Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CNN 1; White House 0

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Massena
    replied
    The White House backs off:

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/19/media...ing/index.html

    Leave a comment:


  • Massena
    replied
    And the White House continues to be petty...

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...cid=spartandhp

    Leave a comment:


  • Krasny Strela
    replied
    Originally posted by ljadw View Post

    The fact that only 2 Democrats voted against his nomination,indicates that Kelly is a Rino .

    Just proof that when Republicans appoint judges they actually judge according to the constitution. This point is continually brought up by the left as proof only because they fully expect that any judges appointed by the themselves will attempt to rule based on ideology first and foremost.

    Leave a comment:


  • Andy H
    replied
    Originally posted by Half Pint John View Post
    FOX is fully behind CNN in this case
    Hi HPJ

    Yes I read that in the case details.

    TBH I think they had to no matter what journalistic/political differences they may have with CNN and others.
    Firstly I think they did it out of journalistic solidarity and secondly out of pragmatism, as they know eventually
    the WH may have an incumbent whose the political opposite to Trump. There is a third option that they actually
    thought the WH was wrong! Maybe somebody should ask them why they supported the action. I wonder how
    the President viewed there support given his relationship with them?

    Regards

    Andy H

    Leave a comment:


  • T. A. Gardner
    replied
    Originally posted by Massena View Post

    The arrogant, ignorant fool is Trump who cannot stand being asked questions he doesn't want to answer. Acosta, and the rest of the press are doing their jobs-Trump ought to try doing his.
    This started when Acosta said "I'm going to challenge you..." That isn't a question, Acosta was looking for an argument and a verbal fight. He acted no different than that CNN twit Candi Crowley. Acosta had already gotten to ask his two questions, and gotten answers-- which apparently he didn't like. Well, to F***ing bad for him.

    It is Acosta who "ought to try doing his" job right.

    Leave a comment:


  • Massena
    replied
    Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    Well, the first return salvo is already in the works. The White House is putting out rules in writing for how journalists have to behave at press conferences. This unnecessary step is the result of one arrogant, combative fool in the press not wanting to play by the unwritten rules. Thanks CNN for more unnecessary lawyering and rules...

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/16/b...sta-trump.html
    The arrogant, ignorant fool is Trump who cannot stand being asked questions he doesn't want to answer. Acosta, and the rest of the press are doing their jobs-Trump ought to try doing his.

    Leave a comment:


  • ljadw
    replied
    Originally posted by Massena View Post
    And the judge was a Trump appointee...
    The fact that only 2 Democrats voted against his nomination,indicates that Kelly is a Rino .

    Leave a comment:


  • wolfhnd
    replied
    Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    Well, the first return salvo is already in the works. The White House is putting out rules in writing for how journalists have to behave at press conferences. This unnecessary step is the result of one arrogant, combative fool in the press not wanting to play by the unwritten rules. Thanks CNN for more unnecessary lawyering and rules...

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/16/b...sta-trump.html
    If they continue to advocate for incivility does that mean we can exclude democrats from contact with most of the population?

    Leave a comment:


  • T. A. Gardner
    replied
    Well, the first return salvo is already in the works. The White House is putting out rules in writing for how journalists have to behave at press conferences. This unnecessary step is the result of one arrogant, combative fool in the press not wanting to play by the unwritten rules. Thanks CNN for more unnecessary lawyering and rules...

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/16/b...sta-trump.html

    Leave a comment:


  • Massena
    replied
    And the judge was a Trump appointee...

    Leave a comment:


  • SRV Ron
    replied
    Originally posted by Half Pint John View Post
    FOX is fully behind CNN in this case
    It has to do with his being denied due process, not his First Amendment Rights. That is what the judge ruled on. The video speaks volumes on his behavior after Trump had answered his question.

    Leave a comment:


  • Massena
    replied
    Originally posted by The Exorcist View Post

    A Democrat cares about what is and is not legal?

    Great!
    They could use your help, down there by the Mexican border.
    Once again, genius, I'm not a Democrat. Your continued insistence on labels, especially political ones, is pathetic as well as counter-productive.

    Leave a comment:


  • ljadw
    replied
    Originally posted by inevtiab1e View Post
    Thankfully we have a secular Constitution protecting the press from fascists.
    image_79661.jpg
    1 Without nationalism, a country is doomed. Those who attack nationalism are traitors.
    2 The rights of American citizens are not disdained
    3 Identification of enemies is needed
    4 There is no supremacy of military in the USA
    5 Sexism has always existed and will always exist, whatever the nature of government
    6 The fact that Deep State controlls the media is not a prove that US is fascist
    7 National Security is essential for the survival of the nation : this is proved by 9/11
    8 That religion and government are intertwined is not a proof of fascism : Britain is not fascist
    9 Without the corporations the economy will collaps
    10 Labour is not persecuted in the US
    11 Intellectuals are parasites
    12 The obsession with crime and punishment can never be too great : it is them or us
    13 Cronyism and corruption are inherent on government : JFK appointed Bob as AG and Ted as senator .
    14 Fraudulent elections are inherent on elections and if they are a sign of fascism, which they are not, they prove that the Denocrats are fascists .

    Leave a comment:


  • ljadw
    replied
    Originally posted by inevtiab1e View Post
    Thankfully we have a secular Constitution protecting the press from fascists.
    image_79661.jpg
    Nonsense : the Constitution does not protect the people : if Hillary was potus and Scotus was liberal , the First and Second Amemendments would be annulled de facto: only the 400 million fire weapons are protecting the people against the government .

    Leave a comment:


  • T. A. Gardner
    replied
    Originally posted by inevtiab1e View Post
    Thankfully we have a secular Constitution protecting the press from fascists.
    image_79661.jpg
    Well, let's see...

    1. I'll give them this one. Nationalism is part of fascism.
    2. I'd say any dictatorship does that. Communists are far more likely to do it than fascists. So, this one is a WRONG!
    3. This is goes for any dictatorship, Communist, Junta, military strongman, you-name-it.
    4. Same as three. This is hardly unique to fascism.
    5. I'd say theocracies are more likely to do that, like Islamic countries. This is not something unique to fascism.
    6. Same as three. This is normal in any dictatorship or heavy handed government system. You could apply this to most of the EU right now to one degree or another.
    7. I'd say you'd have a hard time proving that. On the other hand, militarism is common to most dictatorships So, this one is WRONG!
    8. This is laughable. Fascism does not require in the least a religious component. But, theocracies do, like the whole of Dar al Islam.
    9. Again this is just stupid. Fascism, like Communism, puts the state in charge of the economy. If the state continues to allow private ownership of the means of production, it strips owners of much of the decision making about what is produced. This can be Socialist, or Statist Capitalist. So this one is WRONG!
    10. Labor isn't suppressed. It, like under Communism, becomes controlled by the state. Unions are either abolished or they are run by the government and participation is made mandatory.
    11. This is true of almost all dictatorships, Right, Left, or whatever. So this is WRONG!
    12. Crime and punishment can be heavy handed in any society. Look at much of Europe right now. This is not unique to fascism.
    13. This is more a case of societal norms, and the establishment of a large impersonal government, be it Socialist, Communist, a military junta, or whatever. It isn't a valid indicator of fascism.
    14. Fraudulent elections are a staple of Leftist dictatorships running on Socialism or Communism. They are not unique to fascism.

    This list is crap, and whoever made it is an idiot. If anything, this list is closer to one that is warning signs of a Leftist takeover of government.

    Leave a comment:

Latest Topics

Collapse

Working...
X