Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trey Gowdy damages Mueller's investigation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Arnold J Rimmer
    replied
    Originally posted by wolfhnd View Post
    I watched a special on Lisa Page's testimony today. She more or less said that the Comey was just carrying out the wishes of the Obama administration when he gave his little no intent speech on Clinton. I wonder what they promised him?
    Whatever it was, I guessing they did not deliver.

    Leave a comment:


  • wolfhnd
    replied
    I watched a special on Lisa Page's testimony today. She more or less said that the Comey was just carrying out the wishes of the Obama administration when he gave his little no intent speech on Clinton. I wonder what they promised him?

    Leave a comment:


  • Massena
    replied
    Finally Gowdey does something positive:

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...cid=spartandhp

    Leave a comment:


  • Massena
    replied
    It seems that General Hayden doesn't agree that Gowdey, or anyone else, has damaged the investigation. He believes that more indictments are inbound.

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/13/polit...ntv/index.html

    Leave a comment:


  • Massena
    replied
    Well, TAG, how do you know that Brennan 'hates Trump'? It seems that you believe that anyone who does not support Trump hates him. That is a ridiculous assumption.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddybhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post

    Yea.... Sure... This is the same bunch run by guys like CIA director Brennan who hates Trump... If they knew about the attempts why not stop them or warn the parties? Oh, that's right, they did warn them... But the Democrats ignored that and did nothing. Then when they were hacked, they refused to let any sort of law enforcement or computer security professionals look at their servers, Hillary's included.

    The problem with your argument is that the Democrats got hacked repeatedly. Even after the first time, they got hit again. Hillary's server is something unique to her. The Republicans didn't have anyone so criminal in their ranks that they'd try to brazenly run their own computer network outside the government. It seems to me that the reason is the Democrats were far poorer at computer security than the Republicans.

    So, it is you that's making up a fantasy scenario. Ever consider a job at CNN? You'd fit right in over there!
    Uhm TAG the Bush administration deleted 2 MILLION private emails lertaining to gov business and the current admin also used private emails......

    Leave a comment:


  • Massena
    replied
    Just a question for the group who is against Mueller, the investigation, and have pronounced on the hearing the other day:

    How many of you who are critical of Strvok and support the Republican Congressmen who disgraced themselves actually watched the hearing instead of 'learning' about it second or third hand? I watched it and the derogatory comments directed at the FBI, et al, and praising the Republicans made here certainly don't support what actually happened.

    Leave a comment:


  • Massena
    replied
    And this is also interesting:

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...cid=spartandhp

    Leave a comment:


  • Massena
    replied
    Trump has spent more money on his golfing trips and to Mara-Lago on the government dime than Mueller has had to use for the investigation he was appointed to lead.

    Leave a comment:


  • Massena
    replied
    Are you just jealous of the FBI perhaps because you couldn't qualify for it?

    Leave a comment:


  • Arnold J Rimmer
    replied
    Originally posted by Trung Si View Post
    Mueller ain't got Zilch and won't have Zilch on Trump, this year, next year or the year after that, but the News Media will have something to talk about, ( making them Money), and on it goes, making me sick!
    Not to mention Mueller's budget.

    This farce has to play out, but hopefully it will deter other nonsensical undertakings.

    And perhaps for Congress to take a hard look at the Famous But Incompetent with an eye to breaking up the organization.

    Leave a comment:


  • pamak
    replied
    Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post

    Yea.... Sure... This is the same bunch run by guys like CIA director Brennan who hates Trump... If they knew about the attempts why not stop them or warn the parties? Oh, that's right, they did warn them... But the Democrats ignored that and did nothing. Then when they were hacked, they refused to let any sort of law enforcement or computer security professionals look at their servers, Hillary's included.

    The problem with your argument is that the Democrats got hacked repeatedly. Even after the first time, they got hit again. Hillary's server is something unique to her. The Republicans didn't have anyone so criminal in their ranks that they'd try to brazenly run their own computer network outside the government. It seems to me that the reason is the Democrats were far poorer at computer security than the Republicans.

    So, it is you that's making up a fantasy scenario. Ever consider a job at CNN? You'd fit right in over there!
    The leadership in all agencies has changed and the assessments remain the same. It is not about hating Trump! It is about making rational intelligence assessments. And sorry, but as I said in the previous posts, Russians did have damaging information about Trump. Do you really believe that they could not leak information about the Trump Tower meeting? They did not release such damaging information because they wanted to help Trump, not because they could not.

    Leave a comment:


  • pamak
    replied
    Originally posted by Freebird View Post
    How did they show this exactly? Did they interview Putin?

    It's also very plausible that they wanted to trash Hillary, based on her/Obama's prior efforts to interfere in Russia's interests, that they just didn't like her.

    Also, given that it was almost a forgone conclusion that Hillary would win, they simply wanted to damage her reputation to make her less effective in the White House.


    As for making things up, the RNC wasn't stupid enough to neglect its computer security, while the DNC was
    Bold mine:

    read their reports and testimonies...


    They explain there how they came to such assessments.
    The Senate Committee also came to the same conclusions.
    I am not going to list everything from memory, but I do recall that among other things they noticed that the Russians were leaking only information that was damaging Clinton.

    Leave a comment:


  • Freebird
    replied
    Originally posted by pamak View Post

    Bold mine

    Apparently you are not aware of the intelligence assessment which told us that the Russians used more resources to target the democrats and showed a desire to help Trump win the elections. So you make things up when you explain the events by arguing that republicans had better security systems.
    How did they show this exactly? Did they interview Putin?

    It's also very plausible that they wanted to trash Hillary, based on her/Obama's prior efforts to interfere in Russia's interests, that they just didn't like her.

    Also, given that it was almost a forgone conclusion that Hillary would win, they simply wanted to damage her reputation to make her less effective in the White House.


    As for making things up, the RNC wasn't stupid enough to neglect its computer security, while the DNC was

    Leave a comment:


  • Persephone
    replied
    Trump called it in Jan of 2017...


    "As far as hacking, I think it was Russia," he said at a Jan. 11 press conference from Trump Tower in New York

    Leave a comment:

Latest Topics

Collapse

Working...
X