Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

About that "Deep State" ....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Half Pint John
    replied
    DEEP STATE

    latest?cb=20140815174149.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • Mountain Man
    replied
    Originally posted by Hida Akechi View Post

    I know. But everything has to have a beginning. As long as this campaign of house-cleaning continues, and escalates, it's all a good thing.


    Until the Democrats take over again and reverse it all. Change must come from the top down to meaningful. The DS has lots of galley slaves to sacrifice in order to maintain themselves.

    IIRC, Louis Lerner never was punished for her blatant abuse of the IRS system. This is merely the political equivalent of re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hida Akechi
    replied
    Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post

    But barely the tip of a huge iceberg of unknown proportions. The Deep State is also the Corrupt State.
    I know. But everything has to have a beginning. As long as this campaign of house-cleaning continues, and escalates, it's all a good thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mountain Man
    replied
    Originally posted by Hida Akechi View Post

    Good start.
    But barely the tip of a huge iceberg of unknown proportions. The Deep State is also the Corrupt State.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hida Akechi
    replied
    Originally posted by G David Bock View Post
    “I Don’t Give A Sh*t If That Is A Crime”- O’Keefe Strikes Again=> Undercover Video Exposes IRS Officials Targeting Conservative Groups

    ...
    (Gateway Pundit) – O’Keefe strikes again! On Tuesday, Project Veritas rolled out its 4th undercover video of its “Deep State Unmasked” series.

    The latest undercover video exposes two IRS officials bragging about targeting conservative groups and saying, “I don’t give a **** that is a crime.”

    The two officials in the report are Thomas Sheehy, an IRS tax examiner and member of the Austin Democratic Socialists of America in Texas, and Jerry Semasek, an IRS attorney in Washington, DC.
    ...
    “As our deep state investigation continues to unfold, four government agencies have responded resulting in the removal of two federal employees from their job duties. Stay tuned to see which Government Agency we unmask next,“ O’Keefe said in a statement.

    Project Veritas already got two Deep State scalps!

    Department of Justice paralegal, Allison Hrabar is OUT at the DOJ after undercover video revealed she reportedly uses government-owned software and computers to push a Socialist agenda and punish people she disagrees with.

    Last week, just a few hours after O’Keefe rolled out the video of Commie Natarajan Subramanian bragging about slowing down Trump’s agenda, he was removed from ongoing GAO work and cut off from access to GAO equipment.
    ...
    https://www.teaparty.org/dont-give-s...groups-325718/
    Good start.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hida Akechi
    replied
    Originally posted by Trung Si View Post
    The Deep State does exist, it has always existed in all administrations, it's entrenched Bureaucrats undermining the elected Administration that they do not approve of, DemocRat or Republican, the latest blatant examples are Lois Lerner, Starzok and his girlfriend, they will always exist and there is not a damn thing we can do about it except for Bitch, Cry and Complain.
    Or line them up against a wall when the next revolution comes....

    Leave a comment:


  • G David Bock
    replied
    “I Don’t Give A Sh*t If That Is A Crime”- O’Keefe Strikes Again=> Undercover Video Exposes IRS Officials Targeting Conservative Groups

    ...
    (Gateway Pundit) – O’Keefe strikes again! On Tuesday, Project Veritas rolled out its 4th undercover video of its “Deep State Unmasked” series.

    The latest undercover video exposes two IRS officials bragging about targeting conservative groups and saying, “I don’t give a **** that is a crime.”

    The two officials in the report are Thomas Sheehy, an IRS tax examiner and member of the Austin Democratic Socialists of America in Texas, and Jerry Semasek, an IRS attorney in Washington, DC.
    ...
    “As our deep state investigation continues to unfold, four government agencies have responded resulting in the removal of two federal employees from their job duties. Stay tuned to see which Government Agency we unmask next,“ O’Keefe said in a statement.

    Project Veritas already got two Deep State scalps!

    Department of Justice paralegal, Allison Hrabar is OUT at the DOJ after undercover video revealed she reportedly uses government-owned software and computers to push a Socialist agenda and punish people she disagrees with.

    Last week, just a few hours after O’Keefe rolled out the video of Commie Natarajan Subramanian bragging about slowing down Trump’s agenda, he was removed from ongoing GAO work and cut off from access to GAO equipment.
    ...
    https://www.teaparty.org/dont-give-s...groups-325718/

    Leave a comment:


  • Mountain Man
    replied
    It used to be known as The Shadow Government. Different name, same business.

    Leave a comment:


  • Trung Si
    replied
    The Deep State does exist, it has always existed in all administrations, it's entrenched Bureaucrats undermining the elected Administration that they do not approve of, DemocRat or Republican, the latest blatant examples are Lois Lerner, Starzok and his girlfriend, they will always exist and there is not a damn thing we can do about it except for Bitch, Cry and Complain.
    Last edited by Trung Si; 25 Sep 18, 22:16.

    Leave a comment:


  • pamak
    replied
    Originally posted by G David Bock View Post

    Perhaps "meaningless" to left of center "liberal socialist" such as yourself. Also a more polite term than those oft used by the left-leaning liberal socialists to describe conservatives.

    The "flaming" part is a qualifier meaning the profile~sort of "liberal socialist" most likely to be found wearing "pussy hats", active in the "Resist" movement that sprung up post November 2016, and also most likely to engage in the sort of obstructionist and sabotage~sedition sort of conduct as shown by those in the Veritas tape "interviews".



    Actually more than half his co-workers in that office have left of center views/ideology/politics and would vote such. As I stated above, there's a smaller portion of them that would be more active in "resistance" .



    Again, in your imagination and delusions. Actual demographics show only about a quarter of the population would describe themselves as either Liberal or Conservative with about half or more claiming to be moderate or "middle of the road". Interestingly, this breakdown aside, only about half of the population that could vote did so in the Nov. 2016 elections.

    Also, the "flaming" applies to that subset most inclined to engage in sabotage, demonstrations/riots, "AntiFa", etc.

    Since this topic is taking this tangent, here's something some may find interesting;
    "World's Smallest Political Quiz";
    https://www.theadvocates.org/quiz/
    - As with anything of this sort, how honest one is with self is a factor in how accurate this might be.


    As I clearly said "such ratio sounds about right considering that 50% of the population are flaming liberals according to conservatives"

    So, the point is not how people describe themselves but how conservatives like you and your son describe the 50% of the country that are not hardcore republicans.

    Also, are you telling me that your son claims that antifa guys are employed in federal agencies? Because if this is his claim, there is another reason to dismiss him. This is like having a liberal claim that 1/3 to a half of the federal workforce are (or support) racists or neonazi, alt-right activists! You would not accept so easily such claim, right? Most probably such claim would make you think that the source of such information is EXTREMELY biased!

    Leave a comment:


  • pamak
    replied
    Originally posted by ljadw View Post

    YOU DID NOT !!
    You gave examples from Fox News when it used information that Fox News claimed was from anonymous officials requesting anonimity .
    Besides, officials working for the government have the right to leak as long as these leaks benefit the government, but thet have no right to leak information that hurts the government even if this information is true .


    Keep entertain us..

    I assume you try to argue that Fox News makes things up when it presents information from anonymous sources that support republican presidents (Soros must have bought it too)

    By the way, if you do believe what you say then you have to accept that nothing in the videos shows that the leaked information hurt the government. Such leaks may have actually benefited it.
    Last edited by pamak; 24 Sep 18, 16:03.

    Leave a comment:


  • G David Bock
    replied
    Originally posted by Karri View Post
    Lol, it's like reading nazi racial theories. "socialists have smaller skull radius, and thus are unable to comprehend what money is". I don't know why you keep thinking this way. Do you?
    LOL!

    I keep thinking this way because fifty plus years of knowing and dealing with liberals and socialists has shown they are far more likely to display "nazi racial theories" type thinking and actions than Conservatives. At least here in the USA. Results may vary in "The Old World".

    Leave a comment:


  • G David Bock
    replied
    Originally posted by pamak View Post

    The term "flaming liberal socialist" is meaningless considering that conservatives often use such term to describe people who are not conservatives.
    Perhaps "meaningless" to left of center "liberal socialist" such as yourself. Also a more polite term than those oft used by the left-leaning liberal socialists to describe conservatives.

    The "flaming" part is a qualifier meaning the profile~sort of "liberal socialist" most likely to be found wearing "pussy hats", active in the "Resist" movement that sprung up post November 2016, and also most likely to engage in the sort of obstructionist and sabotage~sedition sort of conduct as shown by those in the Veritas tape "interviews".

    Originally posted by pamak View Post
    ... This means that the claim that "a third to half of coworkers " are "liberal-socialists" may actually mean that a "third-to half of coworkers" are left of your conservative son.
    Actually more than half his co-workers in that office have left of center views/ideology/politics and would vote such. As I stated above, there's a smaller portion of them that would be more active in "resistance" .

    Originally posted by pamak View Post
    ... Such ratio sounds about right considering that 50% of the population are flaming liberals according to conservatives.
    Again, in your imagination and delusions. Actual demographics show only about a quarter of the population would describe themselves as either Liberal or Conservative with about half or more claiming to be moderate or "middle of the road". Interestingly, this breakdown aside, only about half of the population that could vote did so in the Nov. 2016 elections.

    Also, the "flaming" applies to that subset most inclined to engage in sabotage, demonstrations/riots, "AntiFa", etc.

    Since this topic is taking this tangent, here's something some may find interesting;
    "World's Smallest Political Quiz";
    https://www.theadvocates.org/quiz/
    - As with anything of this sort, how honest one is with self is a factor in how accurate this might be.

    Leave a comment:


  • Karri
    replied
    Lol, it's like reading nazi racial theories. "socialists have smaller skull radius, and thus are unable to comprehend what money is". I don't know why you keep thinking this way. Do you?

    Leave a comment:


  • G David Bock
    replied
    Originally posted by Half Pint John View Post

    I'm aware that is a totally foolish and ignorant statement. It's like saying most of the US is going broke and then concentrate on the US South.


    Other way around.

    Most socialists have only vague clues on how wealth is created or understand the need for fiscal responsibility and budget balance, especially within government. Also, most socialists tend to find employment in guv'mint or other parts of the wealth redistribution part of economy and society since they have challenges understanding and being productive in the wealth-creation sector. In other words, most socialists I know tend to live off of other peoples/taxpayers money and when that isn't enough, they start running up guv'mint debt.

    Examine the debt to GDP shown here and it's most of and the major nations in Europe that are carrying high loads of debt compared to GDP;
    http://usdebtclock.org/world-debt-clock.html

    Leave a comment:

Latest Topics

Collapse

Working...
X