Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trump is Getting Desperate...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • T. A. Gardner
    replied
    Originally posted by Massena View Post

    If you conduct it honestly and within the accepted rules for eminent domain, then it's fine. If not, then it's a crime-it's called 'stealing.'

    And the impeachable offense is telling those who work for him that if they break the law he'll pardon them. He is calling for them to get the 'job' done no matter how they do it. That's the impeachable offense-he's telling his minions that it's OK to break the law.
    Trump wouldn't be doing it at all. Variously, the Departments of Homeland Security or Justice would be, and then through subordinate agencies like ICE and CBP. So, unless you can somehow prove Trump ordered, most likely in writing, these agencies break the law, you got nothin' as usual.

    Leave a comment:


  • Massena
    replied
    Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post

    Eminent Domain anyone? So, no, it's not an "impeachable offense."
    If you conduct it honestly and within the accepted rules for eminent domain, then it's fine. If not, then it's a crime-it's called 'stealing.'

    And the impeachable offense is telling those who work for him that if they break the law he'll pardon them. He is calling for them to get the 'job' done no matter how they do it. That's the impeachable offense-he's telling his minions that it's OK to break the law.

    Leave a comment:


  • Massena
    replied
    Originally posted by Nichols View Post

    What does the color of the wall have anything to do with the lie being presented by the MSM?

    Why did they bring it up?
    If I recall correctly, Trump is the one who wanted it painted black...

    Leave a comment:


  • T. A. Gardner
    replied
    Originally posted by Massena View Post

    The point being that Trump is advocating breaking the law, including taking people's private property, so that he can have his 'wall' built before the 2020 election. That is an impeachable offense...and it looks like it is right out of a dictator's 'playbook.'
    Eminent Domain anyone? So, no, it's not an "impeachable offense."

    Leave a comment:


  • Mountain Man
    replied
    Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
    Seizing private land is very concerning.
    Done all of the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nichols
    replied
    Originally posted by Massena View Post

    How is that idea making the proposed action 'racial'? That is a load of horse manure.
    What does the color of the wall have anything to do with the lie being presented by the MSM?

    Why did they bring it up?

    Leave a comment:


  • Nichols
    replied
    Originally posted by Massena View Post

    If you don't agree, then try and find something that proves the article wrong instead of insisting on something that is disingenuous.
    How do you go about proving that unnamed sources are wrong regarding an event that hasn't happened?

    It is disingenuous to claim that an unnamed source claiming that something will happen in the future......is correct.

    Leave a comment:


  • Massena
    replied
    Originally posted by Nichols View Post

    "He wants it Black" note how the color of the wall means nothing yet they are trying to make this racial.
    How is that idea making the proposed action 'racial'? That is a load of horse manure.

    And so is your continual support of a degenerate president.

    By the way, why did you capitalize 'black' when it isn't that way in the article? That is disingenuous at best and is definitely misrepresentation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Massena
    replied
    Originally posted by Nichols View Post

    Says who? More unnamed sources?
    If you don't agree, then try and find something that proves the article wrong instead of insisting on something that is disingenuous.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nichols
    replied
    Originally posted by Massena View Post

    Trump told is 'aides' that if they broke the law he would pardon them. At the very least, that can be called conspiracy to break the law. And the comment to go ahead and seize private land is not only offensive, it is illegal.
    Says who? More unnamed sources?

    Leave a comment:


  • Nichols
    replied
    Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
    Seizing private land is very concerning.
    You have to consider the source: WaPo and unnamed sources claiming that this will happen in the future.

    Think about the title of the piece:
    ‘Take the land’: President Trump wants a border wall. He wants it black. And he wants it by Election Day.


    More twisted MSM misdirection designed to strike fear in the hearts of people.

    "He wants it Black" note how the color of the wall means nothing yet they are trying to make this racial.

    Leave a comment:


  • Massena
    replied
    Originally posted by Nichols View Post

    What law is he advocating breaking? The secure fence act of 2006?
    Trump told is 'aides' that if they broke the law he would pardon them. At the very least, that can be called conspiracy to break the law. And the comment to go ahead and seize private land is not only offensive, it is illegal.

    Would you like Trump to have your property seized on a whim?

    From the subject article in the OP:

    'President Trump is so eager to complete hundreds of miles of border fence ahead of the 2020 presidential election that he has directed aides to fast-track billions of dollars’ worth of construction contracts, aggressively seize private land and disregard environmental rules, according to current and former officials involved with the project.'

    'He also has told worried subordinates that he will pardon them of any potential wrongdoing should they have to break laws to get the barriers built quickly, those officials said.'

    Leave a comment:


  • TactiKill J.
    replied
    Seizing private land is very concerning.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nichols
    replied
    Originally posted by Massena View Post

    The point being that Trump is advocating breaking the law,
    What law is he advocating breaking? The secure fence act of 2006?

    Leave a comment:


  • Massena
    replied
    Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    https://www.foxnews.com/media/mark-m...system-arizona

    Seems the WaPo isn't looking too hard... But, then again the WaPo's reporters are in Dirty City a gazillion miles from Arizona. I figure many of their reporters couldn't find Arizona on a map.
    The point being that Trump is advocating breaking the law, including taking people's private property, so that he can have his 'wall' built before the 2020 election. That is an impeachable offense...and it looks like it is right out of a dictator's 'playbook.'

    Leave a comment:

Latest Topics

Collapse

Working...
X