Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Latest Assault (that I know of) Committed by the Tolerant and Loving Anti-Trumpers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Salinator
    replied
    Pleas knock it off with the personal commentary and bickering.

    It is off-topic, disruptive, and is derailing this thread.

    Stop talking about each other and return to topic.

    ACG Staff

    Leave a comment:


  • pamak
    replied
    Originally posted by Darth Holliday View Post

    You know its the internet, right...? If you would ease up, perhaps others would respond in kind...
    Are you now taking his side?

    Leave a comment:


  • Darth Holliday
    replied
    Originally posted by pamak View Post

    Interesting:

    Using the Advance search you can find whatever old post you want

    Here is one yours from 31 December 2017

    https://forums.armchairgeneral.com/f...65#post4568865



    Your excuse does not work. Nice try...

    Ohh, and you still have not answered why you did not report such violation at the moment you noticed it. Did you discount such threat because of our good relationship we never had?
    You know its the internet, right...? If you would ease up, perhaps others would respond in kind...

    Leave a comment:


  • pamak
    replied
    Originally posted by The Exorcist View Post
    Interesting, the list of posts under a member's heading only goes back a few dozen posts, meaning that someone that posts so often can bury old posts very quickly. A matter of days in this case. And it would also appear that posts can now be edited far more than 24 hours in the past.

    What I would like to know is how long it will take before that Ignore function is back up and running.
    Ever?
    I'd rather not see any more updates from my own personal stalker.
    Missed your claim about the editing.

    Edited posts have a clear time stamp and it is easy to see that they are edited.

    Leave a comment:


  • pamak
    replied
    Originally posted by The Exorcist View Post
    Interesting, the list of posts under a member's heading only goes back a few dozen posts, meaning that someone that posts so often can bury old posts very quickly. A matter of days in this case. And it would also appear that posts can now be edited far more than 24 hours in the past.

    What I would like to know is how long it will take before that Ignore function is back up and running.
    Ever?
    I'd rather not see any more updates from my own personal stalker.
    Interesting:

    Using the Advance search you can find whatever old post you want

    Here is one yours from 31 December 2017

    https://forums.armchairgeneral.com/f...65#post4568865

    Originally posted by The Exorcist View Post
    (where did everyone else go? Seems like its just us now...)

    All of that looks good, but with just 6 x Fighters per carrier it will be hard to saturate an enemy's defenses unless several carriers are working together. Their escort on a distant deployment also looks a little thin.

    A Navy defends its home, as well as attacks. How would you divide your fleet?


    I am going to stick with just my one idea, I stopped with 4.4 Billion still on the table partly due to exhaustion ...
    Yeah, I have to switch out the 40 x LAMPS for 70 x European ASW Helos. Saves me half a Billion, which sets up half a dozen mini-squadrons that can be spread out all over the place, and that 1/2-Bill can be used for a whole bunch of Patrol/Police-Boats.
    .... my mind keeps going back to P.I., and how this fleet of mine could make the game for that place. As huge as it is, it can be controlled, and I think what I have fits their needs perfectly.
    Your excuse does not work. Nice try...

    Ohh, and you still have not answered why you did not report such violation at the moment you noticed it. Did you discount such threat because of our good relationship we never had?
    Last edited by pamak; 10 Jul 18, 00:56.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arnold J Rimmer
    replied
    Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    MSNBC didn't do anything about Ed Schultz saying he'd commit voter fraud both on his radio show and on his show on the network...



    While Schultz is no longer on MSNBC, he was at the time he said this.
    Well, he's gone now.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Exorcist
    replied
    Interesting, the list of posts under a member's heading only goes back a few dozen posts, meaning that someone that posts so often can bury old posts very quickly. A matter of days in this case. And it would also appear that posts can now be edited far more than 24 hours in the past.

    What I would like to know is how long it will take before that Ignore function is back up and running.
    Ever?
    I'd rather not see any more updates from my own personal stalker.

    Leave a comment:


  • pamak
    replied
    Originally posted by The Exorcist View Post

    "Originally posted by Bad Wolf View Post
    Direct me to that precise wording of the veiled threat.

    BW"


    Great, now I have to sort through all of that guy's posts to find it?
    Jeez... I really need to stick to my own idea about not responding to these guys.
    After your failure to provide evidence, I have decided that I should report this post and clear things with the moderators regarding the leeway people have to make claims without providing evidence that other members threatened to expose and destroy them with a hacker. If it is an issue of freedom of speech here, and there are no consequences for such attitude, I will accept the verdict.

    The original claim for this claim that I threatened to destroy Exorcist with a hacker is in the following post

    https://forums.armchairgeneral.com/f...20#post5045220

    Salinator, and whoever among you is this Bad Wolf (who is CERTAINLY aware of the incident), I will wait for the response here, and if (and how) you think such post should be treated by you.
    Last edited by pamak; 09 Jul 18, 22:42.

    Leave a comment:


  • T. A. Gardner
    replied
    Originally posted by Darth Holliday View Post

    The pig just died yesterday......

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/05/o...ies-at-64.html

    Unless its fake news....
    One less case of voter fraud to worry about there...

    Leave a comment:


  • Darth Holliday
    replied
    Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    MSNBC didn't do anything about Ed Schultz saying he'd commit voter fraud both on his radio show and on his show on the network...



    While Schultz is no longer on MSNBC, he was at the time he said this.
    The pig just died yesterday......

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/05/o...ies-at-64.html

    Unless its fake news....

    Leave a comment:


  • T. A. Gardner
    replied
    MSNBC didn't do anything about Ed Schultz saying he'd commit voter fraud both on his radio show and on his show on the network...



    While Schultz is no longer on MSNBC, he was at the time he said this.

    Leave a comment:


  • G David Bock
    replied
    MSNBC Does Not Merely Permit Fabrications Against Democratic Party Critics. It Encourages and Rewards Them.
    ...
    During the 2016 primary and general election campaigns, various MSNBC hosts were openly campaigning for Hillary Clinton. One of the network’s programs featured Malcolm Nance (pictured above), whose background is quite sketchy but is presented by the cable network (and now by NBC News) as an “intelligence expert” and former intelligence officer for the U.S. Navy.

    On August 20, 2016, weekend host Joy Reid asked Nance about the supposed “affinity” for Russia harbored by Jill Stein supporters. In response, Nance told MSNBC viewers: “Jill Stein has a show on Russia Today.” You can still watch the video of this claim here on MSNBC’s own website or see it here:
    ...
    Whatever your views might be about Stein and her third-party candidacy, there is no disputing the fact that Nance’s statement was a falsehood, a fabrication, a lie. Stein did not have a show on RT, nor did she ever host a show on RT. What Nance said was made up out of whole cloth — fabricated — in order to encourage MSNBC viewers to believe that Stein, one of the candidates running against Clinton, was a paid agent of the Kremlin and employee of RT.

    Reid allowed Nance’s lie to stand. Perhaps she did not realize at the time that it was a lie. But subsequently, a campaign was launched to urge MSNBC to correct the lie it broadcast, based on the assumption that MSNBC — which is part of NBC News — was a normal news outlet that functions in accordance with basic journalistic principles and would, of course, correct a false statement once that was brought to its attention.

    The media watchdog group FAIR repeatedly documented the lie told by Nance and urged MSNBC to issue a correction. The Intercept wrote about this falsehood on several occasions and also noted that MSNBC was refusing to issue a correction of what everyone knows is a false — but an obviously quite significant — claim. Multiple tweets were directed at NBC News, MSNBC, Nance, and Reid asking them to correct the fabrication to their viewers:
    ...
    To date — almost two years later — neither NBC News nor MSNBC, nor a single journalist who works for either one of those media outlets has corrected this significant falsehood, despite obviously knowing that it was broadcast to their viewers. In other words, NBC News and MSNBC know that they told viewers something that was materially false, and yet refuse to correct it. Please, defenders of this network: Tell me what that says about its integrity, about its real function, about whether it is a real news outlet.

    Worse, not only was Nance never sanctioned in any way for the lie he told, but he was rewarded: He has since gone from “MSNBC contributor” to “MSNBC intelligence analyst,” and is far more pervasive on the network, and its hosts have spent the month aggressively promoting his new book on how Vladimir Putin is destroying U.S. democracy.

    On MSNBC, lies are not corrected; they are rewarded, provided the lies are designed to smear the reputations of Democratic Party critics. Is this not definitive and conclusive proof of that: that this is not a news outlet but a political arm of the Democratic Party? What else could possibly explain, let alone justify, behavior like this? I’m asking that earnestly.
    ...
    https://theintercept.com/2018/07/08/...-rewards-them/

    So MSNBC, NBC, and Nance presented Fake News and get away with it.
    Last edited by G David Bock; 09 Jul 18, 16:41.

    Leave a comment:


  • pamak
    replied
    Originally posted by The Exorcist View Post

    Great, now I have to sort through all of that guy's posts to find it?
    Jeez... I really need to stick to my own idea about not responding to these guys.


    So, you claim that this happened a long time ago? Why did not you mention anything then? Did we at any point have such good relationship that you decided to give me a pass for THREATENING YOU?

    Leave a comment:


  • T. A. Gardner
    replied
    Originally posted by The Exorcist View Post

    It should be no surprise that they are like that. We are dealing with full-bore fanatics here that can't even cogitate the Walk Away movement.
    And without Charloteesville they have nothing, literally nothing, and event that was set up by proven fake Right Wingers in the first place on threads right here that they also ignored.

    and it gets worse;
    RED HEN, CIVILITY, EXTREMISM ANDVIOLENCE




    https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/2...iel-greenfield
    Ever watch the show on VICELAND TV called Hate Thy Neighbor? The guy that does it went to a "Free Speech Week" that was to be held at UC Berkeley. Milo Yanapolis (sp) was supposed to be there to speak. He interviews the public head / face of the local Antifa and she's quite open about them doing whatever it takes, however violent, to shut down his speech.

    The guys on the Right are fairly reasonable. The Left, again and again, in the show are insane and unreasonable. The university held a press conference to explain why the event was cancelled. Two female Leftists show up in the middle of it and starting shouting political rhetoric. The press people tell them to shut up. They don't. The university officials say "We're finished," get up and leave.

    The Leftists had ZERO tolerance for anyone that wasn't in lockstep with their point of view. They made that crystal clear.

    The lady with the glasses in this clip is the head / face of Antifa in Berkeley... She was arrested and charged with felonies for other "stuff" she'd done on the campus.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Exorcist
    replied
    Originally posted by Bad Wolf View Post

    Direct me to that precise wording of the veiled threat.

    BW
    Great, now I have to sort through all of that guy's posts to find it?
    Jeez... I really need to stick to my own idea about not responding to these guys.

    Leave a comment:

Latest Topics

Collapse

Working...
X