Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trump Supporters Mock Native American Marchers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nichols
    replied
    TactiKill Jr, you failed completely with this racist thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • TactiKill J.
    replied
    Originally posted by G David Bock View Post

    "Tactikill J." I'd also personalize this response and address you by your real name, but seems after ten years here you have yet to show the guts to provide such in your 'Profile'. What's that say about your integrity?
    Who cares? I don't even remember what's in my profile. My name is Jay.

    You mean "laymans" ???
    Auto-spell. Nice catch.


    Could this be another indication of your shortfall in guts and integrity, not being able to "come out with it" and be specific?
    Since I got that from you on another thread, I'll post that reply here in case you don't see it there;
    Just no need to state the obvious.

    As for "Muslims", they are neither a race nor an ethnic, and considering their spread around the planet they include nearly every one of such. But as usual, and this is typical of most liberals whom have mush for brains, you have confused opposition to an ideology(Islam) with opposition to those encompassed by it(Muslims). I doubt the following will register with your mindset, but for benefit of others reading here, it may help.

    Before Cortes arrived, the Aztecs practiced a religion that focused on human sacrifice as a key ritual - cutting the heart out of a living victim upon the altar of their temples. Not all Native Americans in hat we now call Mexico were "Aztecs". There were several tribes conquered and dominated by the Aztecs and some of these allied with Cortes to overthrow the Aztecs and remove their religion/ideology from power. Most would agree that the Aztec religion proves a case that 'not all religions are equal' or should be protected by the first Amendment of the USA Constitution.

    The Nazis - National Socialist German Workers Party/NSDAP was an ideology with philosophical roots in some German mystical beliefs, the Thule and Vril
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occultism_in_Nazism
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thule
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vril
    Even though most think of Nazism as a political party, it was also a quasi-religion, however many find nothing wrong in being opposed to Nazism or Nazis. While this belief system and political party dominated German, WWII wasn't fought against the Germans for "racial" reason; hatred of Germans, but rather in opposition to Nazism. Oskar Schindler is a classic example of one compelled to become "a Nazi" in order to continue to do business with the German government of the time, but as we see from either the book or movie about him, he neither believed the Nazi ideology nor operated per it's principles and agenda, and tried to twart it where he could.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oskar_Schindler

    In the case of Islam, we have a religion; ideology with deity attached, which dominates the political structure of many countries, having their "secular" law based upon Sharia Law. Islam also dominates the culture of those many "Islamic/Muslim" countries. Islam, which stands for 'submit to Sharia', does not support equal rights to all, especially of non-Islamic religions; places women in second-class status, endorses slavery, and has many other aspects contrary to modern social and political standards. It also proscribes death to any whom denounce and/or leave the religion. Hence there are many people in the world whom are "Muslim" buy duress rather than choice. We could say there are many Muslims whom are "Schindlers" within their societies.

    In many ways Islam and Nazism shared similar tenants and ideology, so differ mostly in minor theological detail and deities. My position is to oppose the ideology and theology of Islam as much as I would that of Nazism. Now if Islam could find a way to strike and refute some of the text of it's dogma that is unacceptable to 21st century legal and cultural standards of equality and tolerance, I won't mind it so much. But so long as it is forced upon those within the Dar al-Islam, and so long as it battles against the Dar Al-Haram in agenda (per Koran) to convert the rest of the world to Islam, I'm going to have some issues and problems with accepting or tolerating what is just another flavor of Nazism.

    If you bother to read the first few pages of posts in the following thread link you'll get more of the specifics on my position regards Islam.
    Islam - Jihad - GWOT

    BTW, it is arrogance and ignorance that is the core basis of beliefs and foolish socialist policies, along with elitism and racism that are foundation of most Liberals and their Democratic Party.
    https://forums.armchairgeneral.com/f...ed-right/page3
    I don't have that much free time right now. But just because they're not a race does not mean it's ok to generalize them. The word bigot exist and carries a negative connotation for a reason. Per usual, all you've done is explain why you're a bigot.

    Leave a comment:


  • G David Bock
    replied
    Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post

    David.
    "Tactikill J." I'd also personalize this response and address you by your real name, but seems after ten years here you have yet to show the guts to provide such in your 'Profile'. What's that say about your integrity?

    Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
    To put in layams terms for you.
    You mean "laymans" ???

    Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
    You obviously know what group of people I'm referring to and a bigot is no better than a racist, they both share the same mentality of generalized hatred, intolerance and ignorance. Hatred that you proudly flaunt btw. The only difference is your target, so no you have no business accusing anyone of racism when you're one of the most hateful people on this forum.

    Actually given the similarities I would not be surprised if you were both, but I have not alleged that.
    Could this be another indication of your shortfall in guts and integrity, not being able to "come out with it" and be specific?
    Since I got that from you on another thread, I'll post that reply here in case you don't see it there;

    As for "Muslims", they are neither a race nor an ethnic, and considering their spread around the planet they include nearly every one of such. But as usual, and this is typical of most liberals whom have mush for brains, you have confused opposition to an ideology(Islam) with opposition to those encompassed by it(Muslims). I doubt the following will register with your mindset, but for benefit of others reading here, it may help.

    Before Cortes arrived, the Aztecs practiced a religion that focused on human sacrifice as a key ritual - cutting the heart out of a living victim upon the altar of their temples. Not all Native Americans in hat we now call Mexico were "Aztecs". There were several tribes conquered and dominated by the Aztecs and some of these allied with Cortes to overthrow the Aztecs and remove their religion/ideology from power. Most would agree that the Aztec religion proves a case that 'not all religions are equal' or should be protected by the first Amendment of the USA Constitution.

    The Nazis - National Socialist German Workers Party/NSDAP was an ideology with philosophical roots in some German mystical beliefs, the Thule and Vril
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occultism_in_Nazism
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thule
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vril
    Even though most think of Nazism as a political party, it was also a quasi-religion, however many find nothing wrong in being opposed to Nazism or Nazis. While this belief system and political party dominated German, WWII wasn't fought against the Germans for "racial" reason; hatred of Germans, but rather in opposition to Nazism. Oskar Schindler is a classic example of one compelled to become "a Nazi" in order to continue to do business with the German government of the time, but as we see from either the book or movie about him, he neither believed the Nazi ideology nor operated per it's principles and agenda, and tried to twart it where he could.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oskar_Schindler

    In the case of Islam, we have a religion; ideology with deity attached, which dominates the political structure of many countries, having their "secular" law based upon Sharia Law. Islam also dominates the culture of those many "Islamic/Muslim" countries. Islam, which stands for 'submit to Sharia', does not support equal rights to all, especially of non-Islamic religions; places women in second-class status, endorses slavery, and has many other aspects contrary to modern social and political standards. It also proscribes death to any whom denounce and/or leave the religion. Hence there are many people in the world whom are "Muslim" buy duress rather than choice. We could say there are many Muslims whom are "Schindlers" within their societies.

    In many ways Islam and Nazism shared similar tenants and ideology, so differ mostly in minor theological detail and deities. My position is to oppose the ideology and theology of Islam as much as I would that of Nazism. Now if Islam could find a way to strike and refute some of the text of it's dogma that is unacceptable to 21st century legal and cultural standards of equality and tolerance, I won't mind it so much. But so long as it is forced upon those within the Dar al-Islam, and so long as it battles against the Dar Al-Haram in agenda (per Koran) to convert the rest of the world to Islam, I'm going to have some issues and problems with accepting or tolerating what is just another flavor of Nazism.

    If you bother to read the first few pages of posts in the following thread link you'll get more of the specifics on my position regards Islam.
    Islam - Jihad - GWOT

    BTW, it is arrogance and ignorance that is the core basis of beliefs and foolish socialist policies, along with elitism and racism that are foundation of most Liberals and their Democratic Party.
    https://forums.armchairgeneral.com/f...ed-right/page3

    Leave a comment:


  • Cambronnne
    replied
    Originally posted by Nichols View Post

    That's easy......get your 'facts' by reading crap like this:

    Nothing says white privilege like being a self-satisfied ******* wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat and impeding the path of a Native American activist; and then, when called out on said assholishness, suing the billionaire owner of the Washington Post (when every damn paper in America wrote about that story) for $250 million.

    https://www.theroot.com/covington-ca...e-n-1832756704

    This rag and online video gamers is where the poster that wanted someone to smack the 'entitled punk' get's his knowledge from.
    The title of this thread is arguably libelous too.

    The child has been harmed. I doubt any 16 year old is prepared to deal with the level of hate that was directed at this child.
    And yet, amusingly, there are people who still want to condemn the child rather than accept that it was racist, lying adults who perpetrated this fraud and didn't care that it was directed at a minor.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nichols
    replied
    Originally posted by Cambronnne View Post
    Now, please tell me more about how this 16 year old kid is "playing the victim".
    That's easy......get your 'facts' by reading crap like this:

    Nothing says white privilege like being a self-satisfied ******* wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat and impeding the path of a Native American activist; and then, when called out on said assholishness, suing the billionaire owner of the Washington Post (when every damn paper in America wrote about that story) for $250 million.

    https://www.theroot.com/covington-ca...e-n-1832756704

    This rag and online video gamers is where the poster that wanted someone to smack the 'entitled punk' get's his knowledge from.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cambronnne
    replied
    Originally posted by Duncan View Post
    Kid is now suing for $250,000,000. Whiny ass snowflake playing the victim.
    libel

    1) n. to publish in print (including pictures), writing or broadcast through radio, television or film, an untruth about another which will do harm to that person or his/her reputation, by tending to bring the target into ridicule, hatred, scorn or contempt of others.


    From this thread
    Post #5
    The parents lack class. The children lack class. It's clear Trump supporters hate vietnam vets and the military. This video is proof.

    Later

    Too bad no one smacked that smug look off of that entitled punk.

    Later in this thread, linking to an article that said:
    Covington Catholic High School students surrounded, intimidated and chanted over Native Americans singing about indigenous peoples' strength and spirit, according to interviews with attendees of the inaugural Indigenous Peoples March in Washington, D.C.
    It was getting ugly, and I was thinking: ‘I’ve got to find myself an exit out of this situation and finish my song at the Lincoln Memorial,’ ” Phillips told The Washington Post. “I started going that way, and that guy in the hat stood in my way and we were at an impasse. He just blocked my way and wouldn’t allow me to retreat.”
    https://www.cincinnati.com/story/new...ch/2623820002/

    Sandman reports:
    am being called every name in the book, including a racist, and I will not stand for this mob-like character assassination of my family's name. My parents were not on the trip, and I strive to represent my family in a respectful way in all public settings.

    I have received physical and death threats via social media
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...l-protest.html


    Now, please tell me more about how this 16 year old kid is "playing the victim".

    Leave a comment:


  • Duncan
    replied
    Kid is now suing for $250,000,000. Whiny ass snowflake playing the victim.

    Leave a comment:


  • TactiKill J.
    replied
    Originally posted by G David Bock View Post

    "other cultures and groups of people" are not "races".
    Please document when and where I've said what you allege, or are we seeing more of you sterling comprehension skills?
    David. To put in layams terms for you. You obviously know what group of people I'm referring to and a bigot is no better than a racist, they both share the same mentality of generalized hatred, intolerance and ignorance. Hatred that you proudly flaunt btw. The only difference is your target, so no you have no business accusing anyone of racism when you're one of the most hateful people on this forum.

    Actually given the similarities I would not be surprised if you were both, but I have not alleged that.

    Leave a comment:


  • G David Bock
    replied
    Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post


    You don't have any right to call anyone racist when you constantly argue that other cultures and groups of people are inferior.
    "other cultures and groups of people" are not "races".
    Please document when and where I've said what you allege, or are we seeing more of you sterling comprehension skills?

    Leave a comment:


  • TactiKill J.
    replied
    Originally posted by G David Bock View Post

    You might go back and read your posts on page one here. Nichols is correct, you leapt to conclusions consistent with your racism when later facts showed you were in error and way off base. Very similar to what we saw with Obama.

    You don't have any right to call anyone racist when you constantly argue that other cultures and groups of people are inferior.

    Leave a comment:


  • craven
    replied
    I never remember them being accussed of that.

    on the other hand doing Tomhawks and imitating native American dancing can be seen in the video. I believe.

    Leave a comment:


  • G David Bock
    replied
    Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post

    All of the kids were not white, so it was never about them being white. That's what you made it into. I still don't appreciate the disrespect showed by them. But, what else is there to say after 21 pages. It's fine that we disagree.
    You might go back and read your posts on page one here. Nichols is correct, you leapt to conclusions consistent with your racism when later facts showed you were in error and way off base. Very similar to what we saw with Obama.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nichols
    replied
    Originally posted by Half Pint John View Post

    I know of few that are deeper into Trump Dumb Skit than kichols.

    With such bs as the little Chocoholic boy, poor boy, little guy? Old enough to serve.
    Poor little Johnny's TDS is flairing up. Tell your mommy that you need you blankie.

    Leave a comment:


  • Half Pint John
    replied
    Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post

    no
    I know of few that are deeper into Trump Dumb Skit than kichols.

    With such bs as the little Chocoholic boy, poor boy, little guy? Old enough to serve.

    Leave a comment:


  • TactiKill J.
    replied
    Originally posted by Nichols View Post

    Yes, you failed.

    You attempted to make this into a white catholic school boy racial issue. Facts have proved that it was a black racist issue attacking a bunch of white children....you failed.
    All of the kids were not white, so it was never about them being white. That's what you made it into. I still don't appreciate the disrespect showed by them. But, what else is there to say after 21 pages. It's fine that we disagree.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X