Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

America Risks Missing Out On A Global Nuclear Power Revival

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    One mistake people are making is the assumption that the environmental movement is made up of good faith actors. In reality large parts of the environmental movement is made up of people that are much less interested in human prosperity than being "priests" in a kind of nature worshiping cult.
    We hunt the hunters

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by wolfhnd View Post

      I was serious, burning coal doesn't bother me that much.

      Molten salt is not impractical, do you know anything about it?

      Molten salt reactors are perfectly safe technology to export because no material that could be used for nuclear weapons is produced. Giving the technology to the nations that currently have nuclear reactors would make the world safer because they cannot melt down.



      https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...87850713000101
      I'm familiar with the proposed thorium liquid reactors.
      Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

      Comment


      • #18
        Nuclear cannot be allowed to solve the climate change problem because nuclear is far, far to deadly. After Chernobyl killed billions and billions and billions of people we cannot risk a repeat.

        It's bad enough we had Fukushima. Is everyone aware that since the Fukushima incident all the fish taken from the ocean and eaten by humans are now dead? It's a marine holocaust.

        It really makes you question those who preach that climate change is going to destroy the planet unless we stop emitting carbon into the atmosphere. The whole of humanity is facing death and destruction. But somehow the large scale adoption of nuclear energy, our sure fire way of massively reducing carbon emissions, is too risky.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Jazsa View Post
          Nuclear cannot be allowed to solve the climate change problem because nuclear is far, far to deadly. After Chernobyl killed billions and billions and billions of people we cannot risk a repeat.

          It's bad enough we had Fukushima. Is everyone aware that since the Fukushima incident all the fish taken from the ocean and eaten by humans are now dead? It's a marine holocaust.

          It really makes you question those who preach that climate change is going to destroy the planet unless we stop emitting carbon into the atmosphere. The whole of humanity is facing death and destruction. But somehow the large scale adoption of nuclear energy, our sure fire way of massively reducing carbon emissions, is too risky.
          Chernobyl did no such thing. Neither did Fukishima cause a wave of human deaths.

          You need to seriously check your facts.
          Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post

            Chernobyl did no such thing. Neither did Fukishima cause a wave of human deaths.

            You need to seriously check your facts.
            Or sanity
            We hunt the hunters

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by wolfhnd View Post

              Or sanity
              Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Jazsa View Post
                Nuclear cannot be allowed to solve the climate change problem because nuclear is far, far to deadly. After Chernobyl killed billions and billions and billions of people we cannot risk a repeat.

                It's bad enough we had Fukushima. Is everyone aware that since the Fukushima incident all the fish taken from the ocean and eaten by humans are now dead? It's a marine holocaust.

                It really makes you question those who preach that climate change is going to destroy the planet unless we stop emitting carbon into the atmosphere. The whole of humanity is facing death and destruction. But somehow the large scale adoption of nuclear energy, our sure fire way of massively reducing carbon emissions, is too risky.
                /facepalm
                The First Amendment applies to SMS, Emails, Blogs, online news, the Fourth applies to your cell phone, computer, and your car, but the Second only applies to muskets?

                Comment

                Latest Topics

                Collapse

                Working...
                X