Moore
    Last edited by Jutland; 12 Oct 19, 05:14.

  • #2
     

    Comment


    • #3
      If you believe that the country that you live in is solely responsible for the climate changing, then do your part. Get rid of your car, house, savings, lifestyle, become a vegan, live in a sustainable commune, and submit to becoming a slave of Soro's Agenda 21 society where your worth is what you can contribute to the collective.

      Perhaps, you can explain why those countries that have gone a long way in cleaning up pollution and reducing CO2 emissions, a gas vital for photosynthesis and plant growth, should be punished while China, India, and Russia continue to pollute at will.
      “Breaking News,”

      “Something irrelevant in your life just happened and now we are going to blow it all out of proportion for days to keep you distracted from what's really going on.”

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by SRV Ron View Post
        If you believe that the country that you live in is solely responsible for the climate changing, then do your part. Get rid of your car, house, savings, lifestyle, become a vegan, live in a sustainable commune, and submit to becoming a slave of Soro's Agenda 21 society where your worth is what you can contribute to the collective.

        Perhaps, you can explain why those countries that have gone a long way in cleaning up pollution and reducing CO2 emissions, a gas vital for photosynthesis and plant growth, should be punished while China, India, and Russia continue to pollute at will.
        So I post a 17 minute long video and 16 minutes later you post a (quick count), 88 word diatribe that doesn't have a single bit of scientific content......

        Funny that.....

        Comment


        • #5
          The question was, do you believe that the people in your country are responsible for Climate Change? And, if so, what should be done to stop it.
          “Breaking News,”

          “Something irrelevant in your life just happened and now we are going to blow it all out of proportion for days to keep you distracted from what's really going on.”

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by SRV Ron View Post
            If you believe that the country that you live in is solely responsible for the climate changing, then do your part. Get rid of your car, house, savings, lifestyle, become a vegan, live in a sustainable commune, and submit to becoming a slave of Soro's Agenda 21 society where your worth is what you can contribute to the collective.
            Why should people have to get rid of their cars instead of holding fossil fuel corporations responsible? Why don't those crooked corporations have to do anything in your opinion?

            Perhaps, you can explain why those countries that have gone a long way in cleaning up pollution and reducing CO2 emissions, a gas vital for photosynthesis and plant growth, should be punished while China, India, and Russia continue to pollute at will.
            What does photosynthesis and plant growth have to do with anything? I smell a denier argument coming next.
            Large countries with massive CO2 emissions are already cleaning up their act. They recognize the problem. Why do you think Big Oil corporations should get a pass on the topic? Sounds like you'd prefer the American people to make sacrifices instead of the culprits.

            Comment


            • #7
              http://worldpopulationreview.com/cou...on-by-country/

              CO2 the US remains in second place behind China
              "Ask not what your country can do for you"

              Left wing, Right Wing same bird that they are killing.

              you’re entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Jutland View Post

                So I post a 17 minute long video and 16 minutes later you post a (quick count), 88 word diatribe that doesn't have a single bit of scientific content......

                Funny that.....
                But contains a serious question that you are avoiding answering. The polluting by those nations is not open to question; it's a matter of record. And by avoiding a cogent reply, you have destroyed the credibility of your own position.
                Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Half Pint John View Post
                  http://worldpopulationreview.com/cou...on-by-country/

                  CO2 the US remains in second place behind China
                  Highly doubtful given the appalling track record of Russia and India, not to mention any African nation and South America's slash and burn, or the incredibly polluting slums of Mexico.
                  Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by SRV Ron View Post
                    The question was, do you believe that the people in your country are responsible for Climate Change? And, if so, what should be done to stop it.
                    No. It is a cyclic natural phenomenon, and what should be done is to start adapting to what is coming instead of arrogantly believing that we can, or even should, control the world climate.
                    Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post

                      But contains a serious question that you are avoiding answering. The polluting by those nations is not open to question; it's a matter of record. And by avoiding a cogent reply, you have destroyed the credibility of your own position.
                      Nah, the issue of this this thread was the science, not policy.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by SRV Ron View Post
                        If you believe that the country that you live in is solely responsible for the climate changing, then do your part. Get rid of your car, house, savings, lifestyle, become a vegan, live in a sustainable commune, and submit to becoming a slave of Soro's Agenda 21 society where your worth is what you can contribute to the collective.

                        Perhaps, you can explain why those countries that have gone a long way in cleaning up pollution and reducing CO2 emissions, a gas vital for photosynthesis and plant growth, should be punished while China, India, and Russia continue to pollute at will.
                        Us libertarian's WONDER why you are becoming aurtoritarian...
                        The trout who swims against the current gets the most oxygen..

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post

                          No. It is a cyclic natural phenomenon, and what should be done is to start adapting to what is coming instead of arrogantly believing that we can, or even should, control the world climate.
                          You think the temperature and sea level rise is moving at a normal pace historically?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Why do the exaggerations go unchallenged by the media and the authoritarian left?

                            Global Warming is more about politics than science.

                            Environmentalism has become a cult.

                            We hunt the hunters

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by wolfhnd View Post
                              Environmentalism has become a cult.
                              Now, that is definitely true. Environmentalists wreak havoc on the environment when they can by unwittingly wanting it left entirely alone in a world with human inhabitants who do "stuff" to change the environment.

                              Here's how ridiculous environmentalists are:
                              A tree to be displayed outside the U.S. Capitol building over the holidays is supposed to come from a northern New Mexico forest.

                              That’s if the U.S. Forest Service can get an exception from a tree-cutting ban across all New Mexico national forests and one in Arizona.

                              A federal judge says people can cut firewood for personal use, but sidelined all other timber management activities.

                              The ban came in a 2013 lawsuit that environmentalists filed against the Forest Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, accusing them of failing to track the threatened Mexican spotted owl for more than 20 years.
                              https://www.azcentral.com/story/news...ee/3864712002/

                              The Mexican spotted owl thing is one of those clubs environmental groups use to keep people from doing anything to land. They essentially use proving a negative against land holders. That is, they make a claim there might be spotted owls on some chunk of land citing vague studies about the bird's range of habitat. They then say the land owner hasn't determined if the bird exists on that land at any time during the year and therefore shouldn't be able to do anything with the land until they know for absolutely sure there aren't any spotted owls on it.

                              Doing the necessary work to the standard demanded by environmentalists would be prohibitively expensive in many cases so it doesn't get done. Environmentalists then claim what studies exist are too poor to meet their standard and therefore the courts should ban activity. Of course, they can't prove there are even any birds on that land, but that doesn't matter.



                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              Working...
                              X