Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Terrorist Sympathizers

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post

    Where in that post do I say anything to the contrary??? I know their history and do not deny their racism.
    Everywhere, every time you try to lay it all off on Trump. You've got a ton of guilt going on there.
    Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post

      Everywhere, every time you try to lay it all off on Trump. You've got a ton of guilt going on there.
      Then you should easily be able to foster a quote of mine where I said democrats weren't supporters of slavery. Failure to do so will be an admission of simply talking out of your ass.
      "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
      - Benjamin Franklin

      The new right wing: hate Muslims, preaches tolerance for Nazis.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post

        I am not a democrat and I support the wall.

        As the article points out though, Trump is only interested in terrorism committed by certain people, as opposed to terrorism as a whole.
        No, you do not. Your posts are crystal clear in expressing your deep, anti-American sentiments., and you rejoice every time someone sticks it to the president (almost always the Democrats), even when he is trying to do what the Dems refuse to do - FIX SOMETHING FOR A CHANGE INSTEAD OF JUST BITCHING ABOUT CONSTANTLY.

        I worry a lot more about those who think like you do than I do the lunatic shooters and even the "terrorists" And you seem reluctant to even remember that your buddy Obama refused to even allow the word "terrorist' to be used.
        Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post

          No, you do not. Your posts are crystal clear in expressing your deep, anti-American sentiments., and you rejoice every time someone sticks it to the president (almost always the Democrats), even when he is trying to do what the Dems refuse to do - FIX SOMETHING FOR A CHANGE INSTEAD OF JUST BITCHING ABOUT CONSTANTLY.

          I worry a lot more about those who think like you do than I do the lunatic shooters and even the "terrorists" And you seem reluctant to even remember that your buddy Obama refused to even allow the word "terrorist' to be used.
          I know you worry more about the "others" despite your own being a bigger threat. That's the purpose of this thread. Further, I have applauded Trump on numerous occasion when he does well. But, you're too dimwitted and narrow-minded to acknowledge that. The thought of being objective isn't something that registers with a pawn.
          "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
          - Benjamin Franklin

          The new right wing: hate Muslims, preaches tolerance for Nazis.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Massena View Post

            Then quote your facts. If you cannot or will not, then it is merely your opinion and the CNN reporting will have to stand despite the prejudices you espouse to the media.
            I gave you the page number and Black hat quoted directly from the document. Those are facts, you refusing to read them does not make them an opinion.

            Millions are being mislead by shoddy journalism.
            "I don't discuss sitting presidents," Mattis tells NPR in an interview. "I believe that you owe a period of quiet."

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
              As the article points out though, Trump is only interested in terrorism committed by certain people, as opposed to terrorism as a whole.
              The article points out a lie. Read the document that CNN is referencing.....Trump is interested in stopping all forms of terrorism.
              "I don't discuss sitting presidents," Mattis tells NPR in an interview. "I believe that you owe a period of quiet."

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Massena View Post
                Former slaves went from bondage to sharecropping. How is that better? And being treated like second-class citizens without being able to vote or have the basic rights that other citizens had is little better than slavery.

                Perhaps you can explain that to me...?
                There were a lot of White Sharecroppers, including one set of my Great Grandparents. Surely you are not comparing them to the Ex-Slaves?
                Pruitt, you are truly an expert! Kelt06

                Have you been struck by the jawbone of an ASS lately?

                by Khepesh "This is the logic of Pruitt"

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post

                  I know you worry more about the "others" despite your own being a bigger threat. That's the purpose of this thread. Further, I have applauded Trump on numerous occasion when he does well. But, you're too dimwitted and narrow-minded to acknowledge that. The thought of being objective isn't something that registers with a pawn.
                  This thread has only exposed another lie by CNN. No need for you to insult MM.
                  "I don't discuss sitting presidents," Mattis tells NPR in an interview. "I believe that you owe a period of quiet."

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Nichols View Post

                    I gave you the page number and Black hat quoted directly from the document. Those are facts, you refusing to read them does not make them an opinion.

                    Millions are being mislead by shoddy journalism.
                    "Ask not what your country can do for you"

                    Left wing, Right Wing same bird that they are killing.

                    youíre entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Half Pint John View Post

                      This is another CNN false news thread, your can of soup fits perfectly with CNN, Fox, and the rest of the partisan MSM. Only this time it is pure CNN twisting the story.
                      "I don't discuss sitting presidents," Mattis tells NPR in an interview. "I believe that you owe a period of quiet."

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Stonewall_Jack View Post
                        Beto Turns off blue-collar Democrats with his anti-American talk. That being said the blue-collar Democrats wonít go for a guy like trump
                        I agree with the first statement, but I would contest the second somewhat. My area is full of blue-collar Democrats, and in my personal interactions and conversations with them I'm finding more and more openly admitting to jumping ship to Trump based on the real world economic impacts they're experiencing first hand, and the hyperbolic rhetoric run amok from their own party. Like '16, they may not admit it to a pollster or their Democrat friends, but come election time a lot will be checking a box they never checked before. Hard to gauge the real number, but the trend does appear to be growing around here.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post

                          Wrong conclusions. I do not have to stand against a lie by supporting Islamic terrorism. Islamic terrorism is an Islamic problem, and they are not trying to fix it. You need to start asking why not. Meanwhile, you are demanding white activism but not Muslim activism.
                          Itís totally the right conclusion. Muslims and Christians are the greatest people that ever lived they have shaped our world. Time to wake up brother because right now we are facing a Boomarang. Look at all that propaganda that we heard about Islamic radicals this jihadists that. Now the boomerang has come back and the media outlets are constantly using the word white supremacy.

                          Now you know kind of how it feels to be a Muslim and have to put up with propaganda
                          Long live the Lionheart! Please watch this video
                          https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=jRDwlR4zbEM
                          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3DBaY0RsxU
                          Accept the challenges so that you can feel the exhilaration of victory.

                          George S Patton

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Pruitt View Post

                            There were a lot of White Sharecroppers, including one set of my Great Grandparents. Surely you are not comparing them to the Ex-Slaves?
                            That's another subject altogether. If you would wish to talk about it-all to the good. But to mix and match the two isn't quite the same thing, now is it?

                            And some of my grandparents and great grandparents were immigrants...
                            We are not now that strength which in old days
                            Moved earth and heaven; that which we are we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts
                            Made weak by time and fate but strong in will
                            To strive to seek to find and not to yield.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Blackhat View Post
                              Racism, white supremacy, white nationalism has been used as a political cudgel to silence any opposition. That, to me, has become the primary problem. When any argument or counterpoint is dismissed out of hand as racist you force conflict and push back. That is where we have gotten to.

                              We made real sociological headway in the 60-70s when it comes to race relations and the removal of institutional barriers. We did it through talking honestly and openly, with people like MLK forwarding the charge. Now, claiming the appropriate "ism" or "phobia" is enough to disregard any arguments and shut down communication. That tactic seems to be the one the progressive left has chosen. The problem with that tactic is that it's self-defeating. Witness the video of the Democratic Socialist convention that just happened.

                              There will always be racism. It is naivete to think otherwise, but it's general prevalence and acceptance in a society is something that can be changed. We were headed that direction until racism got repurposed as a political weapon and a power and money grab a la Sharpton and the like. If you shut down dialog and demonize any contrary viewpoints, you force conflict as the only recourse, and I don't see that approach being taken from the conservative perspective. If one side considers me no different than a cross burning, lynching kkk member because I question the validity of, say, reparations, then you destroy any hope of civil discourse. The half of the country you appear to assume to be so racist that they can't be redeemed only want to be able to have conversations, not conflict.
                              2 things.

                              1. There's nothing for us to discuss. The people you need to have an open dialogue with are the people who are anti diversity and hostile towards diversity. Until then, there's nothing for you and I to discuss.

                              2. The more we talk the further apart we'll grow.

                              Also, political progress was made. Separate from cultural progress which was merely a facade. Laws do not change the way the general public thinks and behaves.

                              Keep in mind the political progress was the result of a vocal minority. The majority of Americans, according to polls of that time, did not like MLK. So do not invoke his name as though the majority of country rallied behind him and supported his cause. They did not.
                              "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
                              - Benjamin Franklin

                              The new right wing: hate Muslims, preaches tolerance for Nazis.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by Blackhat View Post
                                My area is full of blue-collar Democrats, and in my personal interactions and conversations with them I'm finding more and more openly admitting to jumping ship to Trump based on the real world economic impacts they're experiencing first hand, and the hyperbolic rhetoric run amok from their own party. Like '16, they may not admit it to a pollster or their Democrat friends, but come election time a lot will be checking a box they never checked before. Hard to gauge the real number, but the trend does appear to be growing around here.
                                I'm starting to notice that also on my weekend visits up there.
                                "I don't discuss sitting presidents," Mattis tells NPR in an interview. "I believe that you owe a period of quiet."

                                Comment

                                Latest Topics

                                Collapse

                                Working...
                                X