Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

We have a Constitutional Rapist

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cheetah772
    started a topic We have a Constitutional Rapist

    We have a Constitutional Rapist

    In the latest bizarre news, Cortez warns she's eager to run the train on progressive agenda. To "run the train" is a sexual innuendo, which means to gangbang someone (having multiple men penetrating a lady, with or without her consent). Has she ever asked America for consent? Nope. She's a constitutional rapist. She wants to rape our beloved Constitution.

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/oca...turn-of-phrase

    The cringe-worthy pledge appeared in the transcript of an extensive interview Ocasio-Cortez gave the Post, in which she complained of being targeted by conservatives. She noted a fake photo that has circulated, purporting to show her in a bathtub, and said her critics have run out of ammunition.

    “Dude, you’re all out of bullets, you’re all out of bombs, you’re all out of all this stuff,” the 29-year-old self-described socialist said.

    “What have you got left?” she asked. “I’m six days into the term, and you already used all your ammo. So enjoy being exhausted for the next two years while we run train on the progressive agenda.”

    She's got a quite dirty mind for her age.

  • Mountain Man
    replied
    Originally posted by wolfhnd View Post

    You are a hard task master :-)

    Cortez is a feminist and I'm a misogynist what did you expect. Seriously however we need to stop being afraid of the labels they stick on us. They are female bullies if you don't react they move on to some other victim.
    Good to know.

    Leave a comment:


  • wolfhnd
    replied
    Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post

    Different subject? We were discussing how change is dependent upon those who do not toe the societal line. You seem have veered off first into feminism and the objectifying of females, which - BTW - they do to themselves.
    You are a hard task master :-)

    Cortez is a feminist and I'm a misogynist what did you expect. Seriously however we need to stop being afraid of the labels they stick on us. They are female bullies if you don't react they move on to some other victim.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mountain Man
    replied
    Originally posted by wolfhnd View Post

    Change is a bit complicated because there are costs and benefits.

    Since we have been talking about female sexuality lets examine what change has had the most impact on women's quality of life. If you were to say the right to vote I think that would be delusional. I would argue that two things have improved women's quality of life more than anything else, birth control whether that be in the form of contraceptives or abortion, and improvements in sanitation. Both of which were driven more by market forces than humanitarian concerns. Women and men have benefited equally from other improvements such as cheap consumer goods but perhaps appliances had more impact on freeing women from traditional roles. Socialism as supported by Cortez has been a dismal failure historically in this area. Even the welfare state that eliminated absolute poverty has come with considerable costs in terms of family and community.

    Women on average spend 70 cents of ever dollar, are historically the major beneficiary by temperament of things like improved housing, receive on average more in government aid than they pay in taxes, live longer, and have more control over child custody to name a few benefits of biological sex. It is human nature to not appreciate what you have been given and always want more given. The question is if the majority of people have any idea where and how their high standard of living is generated. The question for people like Cortez is why is she in the U.S. if it is a horrible place, why did her ancestors not stay in Puerto Rico. The answer of course is capitalism and the competency hierarchy it is based on. The natural female hierarchy by contrast is not based on competency but mate selection. Female hypergamy is a feature of most all cultures. It can be argued that it is also more focused on distribution than production. These kinds of realities cannot be explained by culture because they are manifested cross culturally in recognizable patterns.

    The reality is that rights without responsibilities are not fulfilling. In our efforts to provide a universal franchise no instruction on how or why liberal democracy is to be maintained has been given. We have seen that equality without a competency hierarchy leads to gulags and economic failure over and over but large segments of the population seem blissfully unaware of that history. If your hierarchy is not based on productivity you produce people like Cortez and put them in positions where they are incompetent. Too much of our society is based on pretty faces, beautiful homes in which to hide while the infrastructure around us collapses. We are too focused on form rather than function. All the human rights on paper will not help you when the practical is ignored. The popularity of zombie movies tells me that somewhere deep in the subconscious this reality is understood.
    Different subject? We were discussing how change is dependent upon those who do not toe the societal line. You seem have veered off first into feminism and the objectifying of females, which - BTW - they do to themselves.

    Leave a comment:


  • G David Bock
    replied
    Originally posted by craven View Post

    So your saying politically correctness is a good thing. Wow please turn in your conservate card now and start voting for the left.

    btw anyone who grew up in the late 80s would tell you I am correct. Since the song was fairly popular then.
    Nope. But the article and excerpts I present might be seen as such. My "comment" amounts to the two smilies I inserted.

    Just suggesting that opinions seem to vary on the connotations here.

    Since I've often been accused of a slanted perspective/bias on many of these topics, just trying, once again, to provided some material that could cover the "other side" of the debate.


    BTW, which song ???

    Leave a comment:


  • wolfhnd
    replied
    Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post

    And yet progress in any civilization is usually by those who do "muck around" and exceed the known parameters. Go figure.
    Change is a bit complicated because there are costs and benefits.

    Since we have been talking about female sexuality lets examine what change has had the most impact on women's quality of life. If you were to say the right to vote I think that would be delusional. I would argue that two things have improved women's quality of life more than anything else, birth control whether that be in the form of contraceptives or abortion, and improvements in sanitation. Both of which were driven more by market forces than humanitarian concerns. Women and men have benefited equally from other improvements such as cheap consumer goods but perhaps appliances had more impact on freeing women from traditional roles. Socialism as supported by Cortez has been a dismal failure historically in this area. Even the welfare state that eliminated absolute poverty has come with considerable costs in terms of family and community.

    Women on average spend 70 cents of ever dollar, are historically the major beneficiary by temperament of things like improved housing, receive on average more in government aid than they pay in taxes, live longer, and have more control over child custody to name a few benefits of biological sex. It is human nature to not appreciate what you have been given and always want more given. The question is if the majority of people have any idea where and how their high standard of living is generated. The question for people like Cortez is why is she in the U.S. if it is a horrible place, why did her ancestors not stay in Puerto Rico. The answer of course is capitalism and the competency hierarchy it is based on. The natural female hierarchy by contrast is not based on competency but mate selection. Female hypergamy is a feature of most all cultures. It can be argued that it is also more focused on distribution than production. These kinds of realities cannot be explained by culture because they are manifested cross culturally in recognizable patterns.

    The reality is that rights without responsibilities are not fulfilling. In our efforts to provide a universal franchise no instruction on how or why liberal democracy is to be maintained has been given. We have seen that equality without a competency hierarchy leads to gulags and economic failure over and over but large segments of the population seem blissfully unaware of that history. If your hierarchy is not based on productivity you produce people like Cortez and put them in positions where they are incompetent. Too much of our society is based on pretty faces, beautiful homes in which to hide while the infrastructure around us collapses. We are too focused on form rather than function. All the human rights on paper will not help you when the practical is ignored. The popularity of zombie movies tells me that somewhere deep in the subconscious this reality is understood.

    Leave a comment:


  • craven
    replied
    Originally posted by G David Bock View Post
    Ocasio-Cortez Uses Violent Sexual Term To Describe Her Far-Left Agenda

    ...
    Former law enforcement officials called out socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) for using a violent sexual term on Wednesday in an interview that was published in The Washington Post.

    Ocasio-Cortez complained in the interview that the media was "focusing on taking quotes out of context or manipulating them or making it seem as though I said things that I didn’t say."

    A few sentences later, she said, "So enjoy being exhausted for the next two years while we run train on the progressive agenda."

    The 29-year-old former bartender, who describes herself as "Alex from the Bronx," used the term in the following exchange:
    The Post: How did you feel when that hit yesterday?

    Ocasio-Cortez: I was surprised and I was annoyed because it was a new tack. They’ve been for a very long time focusing on taking quotes out of context or manipulating them or making it seem as though I said things that I didn’t say. This was different in that it was an outright fraudulent thing. You can tell that they’re getting into hysterics because now you’re getting into my actual body, which is definitely crossing a level, definitely crossing a line.

    I also think it’s encouraging because this is my sixth day in Congress and they’re out of all their artillery. The nude is supposed to be like the bazooka. You know, like, “We’re going to take her down.” Dude, you’re all out of bullets, you’re all out of bombs, you’re all out of all this stuff. What have you got left? I’m six days into the term, and you already used all your ammo. So enjoy being exhausted for the next two years while we run train on the progressive agenda.
    The Washington Free Beacon noted that while Ocasio-Cortez most likely meant "she and her fellow liberal Democrats would enthusiastically pursue their agenda items, 'run train' is known as a crude sexual term, which is sometimes used to denote acting in an aggressive manner."

    Multiple online dictionaries that provide definitions for slang terms state that "run train" means to "to gangbang" someone with "several" other people.
    Former law enforcement officials weighed in on Ocasio-Cortez's statement and verified that "run train" does, in fact, refer to violent sexual activity.

    ".@AOC is trivializing a term (‘Run-Train’) used by murderous gangs like MS-13 to describe their tactic of brutally gang-raping women," former NYPD officer John Cardillo tweeted.

    CNN law enforcement analyst James A. Gagliano also weighed in on Ocasio-Cortez's remark, tweeting: "As someone who speaks live on-air, w/o “net” — understand misspeaking. Happens to best of us. But know no other context for this vile phrase. As someone who investigated violent street crime for years, this is vernacular of felons I’ve interrogated; not a sitting Congresswoman."

    ....
    https://www.dailywire.com/news/42286...aign=position2

    So your saying politically correctness is a good thing. Wow please turn in your conservate card now and start voting for the left.

    btw anyone who grew up in the late 80s would tell you I am correct. Since the song was fairly popular then.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mountain Man
    replied
    Originally posted by wolfhnd View Post

    Women tired of being beaten by drunken brutes and having the milk money spent on booze gave us the dystopian world of prohibition. Unintended consequences is one of the hallmarks of moral panics.

    People are driven by their instincts. As it relates to this thread the term biological clock was a popular reference a few years ago to women who postponed families in favor of careers.

    A Middle-Aged Career Woman on the Lies of Feminism She Learned Too Late

    https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/11/...rned-too-late/

    ​​​​​​Dennis Prager is a bit to religious for my tastes but as the woman in the article points out by wishing to remain anonymous it would be hard to quantify how common the regrets may be. I'm also not naive enough to think almost everyone doesn't have regrets. The point would be about how instincts color those regrets.

    A large part of the meaning in our lives is derived from satisfying instincts such as "love" and family. The key to understanding the biological is that DNA is the blueprint for creating the environment in which developmental patterns are expressed. Different environments will produce different expressions but a great deal of fidelity to the original type is required. Mutations for the most part are deleterious. Since we are a product of culture and biology the same principle applies to cultural mutations as well, if to a lesser extent.

    The moral is don't muck around with things you don't understand especially if you are a young person with limited experience.
    And yet progress in any civilization is usually by those who do "muck around" and exceed the known parameters. Go figure.

    Leave a comment:


  • wolfhnd
    replied
    Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
    Sounds like psycho-babble. We have tons of experience with successful females in a wide variety of roles and responsibilities, Thatcher for one, and we are no longer apes, unless you count the denizens of WalMart.
    Women tired of being beaten by drunken brutes and having the milk money spent on booze gave us the dystopian world of prohibition. Unintended consequences is one of the hallmarks of moral panics.

    People are driven by their instincts. As it relates to this thread the term biological clock was a popular reference a few years ago to women who postponed families in favor of careers.

    A Middle-Aged Career Woman on the Lies of Feminism She Learned Too Late

    https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/11/...rned-too-late/

    ​​​​​​Dennis Prager is a bit to religious for my tastes but as the woman in the article points out by wishing to remain anonymous it would be hard to quantify how common the regrets may be. I'm also not naive enough to think almost everyone doesn't have regrets. The point would be about how instincts color those regrets.

    A large part of the meaning in our lives is derived from satisfying instincts such as "love" and family. The key to understanding the biological is that DNA is the blueprint for creating the environment in which developmental patterns are expressed. Different environments will produce different expressions but a great deal of fidelity to the original type is required. Mutations for the most part are deleterious. Since we are a product of culture and biology the same principle applies to cultural mutations as well, if to a lesser extent.

    The moral is don't muck around with things you don't understand especially if you are a young person with limited experience.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mountain Man
    replied
    Sounds like psycho-babble. We have tons of experience with successful females in a wide variety of roles and responsibilities, Thatcher for one, and we are no longer apes, unless you count the denizens of WalMart.

    Leave a comment:


  • wolfhnd
    replied
    Originally posted by marktwain View Post

    You may mean " Marquis de Sade." Currently, the Franco American Food Dragon is the marquis de Sauce, "Whe3re Sauce3 is king".

    a ding ding!

    I thought about correcting that little error that the spell checker through in as I was typing and decided I would just see if anyone actually reads my nonsense :-).

    The role that sex plays in history is probably grossly under estimated. The important thing would be to not seperate it from other instincts.

    The theory would be that instincts operate below the conscious level. We experience instincts after the fact as what we call feelings or physiological changes that only become conscious above a certain threshold or under special conditions. We can expect a lot of freudian slips from people like Cortez because the religion of social justice has taught them a tabula rasa view of human nature. Something she would hate to hear is that we don't know what the negative impact of female apes will have on the political landscape because it is so new. What we can be sure of is that there will be negative consequences because that's life. The assumption that the impacts will all be positive speaks to a fundamental naivety found in all people susceptible to cults.

    Leave a comment:


  • T. A. Gardner
    replied
    Originally posted by Pruitt View Post
    Perhaps Miss Ocasio Cortez does not expect to ever have to pay those kind of taxes?

    Pruitt
    Ocasio Cortez intends to spend her life being a "taker" not a "maker." That should be obvious to anyone.

    Leave a comment:


  • marktwain
    replied
    Originally posted by wolfhnd View Post
    In another thread I pointed out the connection between modern leftist dogma and the writings of the Marquis de Sauce. Then there is brutalized architecture etc. This people are as soulless as what they accuse capitalists of being.
    You may mean " Marquis de Sade." Currently, the Franco American Food Dragon is the marquis de Sauce, "Whe3re Sauce3 is king".

    a ding ding!

    Leave a comment:


  • Pruitt
    replied
    Originally posted by Stonewall_Jack View Post

    Cortez claims to be Catholic and claims Jewish ancestry. That is a double whammy because Cortez goes against Catholic and Jewish values. Any Catholic and any Jew ought stand by good values, and good values does not include supporting a 70% income tax for fellow Americans which Cortez supports.
    I ran my daughter's DNA a couple of years back. I did mine and I wanted to see what the test would reveal about My ex-wife's family. I married into a Cajun Family. My Mother-in-Law was a Marcantel which translates to a German settler that married into Cajun families. My Father-in-Law was a Blanchard which denotes French descent. I expected to see some German, Native American (possible Great Grandmother) and some French. Instead we found French, Spanish, Islenos, Ashkenazi and Sephardic markers! Lots of Spanish Jewish Converts found it expedient to travel as colonists to the New World. Torquemada helped them decide! Puerto Rico probably has their fair share of Jewish descendants. They just got there a little earlier. My in laws were raised well in small farming communities. In spite of their raising they did a lot of illegal things before they passed on. Having been raised by good values does not guarantee a righteous life.

    Perhaps Miss Ocasio Cortez does not expect to ever have to pay those kind of taxes?

    Pruitt

    Leave a comment:


  • Arnold J Rimmer
    replied
    Originally posted by johns624 View Post
    This story is a perfect example of the stupidity in today's world. AOC says enough stupid stuff that made up stories implying she said something sexual aren't even needed. Just like when Obama was president, instead of focusing on his policies, it was that he was a non-citizen, racist, Muslim from Kenya (or Indonesia). When Bush 2 was president, it was the same thing. People talked about the way he talked instead of focusing on how Cheney was manipulating him. It's like we're in junior high again making fun of people instead of discussing the issues.
    Well, Bobo was in fact a racist, disloyal, and incompetent. And we blocked most of his policies.

    People can talk about what they want in the USA. At least for now.

    Leave a comment:

Latest Topics

Collapse

Working...
X