Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trump Has Taken the Side of Right Wing Terrorists

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GRA
    replied
    Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post

    "You people" is anyone who disagrees the TDS'ers on this forum. It's how they identify and vilify anyone who doesn't think as they do.
    Sounds like sone kind of bullshlt racist Eric Holder would say.

    Leave a comment:


  • 101combatvet
    replied
    Originally posted by Half Pint John View Post

    We have more than one Cracker here that well try to lie their way around this. White supremacists' favorite myths about black crime rates take another hit from BJS study

    October 23, 2017

    David Neiwert

    White supremacists frequently like to manipulate crime statistics in order to claim that nonwhite minorities, particularly African-Americans, are far more crime-prone and the source of most violent crime against whites. Indeed, it is a core belief that this is the case, and many white nationalist ideologues — including politician and pundit Patrick Buchanan, Jared Taylor of American Renaissance, and the Council of Conservative Citizens — all have made considerable hay out of proffering “studies” laden with risibly bad statistics and other evidence to make their case.

    The BJS study demonstrates plainly that this is simply not the case. Some 57 percent of crimes involving white victims were committed by white perpetrators, while only 15 percent were committed by blacks, and 11 percent by Hispanics. Black crime victims fell along similar racial lines, with 63 percent of the crimes committed by black perpetrators, while 11 percent were committed by whites, and 6.6 percent by Hispanics.


    Moreover, it explained, “the rate of white-on-white violent crime (12.0 per 1,000) was about four times higher than black-on-white violent crime (3.1 per 1,000). The rate of black-on-black crime (16.5 per 1,000) was more than five times higher than white-on-black violent crime (2.8 per 1,000). The rate of Hispanic-on-Hispanic crime (8.3 per 1,000) was about double the rate of white-on-Hispanic (4.1 per 1,000) and black-on-Hispanic (4.2 per 1,000) violent crime.”

    This is consistent with previously collected data, including a National Crime Victim Survey in 2000 that showed that 73 percent of white violent crime victims were attacked by whites, and 80 percent of black victims were targeted by blacks. This pattern is even clearer in the category of murder.
    Doesn't even understand the **** that he posts. Where is the lie? Do the math!

    Leave a comment:


  • ljadw
    replied
    David Neiwert is a liberal working for the SPLC ( a hate group funded by Soros ) ,thus there is no reason to believe one word of this Soros henchman .

    Leave a comment:


  • Half Pint John
    replied
    Originally posted by Dibble201Bty View Post

    I see these killing as contextual in th nth' degree. I bet there are many, many gangland killers with a murder list far, far longer and vindictive than those that throw a nutjob tantrum and slaughter people in a one-off frenzy.
    We have more than one Cracker here that well try to lie their way around this. White supremacists' favorite myths about black crime rates take another hit from BJS study

    October 23, 2017

    David Neiwert

    White supremacists frequently like to manipulate crime statistics in order to claim that nonwhite minorities, particularly African-Americans, are far more crime-prone and the source of most violent crime against whites. Indeed, it is a core belief that this is the case, and many white nationalist ideologues — including politician and pundit Patrick Buchanan, Jared Taylor of American Renaissance, and the Council of Conservative Citizens — all have made considerable hay out of proffering “studies” laden with risibly bad statistics and other evidence to make their case.

    The BJS study demonstrates plainly that this is simply not the case. Some 57 percent of crimes involving white victims were committed by white perpetrators, while only 15 percent were committed by blacks, and 11 percent by Hispanics. Black crime victims fell along similar racial lines, with 63 percent of the crimes committed by black perpetrators, while 11 percent were committed by whites, and 6.6 percent by Hispanics.


    Moreover, it explained, “the rate of white-on-white violent crime (12.0 per 1,000) was about four times higher than black-on-white violent crime (3.1 per 1,000). The rate of black-on-black crime (16.5 per 1,000) was more than five times higher than white-on-black violent crime (2.8 per 1,000). The rate of Hispanic-on-Hispanic crime (8.3 per 1,000) was about double the rate of white-on-Hispanic (4.1 per 1,000) and black-on-Hispanic (4.2 per 1,000) violent crime.”

    This is consistent with previously collected data, including a National Crime Victim Survey in 2000 that showed that 73 percent of white violent crime victims were attacked by whites, and 80 percent of black victims were targeted by blacks. This pattern is even clearer in the category of murder.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dibble201Bty
    replied
    Originally posted by 101combatvet View Post

    Number one cause of death by murder for whites of a different race is by blacks. Those numbers make white terrorism look like a joke.
    I see these killing as contextual in th nth' degree. I bet there are many, many gangland killers with a murder list far, far longer and vindictive than those that throw a nutjob tantrum and slaughter people in a one-off frenzy.

    Leave a comment:


  • 101combatvet
    replied
    Originally posted by Dibble201Bty View Post

    Funny that! In the UK which has very stringent firearms laws, it's the black community that are doing most of the shooting/stabbing murders of other mainly blacks. What's the black-on-black, and gangland murder rate in the US these days?
    Number one cause of death by murder for whites of a different race is by blacks. Those numbers make white terrorism look like a joke.

    Leave a comment:


  • American87
    replied
    Originally posted by Half Pint John View Post
    He said the Nazis or whatever they are are terrible people. He also said Antifa was terrible people. As a far left liberal, I think his comments were a call for peace on both sides, and I like that. His prospects are looking good for 2020

    Leave a comment:


  • Half Pint John
    replied
    Those rates I'm not sure of but black on black are pretty high afaik with so many gang style killing and Hood shot ups.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dibble201Bty
    replied
    Originally posted by Half Pint John View Post

    Why not? All the mass killings have been carried out by whites and many Right Wing supporters. That includes the most recent shooting in CA.
    Funny that! In the UK which has very stringent firearms laws, it's the black community that are doing most of the shooting/stabbing murders of other mainly blacks. What's the black-on-black, and gangland murder rate in the US these days?

    Leave a comment:


  • Half Pint John
    replied
    Re-define every act of violence by anyone with white skin as "Right Wing Terror"
    Why not? All the mass killings have been carried out by whites and many Right Wing supporters. That includes the most recent shooting in CA.

    Leave a comment:


  • Half Pint John
    replied
    Originally posted by Nikki View Post
    Had this occurred a couple of years ago, I would've been on that bandwagon bashing Trump as a racist and all that. No, Trump is not a supporter of white supremacy nutters, though Rep. Steve King might be. He is the one and the only one who should be vilified.

    That said, I find Antifa freaks more terrifying than white supremacy nutters. Just my 2 cents on this.
    What did Trump say about this march?

    gettyimages-830617844_master1.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&w=940.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • Half Pint John
    replied
    Originally posted by Krasny Strela View Post
    In other news the bloke who wrote anti-semitic tracts all over a synagogue turns out to be a black community organizer who got his first job stumping for obama. Guess Trump is to blame for that as well....
    Obamas election came before Trumps. Blacks or whites can both be anti Semitic just as you can be racist, not saying that you are...but

    Leave a comment:


  • Krasny Strela
    replied
    In other news the bloke who wrote anti-semitic tracts all over a synagogue turns out to be a black community organizer who got his first job stumping for obama. Guess Trump is to blame for that as well....

    Leave a comment:


  • pamak
    replied
    Something still doesn’t pass the smell test. In a moment of time where merely wearing a “MAGA” hat can get you fired, beat up, or merely harangued out of your favorite eatery, we are asked to believe that Cesar Altieri Sayoc was allowed to drive around safely in a van abundantly and meticulously adorned with pro-Trump stickers. The van was never overturned or torched wherever he parked or drove it. No tires were ever slashed, no windows were ever smashed in with a baseball bat. It was never even keyed. And there it was in pristine condition, undamaged and ready for its close-up before a media avid to blame President Trump for Sayoc's actions
    https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...mell_test.html

    The reason people are confused and see this case as one which "does not pass the smell test" is because their original premises do not pass the smell test. The idea that someone with a car full of TRump's stickers will see his car vandalized by the "leftists" is what does not pass "the smell test" Watching FOX News or right-wing media showing every angry leftist they can find in a nation of 350,000,000 who attacks or vandalizes the property of a Trump supporter does not change the fact that such cases are the exception of the norm. Also, even if we assume that at some point someone vandalized such stickers, the owner could still replace them with new ones...

    Leave a comment:


  • pamak
    replied
    Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    It is interesting that Sayoc is probably the singularly worst bomber in US history too. Of the 15 (about that) bombs he sent, not one detonated. Not even a partial, low-grade, detonation. While it is a relief that he was this incompetent, it does bring up the question of How could he be that incompetent?

    Did he never try out one of these devices to make sure it worked? The Unibomber was meticulous in his designs. From the anarchists that blew up Wall Street in the 20's to the Boston bombers, these guys made devices that would work. Yet, here we have Sayoc making a dozen plus bombs to a pattern that apparently doesn't even work.

    If it was his intention to send bombs to Democrats knowing full well they wouldn't go off, and he'd be caught, then he succeeded. If on the other hand, if his intention was to kill or maim Democrats using bombs, then he is the singularly most incompetent bomber in US history


    So, the FBI is lying again...Got it!

    Have you thought that bombs of the same design and mailed at about the same time may very well show the same level of effectiveness? Yes, if the design is defective, the most probable outcome is that all bombs will be ineffective. And there have been countless cases of bombs that have failed to explode. Sometime people think that what works in their "lab" will work in the real world which is not the case for all designs. Anything from moisture to vibration can ruin the plans of certain designs when they are tested under real conditions. Designing a bomb that you want it to explode after it has been delivered through mail is much more challenging than setting a bomb that you want to explode after a certain time. The sensitivity of a bomb which will be handled and carried by mailmen should have lower sensitivity and must have a design that does not let accidental detonation. These requirements highly increase the chances of a defective design.

    Leave a comment:

Latest Topics

Collapse

Working...
X