Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Need to Impeach (Movement)

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Need to Impeach (Movement)

    I was served my first Need to Impeach advertisement today on the internet. There is something seriously wrong with out educational system when 8 million people can't understand that the Russian collusion narrative was hatched to deflect from the Uranium One scandal and other Clinton public relation disasters.

    Donald Trump's 10 Impeachable Offenses



    https://www.needtoimpeach.com/impeac...gaAiIeEALw_wcB


    I'm not going to even bother going into how absurd the list is. What drives this insanity is 50 years of socialism lite failing to achieve almost all of it's objectives accept ending absolute poverty. Instead of reevaluating the programs that have failed to improve the educational system, end minority crime and poverty, improve the quality of life for women, end foreign wars, reduce income inequality, reform Wall Street, end banksterism, eliminate racial discord, and all the other things liberals thought they would do when they had power they are doubling down. Like a gambling addict they are going for just a little bit more with the illogical faith that all the losses will be overturned. If the system was not groaning under the weight of public debt it would only be a case of cognitive dissonance but this is something more serious. It has become a full blown mental illness in which any opposition is seen as an existential threat.

    With the end of the cold war capitalism has dramatically reduced poverty throughout the world. In 1984 42 percent of the world's population live in absolute poverty today that number is around 10 percent. In the developed world racism has been largely eliminated, women make up 70 percent of college students, the standard of living has never been higher, great progress has been made in treating many diseases, the list goes on but if you ask people they will tell you that things are going badly. The question is why are peoples impression of the state of our societies so out of wack with reality. Could it be that if an honest appraisal was had that the millions of activists our universities have produced would be out of a job or if not a job a justification for their secular religion?

    The one threat that liberals are not worried about that could actually end our civilization is the financial burden of public debt. The connection between bread and circus and devalued currency is a long established historical pattern and has recently repeated itself in Valenzuela. If the collapse of the Soviet Union wasn't evidence enough that the indoctrination most of the population received in universities was psychological abuse surely the vacuousness of the economics major Alexandria Ocasio Cortez should be a clue. An economic collapse in itself would not be enough to ruin a civilization but when combined with a population raised on safe spaces and participation trophies it could be. The reaction to Trump who a few decades earlier could have passed for a right of center Democrat proves that the population is emotionally weak and unstable. No comparison could be made to the self activated generation that survived the great depression without tearing society apart. All it takes now to burn down a city is a lie about a thug named Michael Brown. The social justice cult is cultural vandalism and repeats the same excesses that religions always do. You can consider the source in the following quote but cults and book burning is a common correlation.

    At Alexandria in 389, Bishop Theophilus of Alexandria personally directed the destruction of the temple to the god Serapis, reputedly the largest place of worship in the known world. The statue of the god was chopped up and burned, its head being carried through the town for public ridicule. The temple precinct, or Serapeum, also housed a scientific research institute (a "Museum" named after the nine Muses) and the famous Library of Alexandria - two of the greatest academic buildings in human history. Both buildings were loathed by Christians, who hated scientific research and secular knowledge as much as they hated other people's places of worship. Both Museum and Library were destroyed around this time, probably in the same violent incident in which the bishop destroyed the temple. The destruction of the Serapeum by Patriarch Theophilus was a critical event in the history of persecution of ancient paganism. A later bishop of the same city, Saint Cyril was responsible for the murder of the pholosopher Hypatia.
    http://www.badnewsaboutchristianity...._vandalism.htm

    It's not surprising that Trump is the allegorical Serapis for whom the social justice cult has unleashed it's all consuming hatred. His indifference for the revealed truths that the indoctrinated hold dear is like the Romans who worshiped Serapis before him worse than actual persecution. It is a strange characteristic of humans that they prefer being hated to being ignored. By any means necessary is likely to be the last thing uttered before the light of civilization is extinguished.



    We hunt the hunters

  • #2
    There is no need to attempt to impeach Trump. It would be against the best interests of the nation. He needs to be beaten in an election, not removed by impeachment.
    We are not now that strength which in old days
    Moved earth and heaven; that which we are we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts
    Made weak by time and fate but strong in will
    To strive to seek to find and not to yield.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Massena View Post
      There is no need to attempt to impeach Trump. It would be against the best interests of the nation. He needs to be beaten in an election, not removed by impeachment.
      Just a hypothetical... What if he wins in 2020? He couldn't run again and you get four more years of him. Now what?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by wolfhnd View Post
        I was served my first Need to Impeach advertisement today on the internet. There is something seriously wrong with out educational system when 8 million people can't understand that the Russian collusion narrative was hatched to deflect from the Uranium One scandal and other Clinton public relation disasters.
        I think it shows there is something wrong with our educational system every time you post another Conservative conspiracy theory. I'm pretty sure that pretty soon, you'll be posting another one about AOC or the new Muslim law maker.

        On my weekly phone call with my mother (she's 78) she told me she overhead to old ladies in line in front of her talk about how Michelle Obama was secretly a man. And they believed it. So, there's another one you can post.

        Conservatives in the U.S. won't be happy until Jim Crow returns and "White Heterosexual Only" signs are legalized.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post

          Just a hypothetical... What if he wins in 2020? He couldn't run again and you get four more years of him. Now what?
          Then he wins. I'm actually not worried about that, though. I'm more worried about putting the best candidate forward for the Dem's side.
          Conservatives in the U.S. won't be happy until Jim Crow returns and "White Heterosexual Only" signs are legalized.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Anthrax View Post

            Then he wins. I'm actually not worried about that, though. I'm more worried about putting the best candidate forward for the Dem's side.
            Well, they still have to find one. Their current crop really doesn't stand a chance. The current issues / platform they're running on is a total bust.

            The Green New Deal... Higher energy costs, scarcity, and more taxes... not to mention the more Socialist aspects...
            Medicare for all... Like an even bigger government takeover of health care than Obamacare did will be so much better and cost less...
            Tax the... Well, more taxes...

            Right now they're all about more government, big government, more taxes. That isn't a winning platform.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post

              Just a hypothetical... What if he wins in 2020? He couldn't run again and you get four more years of him. Now what?
              More complaining and whining?
              The First Amendment applies to SMS, Emails, Blogs, online news, the Fourth applies to your cell phone, computer, and your car, but the Second only applies to muskets?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Anthrax View Post

                Then he wins. I'm actually not worried about that, though. I'm more worried about putting the best candidate forward for the Dem's side.
                And which of those socialist dictators are you offering up for our consideration? Your party is, after all, the Anti-American Party.
                Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post

                  Just a hypothetical... What if he wins in 2020? He couldn't run again and you get four more years of him. Now what?
                  Maybe the Democrats will be forced to do their jobs for a change? Maybe we can imprison Clinton? Maybe Pelosi can take time off to finish her ex-change? Maybe Horseface Ocasio can go back to school?

                  Trump isn't the problem - the anti-American Democrats are.

                  We can only hope.
                  Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The Uranium One scandal…………..
                    Jeez.
                    Must be a goddarn awefull scandal. Lots of heads must have rolled by now…….

                    Oh no, these heads didn't roll, 'cause you know, so far the scandal is just in a few people's minds:
                    Despite nearly three years of discussion and analysis of the matter — as well as an FBI investigation — no evidence of any quid pro quo or other wrong-doing has surfaced.
                    Oh, and wait a minute:
                    Numerous Republican politicians and pundits, including President Donald Trump, have insisted that the Clinton-Uranium One story is the "real" Russian scandal, rather than the matters for which the Trump administration is being investigated.
                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_One_controversy

                    Hm, wait another minute. The President of the United States is not able to bring the alleged perpetrators of said Scandal (if not Betrayal of American Values) to Justice? They so far have not been able to bring forth remotely substantial evidence? O my, my.

                    Yeah, I know. Deep State. Soros. FBI.

                    You guys are and always will remain hilarious.

                    The Uranium One Scandal………

                    "For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return"

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Rutger View Post
                      The Uranium One scandal…………..
                      Jeez.
                      Must be a goddarn awefull scandal. Lots of heads must have rolled by now…….

                      Oh no, these heads didn't roll, 'cause you know, so far the scandal is just in a few people's minds:


                      Oh, and wait a minute:


                      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_One_controversy

                      Hm, wait another minute. The President of the United States is not able to bring the alleged perpetrators of said Scandal (if not Betrayal of American Values) to Justice? They so far have not been able to bring forth remotely substantial evidence? O my, my.

                      Yeah, I know. Deep State. Soros. FBI.

                      You guys are and always will remain hilarious.

                      The Uranium One Scandal………
                      Yeah, you Dummycrats have serious issues with reality. Maybe you can make the families of the guys murdered in Benghazi laugh while you're at it.
                      Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Anthrax View Post

                        Then he wins. I'm actually not worried about that, though. I'm more worried about putting the best candidate forward for the Dem's side.
                        good luck with that. I'm still waiting...…..

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by jeffdoorgunnr View Post

                          good luck with that. I'm still waiting...…..
                          Hopefully, you're not holding your breath.
                          Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            The left is constantly circling the wagons to protect the worst among them. Like the National Socialists they only really believe in power. Like other religions they need a supreme authority to protect the revealed truth of social justice. They don't really seem to mind if that authority is vested in sociopaths such as Mao, Stalin or Clinton. Why this psychological phenomenon repeats itself is probably related to tribal instincts.

                            I was watching a documentary on Jordon Peterson and it ended with commentary from a leftist intellectual. His take was that Peterson's advise to teach children discipline was proof that Peterson was an authoritarian at heart. He went on to say Peterson was a hypocrite because he criticizes leftist regimes and Marx but never talks about the horrors of Christianity. The glaring logical fallacy is the appeal to purity compounded by a lack of self awareness. It would be nice if the left was slightly more sophisticated.

                            Christianity originated as an eschatological cult focused on reforming Judaism. It's connecting to political theory does not go beyond the fact that Judaism was at the time theocratic where law and religion were inseparable. As far as we can tell from the text it was anti authoritarian to the extent that it criticized the ruling priesthood. The focus was on the individual's relationship with God not the state. Marxism on the other hand is all about the collective dictatorship of the proletariat. The individual has no personal relationship with the state God because their identity is defined by class or in it's current manifestation race, gender, sex, ethnicity, etc.

                            The key to understanding why comparing Christian atrocities to Marxists atrocities is sophomoric can be summed up in two words, Roman Catholic. The Christian cult spread rapidly through the Roman empire because Rome was nothing if not authoritarian. The message of an individual relationship with a loving God must have been very appealing to people use to a God emperor who was anything but loving. To deal with the anarchy of a doctrine that had no central authority one was created.

                            When people talk of Western Civilization being Judeo-Christian they ignore the schizophrenic relationship between the original dogma and the political reality. Once you call yourself Roman you have embraced an authoritarian mantle. Western Civilization is primarily Greco-Roman not Judeo-Christian from the political perspective. At least in it's origins Christianity was apolitical. That is the Judeo-Christianity that Peterson is talking to. I find his separation of Judaism from theocracy somewhat disconcerting but his focus on the logos makes it acceptable.

                            There are so many lies in the Marxist narrative it is hard to single one out. As it relates to this discussion the primary misleading dogma is that a democratic dictatorship is logically superior to liberal democracy. It is the source of the cognitive dissonance that allows socialist states to become actual dictatorships. The second is the mischaracterization of Marxism as primarily an economic theory. Marxism cannot be implemented without authoritarian political control. It is a secular religion in the sense that it requires acceptance of the revealed truth of social justice. As political philosophy it is dismal because it relies on it's revealed truths to be self evident. It appeals to tribal instincts of the worst kind because it is obsessed with the collective identity by class. It appeals to academics because of their sense that their tribe has been unjustly slighted in the social power structures. There is no mystery as to why it is so parasitic or popular.





                            We hunt the hunters

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              When you get an Impeach e-mail, do what I do and send back an Imprison Clinton e-mail in return. Be sure and send copies to the local Dummycrat headquarters.
                              Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              Working...
                              X