Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Director Mueller Speaks in Public for the First Time...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The whole obstruction blahblah was invented after Mueller's failure to prove collusion .
    And after the failure of obstruction, the Democrats will say that Trump's refusal to give them his tax returns is also a reason to impeach him ,and after that, they will invent something else .Desperate criminals never stop .

    Comment


    • Originally posted by inevtiab1e View Post
      Here you go, all impeachable offenses.

      You either support the constitution or do not.

      https://www.lawfareblog.com/obstruct...eport-heat-map
      A Deep Stater talking about supporting the Constitution
      Who was it who said that the First Amendment was obsolete? Who was it who wanted to lock up his political opponents ?

      Comment


      • If there were any impeachable offenses, the Democrats would have started impeachment already longtime ago .

        Comment


        • ^ Well Done (TAG)!


          From the "Lawfare" BLOG site itself,their About page illustrating the subjective and Left leaning orientation of what they present;
          https://www.lawfareblog.com/about-la...-term-and-site

          For those with more objective and open minds than the pair of klowns posting above, here's a relevant examination of a key Constitution concept; High Crimes and Misdemeanors

          ...
          The U.S. Constitution provides impeachment as the method for removing the president, vice president, federal judges, and other federal officials from office. The impeachment process begins in the House of Representatives and follows these steps:
          1. The House Judiciary Committee holds hearings and, if necessary, prepares articles of impeachment. These are the charges against the official.
          2. If a majority of the committee votes to approve the articles, the whole House debates and votes on them.
          3. If a majority of the House votes to impeach the official on any article, then the official must then stand trial in the Senate.
          4. For the official to be removed from office, two-thirds of the Senate must vote to convict the official. Upon conviction, the official is automatically removed from office and, if the Senate so decides, may be forbidden from holding governmental office again.

          The impeachment process is political in nature, not criminal. Congress has no power to impose criminal penalties on impeached officials. But criminal courts may try and punish officials if they have committed crimes.

          The Constitution sets specific grounds for impeachment. They are “treason, bribery, and other high crimes and misdemeanors.” To be impeached and removed from office, the House and Senate must find that the official committed one of these acts.
          ...
          The convention adopted “high crimes and misdemeanors” with little discussion. Most of the framers knew the phrase well. Since 1386, the English parliament had used “high crimes and misdemeanors” as one of the grounds to impeach officials of the crown. Officials accused of “high crimes and misdemeanors” were accused of offenses as varied as misappropriating government funds, appointing unfit subordinates, not prosecuting cases, not spending money allocated by Parliament, promoting themselves ahead of more deserving candidates, threatening a grand jury, disobeying an order from Parliament, arresting a man to keep him from running for Parliament, losing a ship by neglecting to moor it, helping “suppress petitions to the King to call a Parliament,” granting warrants without cause, and bribery. Some of these charges were crimes. Others were not. The one common denominator in all these accusations was that the official had somehow abused the power of his office and was unfit to serve.

          After the Constitutional Convention, the Constitution had to be ratified by the states. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay wrote a series of essays, known as the Federalist Papers, urging support of the Constitution. In Federalist No. 65, Hamilton explained impeachment. He defined impeachable offenses as “those offences which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or in other words from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself.”

          ...
          https://www.crf-usa.org/impeachment/...demeanors.html

          "crf" = Constitutional Rights Foundation - a more informed and correct source than either "Massena" or "inevtiab1e".
          TANSTAAFL = There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch

          Comment


          • Originally posted by ljadw View Post

            A Deep Stater talking about supporting the Constitution
            Who was it who said that the First Amendment was obsolete? Who was it who wanted to lock up his political opponents ?
            Hypocrisy and un-Constitutional acts and positions are common to socialists and leftists such as shown.
            TANSTAAFL = There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch

            Comment


            • Originally posted by ljadw View Post
              If there were any impeachable offenses, the Democrats would have started impeachment already longtime ago .
              No, they would not have because they cannot win in the Senate.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Massena View Post

                No, they would not have because they cannot win in the Senate.
                They very well might not get the votes in the House either...

                Comment


                • And...?

                  Comment


                  • . All that you are apparently able to do is answer material with derogatory personal comments that just are not true. You have the nasty habit of falsely accusing someone with whom you disagree
                    Much like you guys on the Left, unsubstantiated accusations vs those on the right.


                    Originally posted by inevtiab1e View Post
                    Here you go, all impeachable offenses.

                    You either support the constitution or do not.

                    https://www.lawfareblog.com/obstruct...eport-heat-map
                    You don't really understand the constitution do you?
                    EVERYTHING is an impeachable offence, as the standard is whatever Congress believes it is.

                    His spreadsheet was regarding potential prosecutable crimes, not grounds for impeachment.

                    He's also confused "intent" with "corrupt intent" which is the actual standard.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by ljadw View Post

                      Lawfareblog is very leftwing liberal . Its director and the writer of the article have worked for the Wapo (= the propagana newspaper of ISIS ). It is also a part of the Brookings Institution which is funded by people as Soros .
                      That's a summary of Volume II. All impeachable offenses according to evidence obtained by the FBI.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by ljadw View Post

                        A Deep Stater talking about supporting the Constitution
                        Who was it who said that the First Amendment was obsolete? Who was it who wanted to lock up his political opponents ?
                        Deep state is a conspiracy theory pushed by RW radicals.
                        I don't know who said the 1A was obsolete.
                        I don't know who wanted to lock up political opponents.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Freebird View Post

                          Much like you guys on the Left, unsubstantiated accusations vs those on the right.




                          You don't really understand the constitution do you?
                          EVERYTHING is an impeachable offence, as the standard is whatever Congress believes it is.

                          His spreadsheet was regarding potential prosecutable crimes, not grounds for impeachment.

                          He's also confused "intent" with "corrupt intent" which is the actual standard.
                          The FBI laid out 10+ impeachable offenses with detailed evidence. It's up to congress to do the right thing and not allow a lawless president to get away with it. That's not what our Founding Fathers wanted.

                          Anyways, if Obama did 1 of these 10 things republicans would be doing their best to impeach.

                          You either support the constitutional process or do not.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by inevtiab1e View Post

                            Deep state is a conspiracy theory pushed by RW radicals.
                            I don't know who said the 1A was obsolete.
                            I don't know who wanted to lock up political opponents.
                            1 Bill Kristol ( fan of Hillary ) said : I prefer Ds to Trump State
                            Dana Bash ( from CNN ) said : DS will go after Trump
                            Ph.Mudd (from CIA/FBI ) said : we will kill Trump
                            2 The NYT
                            3 Robert Kennedy Jr ( not a RW radical )

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by inevtiab1e View Post

                              That's a summary of Volume II. All impeachable offenses according to evidence obtained by the FBI.
                              The Few but Infamous,who conspired against Trump ?

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by inevtiab1e View Post

                                The FBI laid out 10+ impeachable offenses with detailed evidence. It's up to congress to do the right thing and not allow a lawless president to get away with it. That's not what our Founding Fathers wanted.

                                Anyways, if Obama did 1 of these 10 things republicans would be doing their best to impeach.

                                You either support the constitutional process or do not.
                                Obama did not do 1 of these things, not 10 of these things but hundreds of these things .

                                Comment

                                Latest Topics

                                Collapse

                                Working...
                                X