The passing of John McCain and the veneration of nearly all service people and near deification of war heroes since VN?
The venerable John McCain’s passing raises the interesting issue of the status and the way the ‘soldier’ is perceived and regarded in the modern USA.
I’m re-working some old 1970’s tutorial material along the lines ‘War and warriors - mythologies and realities’ (yeah, yeah, amazingly original hey
) with a view to eventually assist in presenting a new tute along those lines.
I’m interested in the phenomenon of the adoration that nowadays seems to surround the position of anyone ‘in the services’.
Cripes even Doc Phil makes a point of saying ‘Oh by the way before we start, thank you for your service to this country
’ every time he has a former service man or woman on his show.
(Ummmm… …err…ummm… not that I watch the show, I’m just going by what my wife tells me.)
This mythologising of vets and near deification war heroes (and don’t get me wrong McCain clearly was one) seems to be a near permanent feature of the current political landscape.
An old episode on Australian Radio National’s ‘Late Night Live’ covering the Perth Writers Festival on modern warfare saw a question raised by American writer Kevin Powers (an Iraq War veteran, author of ‘The Yellow Birds’):
“one of the products of Vietnam has been this kind of blind inclination to valorise every soldier. To kind of deify them. To put them on a pedestal. A pedestal can be an isolating place.”
I’m sure it’s the last thing McCain himself would have wanted.
So, I’m interested in whether posters think that what Powers says is basically true?
Vietnam left an indelible mark on America so the cliché goes (which of course begs the question about what the hell it did tenfold to Indo-China itself! – BTW correctly, it’s the Indo-China War).
Not just the war itself but the subsequent treatment and ‘regard’ of returning veterans from the late 60’s to at least the late 70’s.
Has the Post VN veneration (or near deification) of service men starting in the Reagan essentially been an overreaction to that era.
Powers also made the point in relation to America ‘learning from its past mistakes’ (Indian Wars, Vietnam, Iraq) is that:
‘When America losses its innocence you can be assured that it will get it back very soon.”
Meaning I guess that America’s appetite for foreign ventures, justified or not, may wax and wane due to results for a particular episode but will probably never be completely sated.
My history professors had an informal motto back in my Uni days which went something like: 'Straight answers to straight questions are for idiots and cowards, you're here to learn how to think not what to think!'
regards lodestar
The venerable John McCain’s passing raises the interesting issue of the status and the way the ‘soldier’ is perceived and regarded in the modern USA.
I’m re-working some old 1970’s tutorial material along the lines ‘War and warriors - mythologies and realities’ (yeah, yeah, amazingly original hey

I’m interested in the phenomenon of the adoration that nowadays seems to surround the position of anyone ‘in the services’.
Cripes even Doc Phil makes a point of saying ‘Oh by the way before we start, thank you for your service to this country

(Ummmm… …err…ummm… not that I watch the show, I’m just going by what my wife tells me.)
This mythologising of vets and near deification war heroes (and don’t get me wrong McCain clearly was one) seems to be a near permanent feature of the current political landscape.
An old episode on Australian Radio National’s ‘Late Night Live’ covering the Perth Writers Festival on modern warfare saw a question raised by American writer Kevin Powers (an Iraq War veteran, author of ‘The Yellow Birds’):
“one of the products of Vietnam has been this kind of blind inclination to valorise every soldier. To kind of deify them. To put them on a pedestal. A pedestal can be an isolating place.”
I’m sure it’s the last thing McCain himself would have wanted.
So, I’m interested in whether posters think that what Powers says is basically true?
Vietnam left an indelible mark on America so the cliché goes (which of course begs the question about what the hell it did tenfold to Indo-China itself! – BTW correctly, it’s the Indo-China War).
Not just the war itself but the subsequent treatment and ‘regard’ of returning veterans from the late 60’s to at least the late 70’s.
Has the Post VN veneration (or near deification) of service men starting in the Reagan essentially been an overreaction to that era.
Powers also made the point in relation to America ‘learning from its past mistakes’ (Indian Wars, Vietnam, Iraq) is that:
‘When America losses its innocence you can be assured that it will get it back very soon.”
Meaning I guess that America’s appetite for foreign ventures, justified or not, may wax and wane due to results for a particular episode but will probably never be completely sated.
My history professors had an informal motto back in my Uni days which went something like: 'Straight answers to straight questions are for idiots and cowards, you're here to learn how to think not what to think!'
regards lodestar
Comment