Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

No sh!t Sherlocks.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by CarpeDiem View Post

    I must have missed that sentence in the report and I find it hard to believe a research report mentions the phrase “fake news”

    Heres a link to it directly
    https://ppforum.ca/wp-content/upload...-1-Aug2019.pdf

    Please provide a quote from the report supporting your assertion that the report says “tv media spreads fake news”.
    Fake news is as good as misinformation or misinformed.
    Too literal much?

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Snowshoveler View Post

      Fake news is as good as misinformation or misinformed.
      Too literal much?
      Having a peckish day, are we now?
      The trout who swims against the current gets the most oxygen..

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Snowshoveler View Post

        Yikes I hit another nerve you’re all jumpy lately.
        The report by a Liberal group isn’t good enough for you now?
        I already gave one example how the media has portrayed the yellow vest movement to be they’re the Turds mouthpiece.
        Also in the report is that people who only get their information from social media sources like Facebook and Twitter are also misinformed about the facts on the issues.
        Who is the most famous Twitter user proves your point
        "Ask not what your country can do for you"

        Left wing, Right Wing same bird that they are killing.

        you’re entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Snowshoveler View Post

          Fake news is as good as misinformation or misinformed.
          Too literal much?
          No it’s not.
          The original post was a misrepresentation of what the article said and you’ve doubled down on that since. It’s now obvious that advancing your own bias and agenda takes precedence over accuracy and honest use of sources. When asked to elaborate or provide sources, you go off topic , get personal or continue to avoid the issue.

          Im finished trying to have a rational debate about this subject.

          Good luck

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by CarpeDiem View Post

            No it’s not.
            The original post was a misrepresentation of what the article said and you’ve doubled down on that since. It’s now obvious that advancing your own bias and agenda takes precedence over accuracy and honest use of sources. When asked to elaborate or provide sources, you go off topic , get personal or continue to avoid the issue.

            Im finished trying to have a rational debate about this subject.

            Good luck
            Fine with me.

            Comment

            Latest Topics

            Collapse

            Working...
            X