Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mueller is off the reservation...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Bwaha View Post
    Fixed it for you.
    Thanks, but at this time it's just "trying". Yes, mostly succeeding, but he's still got stiff opposition from many liberals that are in power, all whinging and gnashing their teeth about it at every turn.
    The First Amendment applies to SMS, Emails, Blogs, online news, the Fourth applies to your cell phone, computer, and your car, but the Second only applies to muskets?

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Hida Akechi View Post
      Thanks, but at this time it's just "trying". Yes, mostly succeeding, but he's still got stiff opposition from many liberals that are in power, all whinging and gnashing their teeth about it at every turn.
      The more they lie and have bs claims the better he looks to the public overall. We'll see how it plays out in the mid-terms, but I think the Dems are going to tank. They're too dirty and when all players on their side start going to jail and the facts come out...
      Credo quia absurdum.


      Quantum mechanics describes nature as absurd from the point of view of common sense. And yet it fully agrees with experiment. So I hope you can accept nature as She is - absurd! - Richard Feynman

      Comment


      • #18
        Federal judge slaps Robert Mueller with humiliating fact check in courtroom over massive ‘error’
        ...
        Special counsel Robert Mueller was handed another humiliating moment in federal court last week when it was revealed one of the Russian companies he accused of meddling in the 2016 election did not exist during the time period he alleged it did.

        Earlier this year, Mueller indicted three Russian companies — the Internet Research Agency, Concord Management and Consulting LLC and Concord Catering — in addition to 13 Russian individuals for allegedly interfering in the election.

        According to reports, during a court hearing on Wednesday to arraign Concord Management, U.S. Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey asked one of Concord’s attorneys, Eric Dubelier, if he was also representing Concord Catering. They were not because the company did not exist during the time period Mueller alleges, Dubelier said.

        “What about Concord Catering? The government makes an allegation that there’s some association. I don’t mean for you to — do you represent them, or not, today? And are we arraigning them as well?” the judge asked.

        Dubelier responded: “We’re not. And the reason for that, Your Honor, is I think we’re dealing with a situation of the government having indicted the proverbial ham sandwich.”

        “That company didn’t exist as a legal entity during the time period alleged by the government. If at some later time they show me that it did exist, we would probably represent them. But for purposes of today, no, we do not,” Dubelier explained.
        ...
        https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/0...-massive-error

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by G David Bock View Post
          Federal judge slaps Robert Mueller with humiliating fact check in courtroom over massive ‘error’
          ...
          Special counsel Robert Mueller was handed another humiliating moment in federal court last week when it was revealed one of the Russian companies he accused of meddling in the 2016 election did not exist during the time period he alleged it did.

          Earlier this year, Mueller indicted three Russian companies — the Internet Research Agency, Concord Management and Consulting LLC and Concord Catering — in addition to 13 Russian individuals for allegedly interfering in the election.

          According to reports, during a court hearing on Wednesday to arraign Concord Management, U.S. Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey asked one of Concord’s attorneys, Eric Dubelier, if he was also representing Concord Catering. They were not because the company did not exist during the time period Mueller alleges, Dubelier said.

          “What about Concord Catering? The government makes an allegation that there’s some association. I don’t mean for you to — do you represent them, or not, today? And are we arraigning them as well?” the judge asked.

          Dubelier responded: “We’re not. And the reason for that, Your Honor, is I think we’re dealing with a situation of the government having indicted the proverbial ham sandwich.”

          “That company didn’t exist as a legal entity during the time period alleged by the government. If at some later time they show me that it did exist, we would probably represent them. But for purposes of today, no, we do not,” Dubelier explained.
          ...
          https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/0...-massive-error

          So, if this is correct, then one of the three companies Mueller indicted is going to defend themselves and has answered the subpoena. Worse, they're demanding discovery and all documents that were used to indict them.
          A second company didn't exist at the time, so that's a major awshit on Mueller's team because it makes them look like totally clueless F ups.
          The third company hasn't responded. They probably don't need to at this point as companies one and two have pretty much demolished Mueller's case on their own.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Bwaha View Post
            The more they lie and have bs claims the better he looks to the public overall. We'll see how it plays out in the mid-terms, but I think the Dems are going to tank. They're too dirty and when all players on their side start going to jail and the facts come out...
            Don't underestimate the power of the Democrat's Voting Fraud. They always have that to back them up.
            The First Amendment applies to SMS, Emails, Blogs, online news, the Fourth applies to your cell phone, computer, and your car, but the Second only applies to muskets?

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Hida Akechi View Post
              Don't underestimate the power of the Democrat's Voting Fraud. They always have that to back them up.
              That only works if it's close. If it's not close, they can't cheat.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
                That only works if it's close. If it's not close, they can't cheat.
                Yeah, I know. I've known that for a while--it's particularly true and dangerous in POTUS elections. If a Repub wins a close election, then it was actually a landslide minus the cheating from the left...

                I'm with every other sane person, I think the Dems are going to take yet another hit. But there's always the chance that their usual voter fraud will see them through in some parts of the country.
                The First Amendment applies to SMS, Emails, Blogs, online news, the Fourth applies to your cell phone, computer, and your car, but the Second only applies to muskets?

                Comment


                • #23
                  Back onto topic, recent article in The Hill.

                  http://thehill.com/opinion/white-hou...ssian-oligarch

                  It appears that Mueller, as Director, along with Andrew McCabe, directly involved a Russian Aluminum (Aluminium?) Magnate in paying for and facilitating a search for a former FBI Agent working for the CIA in Iran. Mueller did so because he couldn't use US funds, that would have been illegal. So he used the Russian money to skirt US sanctions.

                  In payment to the Russian, that we know of, the FBI facilitated as many as 8 Diplomatic Visas for him to visit the US (he isn't and wasn't a diplomat) and at least 1 Visa under the FBI's "Parole" exceptions.....the Russian was already being investigated for possible illegal activity.

                  And now this Russian is one that's been looked into for 'collusion' related stuff. Collusion? He was colluding just fine with Director Mueller, Deputy Director McCabe, and other FBI officials less than a decade ago.....
                  Tacitos, Satrap of Kyrene

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Tuebor View Post
                    Don't matter there would have been an investigation anyway. In the long run this could prove a political benefit for Trump.

                    Tuebor
                    yes but the tone of the investigation would of been different. more of a 9-11 type investigation vs what are you hiding investigation


                    Actually it pretty much doomed him remember he got lucky and won by 100k votes Only takes 50001 of those voters to change there minds.

                    He is toast in 2020 unless things change


                    Granted if he pulls of a good deal with NK he wins maybe

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by TacCovert4 View Post
                      Back onto topic, recent article in The Hill.

                      http://thehill.com/opinion/white-hou...ssian-oligarch

                      It appears that Mueller, as Director, along with Andrew McCabe, directly involved a Russian Aluminum (Aluminium?) Magnate in paying for and facilitating a search for a former FBI Agent working for the CIA in Iran. Mueller did so because he couldn't use US funds, that would have been illegal. So he used the Russian money to skirt US sanctions.

                      In payment to the Russian, that we know of, the FBI facilitated as many as 8 Diplomatic Visas for him to visit the US (he isn't and wasn't a diplomat) and at least 1 Visa under the FBI's "Parole" exceptions.....the Russian was already being investigated for possible illegal activity.

                      And now this Russian is one that's been looked into for 'collusion' related stuff. Collusion? He was colluding just fine with Director Mueller, Deputy Director McCabe, and other FBI officials less than a decade ago.....
                      come on tac its all spy games

                      you don't talk to good guys to get intel on the bad guys

                      or does your police department collude on a daily basis with criminals

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by craven View Post
                        come on tac its all spy games

                        you don't talk to good guys to get intel on the bad guys

                        or does your police department collude on a daily basis with criminals
                        We don't give special treatment or ask criminals to pay for police operations.

                        Mueller has no moral high horse. And the first bunch of idiots is not responsible for international intelligence operations.
                        Tacitos, Satrap of Kyrene

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
                          Now he's probing Trump's inauguration donations...
                          That's because the Predator-in-Chief has a long history of being a lying, corrupt individual.

                          Try to get this:

                          The Two-Timer-in-Chief is under investigation for possible collusion with Russia. Would it surprise you at all if there was collusion? Anyone with half a brain knows that the Chump would be happy to collude with Russia. If it gained him anything. Illegal or not.

                          The Predator-in-Chief's lawyer admitted that a porn star was paid money by another Chump lawyer to prevent bad press from tainting his 2016 campaign. The payments were not reported. If Chump knew about it, that's a felony. Would it surprise you in the least that Chump would pay off a porn star to hide one of his many illicit affairs? Illegal or not?

                          The Predator-in-Chief fired the head of the FBI while he himself was under investigation. If he did that to knowingly impede the investigation into his wide and varied nefarious activities, it's a felony. Would it surprise you in the least if it turns out that the Chump fired Comey to impede the ongoing investigation? Illegal or not?

                          Given the amount of time that the "Chump Crime Family" has been operating, it's bound to take some time to finish the investigation. Their corrupt and ugly tentacles lead everywhere and were in full swing during the 2016 campaign.
                          "I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. I just kiss. I don't even wait. You can do anything... Grab them by the [redacted]. You can do anything."
                          -The President of the United States of America.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            The conclusions of the Senate Intelligence Committee are in and it isn't good news for Trump.

                            https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...cid=spartandhp

                            I guess he didn't have any of the Senators in his pocket like he did Devin Nunes from the House Intelligence Committee.

                            Well done for the Senate.
                            We are not now that strength which in old days
                            Moved earth and heaven; that which we are we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts
                            Made weak by time and fate but strong in will
                            To strive to seek to find and not to yield.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Another bullet from the Senate. It looks like the Trump campaign was 'off the reservation':

                              https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...cid=spartandhp
                              We are not now that strength which in old days
                              Moved earth and heaven; that which we are we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts
                              Made weak by time and fate but strong in will
                              To strive to seek to find and not to yield.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by TacCovert4 View Post
                                We don't give special treatment or ask criminals to pay for police operations.

                                Mueller has no moral high horse. And the first bunch of idiots is not responsible for international intelligence operations.
                                ahh but you get information from then hence your colluding

                                There just different types of it depending on who doing what where and why


                                counter intel stuff has different rules than law enforcement

                                Comment

                                Latest Topics

                                Collapse

                                Working...
                                X