Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Michelle Malkin-The Screeching Harpie

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Michelle Malkin-The Screeching Harpie

    Malkin attacked John McCain at CPAC. She isn't fit to shine his shoes:

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...cid=spartandhp

  • #2
    Did she say anything untruthful? Did she lie?
    "Stand for the flag ~ Kneel for the fallen"

    "A wise man can learn more from a foolish question than a fool can learn from a wise answer." ~ Bruce Lee

    Comment


    • #3
      She made a shameful personal attack upon someone who could not reply and with whom she disagreed. And in the end McCain was right in his decision.

      She mischaracterized McCain, so in effect she did lie. McCain served the country long and faithfully. All Malkin has done is run her big mouth. Among her other 'journalistic' endeavors, she founded a website, aptly named 'Hot Air.'

      She'd fit right in here with some of you who support Trump and who routinely personally attack those with whom you disagree.

      Comment


      • #4
        John McCain's historical legacy is likely to be a footnote that says he was a never Trump Republican.

        While he was busy tilting at windmills the country was being transformed into one where half the population tentatively endorses Alexandria Ocasio Cortez. While Obama was wrecking the economy and foreign policy McCain was busy trying to ensure more of the same by opposing Trump. I don't think we can afford any more McCains. His approach to politics ensured that the Republican party was going to increasingly become irrelevant.

        It is important to exercise that ghost of John McCain to ensure the Republican party has a future and the country one in which the word socialism is only used jokingly.
        We hunt the hunters

        Comment


        • #5
          Who would ever want to be a 'Trump Republican'?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Massena View Post
            She made a shameful personal attack upon someone who could not reply and with whom she disagreed. And in the end McCain was right in his decision.

            She mischaracterized McCain, so in effect she did lie. McCain served the country long and faithfully. All Malkin has done is run her big mouth. Among her other 'journalistic' endeavors, she founded a website, aptly named 'Hot Air.'

            She'd fit right in here with some of you who support Trump and who routinely personally attack those with whom you disagree.
            McCain was always very much a Left of Center Republican. He was elected in what is really a purple state, and maintained his seat because he voted as much with Democrats as Republicans much of the time. His vote was the deciding one that derailed a bill that would have ended Obamacare. I found that disgraceful.
            His runs for President were exercises in mediocrity. Like Romney, he let Obama off the hook in their debates. McCain was the only Republican in the Keating Five scandal.

            So, don't try some piety on me about him. McCain was anything but a saint. He had a vicious and vindictive temper. He was just another Washington politician that had been there far too long.

            Comment


            • #7
              McCain was seriously weird, and of little use to others.

              He is no loss to anyone.
              Any man can hold his place when the bands play and women throw flowers; it is when the enemy presses close and metal shears through the ranks that one can acertain which are soldiers, and which are not.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Massena View Post
                Who would ever want to be a 'Trump Republican'?
                Who would every want to be a Hillary Clinton (or AOC) Democrat ?

                Or a Bernie Sanders Socialist Democrat ???
                TANSTAAFL = There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Massena View Post
                  Malkin attacked John McCain at CPAC. She isn't fit to shine his shoes:

                  https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...cid=spartandhp
                  From your OP link;
                  Quote;
                  " During an anti-immigration speech at CPAC on Friday, Malkin mentioned McCain while describing how she thought Republican leadership was not doing a sufficient job dealing with immigration.

                  “And yes, I’m looking at you, the ghost of John McCain,” Malkin said, receiving a standing ovation from the crowd. “It’s the GOP sellouts, not just the radical open-borders left that is in bed with immigration saboteurs,” she added. “Those are the real grifters.”
                  "
                  ...

                  May not set well with those ready to give our country away, but hardly "screeching" or "harpie"; unless one is a socialist democrat.
                  TANSTAAFL = There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by G David Bock View Post

                    From your OP link;
                    Quote;
                    " During an anti-immigration speech at CPAC on Friday, Malkin mentioned McCain while describing how she thought Republican leadership was not doing a sufficient job dealing with immigration.

                    “And yes, I’m looking at you, the ghost of John McCain,” Malkin said, receiving a standing ovation from the crowd. “It’s the GOP sellouts, not just the radical open-borders left that is in bed with immigration saboteurs,” she added. “Those are the real grifters.”
                    "
                    ...

                    May not set well with those ready to give our country away, but hardly "screeching" or "harpie"; unless one is a socialist democrat.
                    Have you ever heard her speak on television? The characterization of a screeching harpie is right on the money.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Massena View Post

                      Have you ever heard her speak on television? The characterization of a screeching harpie is right on the money.
                      It's been a while, I don't do TV much. I don't recall her being as hard on the ears as SHillary.

                      Text of your opening post and #3 here show your issue is with her message(and Conservative political leanings), not her delivery or speaking style ~ packaging over content. However, denigrating a person's speaking style (packaging) tends to be a common trait among left leaning liberals.
                      TANSTAAFL = There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Massena View Post

                        Have you ever heard her speak on television? The characterization of a screeching harpie is right on the money.
                        Do you have some examples?

                        Here's some I found. None of them could be characterized as her being a "screeching harpie." (sic)

                        https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2218062228517681

                        https://www.facebook.com/CRTV/videos...8606947540117/





                        Now, I can say she does bloviate some, using some rather colorful ad hominems and lots of big adjectives, but that hardly rises to "screeching harpy."


                        Comment


                        • #13
                          She's a professional political troll (a degenerate like all pundits) who is one of the GOP's "Anti-minority interest minorities'. As expected she eloped with a big whitey'.
                          Zhitomir-Berdichev, West of Kiev: 24 Dec 1943-31 Jan 1944
                          Stalin's Favorite: The Combat History of the 2nd Guards Tank Army
                          Barbarossa Derailed I & II
                          Battle of Kalinin October 1941

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            So the normal Uncle Tom accusation. Your post is just too stupid for any consideration as discussion. Have you hugged a snowflake today?
                            Flag: USA / Location: West Coast

                            Prayers.

                            BoRG

                            http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/8757/snap1ws8.jpg

                            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PtsX_Z3CMU

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Cult Icon View Post
                              She's a professional political troll (a degenerate like all pundits) who is one of the GOP's "Anti-minority interest minorities'. As expected she eloped with a big whitey'.
                              Racist, sexist comment from the left. Typical of their nature...
                              Credo quia absurdum.


                              Quantum mechanics describes nature as absurd from the point of view of common sense. And yet it fully agrees with experiment. So I hope you can accept nature as She is - absurd! - Richard Feynman

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              Working...
                              X