Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CNN 1; White House 0

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by inevtiab1e View Post
    Thankfully we have a secular Constitution protecting the press from fascists.
    image_79661.jpg
    1 Without nationalism, a country is doomed. Those who attack nationalism are traitors.
    2 The rights of American citizens are not disdained
    3 Identification of enemies is needed
    4 There is no supremacy of military in the USA
    5 Sexism has always existed and will always exist, whatever the nature of government
    6 The fact that Deep State controlls the media is not a prove that US is fascist
    7 National Security is essential for the survival of the nation : this is proved by 9/11
    8 That religion and government are intertwined is not a proof of fascism : Britain is not fascist
    9 Without the corporations the economy will collaps
    10 Labour is not persecuted in the US
    11 Intellectuals are parasites
    12 The obsession with crime and punishment can never be too great : it is them or us
    13 Cronyism and corruption are inherent on government : JFK appointed Bob as AG and Ted as senator .
    14 Fraudulent elections are inherent on elections and if they are a sign of fascism, which they are not, they prove that the Denocrats are fascists .

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by The Exorcist View Post

      A Democrat cares about what is and is not legal?

      Great!
      They could use your help, down there by the Mexican border.
      Once again, genius, I'm not a Democrat. Your continued insistence on labels, especially political ones, is pathetic as well as counter-productive.
      We are not now that strength which in old days
      Moved earth and heaven; that which we are we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts
      Made weak by time and fate but strong in will
      To strive to seek to find and not to yield.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Half Pint John View Post
        FOX is fully behind CNN in this case
        It has to do with his being denied due process, not his First Amendment Rights. That is what the judge ruled on. The video speaks volumes on his behavior after Trump had answered his question.
        “Breaking News,”

        “Something irrelevant in your life just happened and now we are going to blow it all out of proportion for days to keep you distracted from what's really going on.”

        Comment


        • #34
          And the judge was a Trump appointee...
          We are not now that strength which in old days
          Moved earth and heaven; that which we are we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts
          Made weak by time and fate but strong in will
          To strive to seek to find and not to yield.

          Comment


          • #35
            Well, the first return salvo is already in the works. The White House is putting out rules in writing for how journalists have to behave at press conferences. This unnecessary step is the result of one arrogant, combative fool in the press not wanting to play by the unwritten rules. Thanks CNN for more unnecessary lawyering and rules...

            https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/16/b...sta-trump.html

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
              Well, the first return salvo is already in the works. The White House is putting out rules in writing for how journalists have to behave at press conferences. This unnecessary step is the result of one arrogant, combative fool in the press not wanting to play by the unwritten rules. Thanks CNN for more unnecessary lawyering and rules...

              https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/16/b...sta-trump.html
              If they continue to advocate for incivility does that mean we can exclude democrats from contact with most of the population?
              We hunt the hunters

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Massena View Post
                And the judge was a Trump appointee...
                The fact that only 2 Democrats voted against his nomination,indicates that Kelly is a Rino .

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
                  Well, the first return salvo is already in the works. The White House is putting out rules in writing for how journalists have to behave at press conferences. This unnecessary step is the result of one arrogant, combative fool in the press not wanting to play by the unwritten rules. Thanks CNN for more unnecessary lawyering and rules...

                  https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/16/b...sta-trump.html
                  The arrogant, ignorant fool is Trump who cannot stand being asked questions he doesn't want to answer. Acosta, and the rest of the press are doing their jobs-Trump ought to try doing his.
                  We are not now that strength which in old days
                  Moved earth and heaven; that which we are we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts
                  Made weak by time and fate but strong in will
                  To strive to seek to find and not to yield.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Massena View Post

                    The arrogant, ignorant fool is Trump who cannot stand being asked questions he doesn't want to answer. Acosta, and the rest of the press are doing their jobs-Trump ought to try doing his.
                    This started when Acosta said "I'm going to challenge you..." That isn't a question, Acosta was looking for an argument and a verbal fight. He acted no different than that CNN twit Candi Crowley. Acosta had already gotten to ask his two questions, and gotten answers-- which apparently he didn't like. Well, to F***ing bad for him.

                    It is Acosta who "ought to try doing his" job right.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Half Pint John View Post
                      FOX is fully behind CNN in this case
                      Hi HPJ

                      Yes I read that in the case details.

                      TBH I think they had to no matter what journalistic/political differences they may have with CNN and others.
                      Firstly I think they did it out of journalistic solidarity and secondly out of pragmatism, as they know eventually
                      the WH may have an incumbent whose the political opposite to Trump. There is a third option that they actually
                      thought the WH was wrong! Maybe somebody should ask them why they supported the action. I wonder how
                      the President viewed there support given his relationship with them?

                      Regards

                      Andy H
                      "You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life." Churchill

                      "I'm no reactionary.Christ on the Mountain! I'm as idealistic as Hell" Eisenhower

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by ljadw View Post

                        The fact that only 2 Democrats voted against his nomination,indicates that Kelly is a Rino .

                        Just proof that when Republicans appoint judges they actually judge according to the constitution. This point is continually brought up by the left as proof only because they fully expect that any judges appointed by the themselves will attempt to rule based on ideology first and foremost.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          And the White House continues to be petty...

                          https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...cid=spartandhp
                          We are not now that strength which in old days
                          Moved earth and heaven; that which we are we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts
                          Made weak by time and fate but strong in will
                          To strive to seek to find and not to yield.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            The White House backs off:

                            https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/19/media...ing/index.html
                            We are not now that strength which in old days
                            Moved earth and heaven; that which we are we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts
                            Made weak by time and fate but strong in will
                            To strive to seek to find and not to yield.

                            Comment

                            Latest Topics

                            Collapse

                            Working...
                            X