Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The United Nations is anti-Semitic- Trump Spiritual advisor

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    It's amazing the amount of politically correct hoops you have to jump through in order to not be labeled an anti-semite.

    Anything you say that's short of heaping praise on them is anti semitic.

    This level of PC culture isn't beneficial for anyone.
    "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
    - Benjamin Franklin

    The new right wing: hate Muslims, preaches tolerance for Nazis.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by American87 View Post
      We're not talking about policing the Middle East; we're talking about showing support for Israel The Israeli military can take care of it itself, at least until Iran gets a nuke, which liberals want it to do.
      If we're not talking about policing then it's on Israel to fight their own battles.

      Israel already has nukes which is what prompted Iran. What else would you expect.
      "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
      - Benjamin Franklin

      The new right wing: hate Muslims, preaches tolerance for Nazis.

      Comment


      • #93
        Over the years we've seen a lot of whoppers posted to ACG, but this is the biggest of them all, and I'm frankly shocked that no one took it up. For that the lot of you should be deeply ashamed of yourselves.

        Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
        We can start and end with the fact that Jews created our central banking system and still control it to this day.
        I didn't know that Alexander Hamilton was Jewish. Didn't know that about JP Morgan, either. Charles E Mitchell? Edmund Converse? David Rockefeller? Benjamin Strong? William Porter? Percy Johnson? Herbert Twitchell? George L Harrison? Jamie Dimon? Not a Jew in the bunch. The Federal Reserve's chairman wasn't Jewish until 1930, 26 years after the Fed's founding, and wouldn't boast another Jew in the top spot until 1970.

        I've worked in financial services for a long time now. I started out on Wall Street back when it was really The Street. Back then the only firm with Jewish leadership was Goldman Sachs, and they were a limited partnership back then, not a joint stock corporation like they are today. The firm I started at in the '90s was so WASP that they imported Englishmen from South Africa, fer cryin' out loud: not a single Jew held an upper-echelon executive officer position. Most of the major houses on The Street were like that. That reality alone gives lie to the tripe that "Jews created our central banking system and still control it to this day." They didn't create it, and they don't exert any kind of disproportionate control. Jews play alongside everybody else in the sandbox, that's all.

        Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
        "When a government is dependent for money upon the bankers, they and not the government leaders control the nation. This is because the hand that gives is above the hand that takes. Financiers are without patriotism and without decency."

        - Napoleon
        Yeah, French monarchs have always been good for gussying up their repudiation of debt with some kind of moral blather. In 1307 Phillip IV ordered all Templars in France arrested, opening the arrest warrant with "God is not pleased. We have enemies of the faith in the kingdom."

        By the mid-13th century, their military influence was beginning to wane, as the balance of religious power slipped from the Crusaders’ grasp. But the Templars remained strong in the west, and for some, their inordinate wealth and influence was increasingly seen as a threat.

        Not least by Philip of France, who after a war with the English, had been left heavily in debt, much of which was owed to the Templars. Keen to circumvent his obligations, he exploited rumours that the Templars were engaged in heretical practices, insisting that the Order be investigated. In 1307, he had several hundred French Templars arrested, many of whom were tortured in order to gain confessions of malfeasance. Charges ranged from corruption, fraud and obscenity, to idolatry, apostasy and heresy.

        "Pope Persecutes Knights Templar to Appease France," History Channel,
        Then again, Philip the Fair had experience with that kind of thing: the year before he expelled France's Jews -- to whom he owed vast sums, as well, and subsequently expropriated their property to his exchequer. Given Bonaparte's noted belligerence, I've got to suspect that his attitudes towards bankers -- like Thos Jefferson's -- were influenced by his level of indebtedness.

        Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
        Karl Marx was of prominent Jewish descant. He is Jewish.
        Nearly a century-and-a-half before Israel's founding, how could a person raised as a Lutheran be viewed as a Jew? Sonofabitch came of age before the advent of modern Zionism.

        Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
        Not to be rude or offensive to anyone, but if we're going in that direction we have to provide the full historical context.

        Jews saw these restrictions because they consistently tried to manipulate government for their own benefit and often to the detriment of the country's natural inhabitants.
        "Natural inhabitants," Gracie? The only region of the earth to which Homo sapiens is indigenous is the East Africa Rift Valley. Everywhere else, we're all interlopers -- Jew and Goy alike.

        Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
        I'm not at all proclaiming that the way they were treated was right, however it is important to note the reason and sequence of events.

        Similarly, I can say that African's were enslaved because they were viewed as inferior humans. That doesn't make it right, but that was the reason.
        On the one hand you're absolving Africans from responsibility for their enslavement, but on the other you're holding Jews responsible for their persecution. I fail to understand the rationale for this dichotomy.

        Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
        Jews were held from certain positions in Europe because they abused positions of power.
        How did they abuse what they never had?

        Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
        They would come into a foreign country, take over powerful positions, prop up their own people and damn everyone else.
        You mean like invaders? Jews formed a Jew army and conquered territories in Europe and oppressed the inhabitants?

        Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
        We still see this behavior today. Soros being a prominent example.
        Naturally, being a Shylock. Of course, such suspicions never fall on a JP Morgan or a Jamie Dimon or a David Rockefeller: two WASPs and a Greek.

        Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
        Busing thousands of people across the US to start riots and cause political turmoil in our country.
        You mean like SEIU Local 1199 does? Martin Luther King's "favorite union"? When was the last time they had Jewish leadership -- the 1940s?

        If you're going to level that accusation against Soros, then logically you have to level it against all who've done the same -- and that's a pretty long list.

        Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
        This is nothing new and standard practice when looking at their history. I'm speaking to only a certain segment of the Jewish population, specifically the globalists. Who yes, are a significant threat.
        Found your margarine.



        Same isle as the tin foil hats.

        Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
        We're not being antisemtic we're just discussing factual history.
        As soon as you produce some facts, then we'll be talking history. Until then, you're just talking trash -- old, tired, trash.

        Now how is it that no other ACG picked up on his Alfred Rosenberg-style of antisemitism? There's not a line in his posts that wasn't lifted whole from propaganda of the past, starting with The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, and ending with Goebbels' Titanic. All he's done is copy-and-paste -- and you chumps missed it. How?
        I was married for two ******* years! Hell would be like Club Med! - Sam Kinison

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by slick_miester View Post
          Over the years we've seen a lot of whoppers posted to ACG, but this is the biggest of them all, and I'm frankly shocked that no one took it up. For that the lot of you should be deeply ashamed of yourselves.



          I didn't know that Alexander Hamilton was Jewish. Didn't know that about JP Morgan, either. Charles E Mitchell? Edmund Converse? David Rockefeller? Benjamin Strong? William Porter? Percy Johnson? Herbert Twitchell? George L Harrison? Jamie Dimon? Not a Jew in the bunch. The Federal Reserve's chairman wasn't Jewish until 1930, 26 years after the Fed's founding, and wouldn't boast another Jew in the top spot until 1970.

          I've worked in financial services for a long time now. I started out on Wall Street back when it was really The Street. Back then the only firm with Jewish leadership was Goldman Sachs, and they were a limited partnership back then, not a joint stock corporation like they are today. The firm I started at in the '90s was so WASP that they imported Englishmen from South Africa, fer cryin' out loud: not a single Jew held an upper-echelon executive officer position. Most of the major houses on The Street were like that. That reality alone gives lie to the tripe that "Jews created our central banking system and still control it to this day." They didn't create it, and they don't exert any kind of disproportionate control. Jews play alongside everybody else in the sandbox, that's all.



          Yeah, French monarchs have always been good for gussying up their repudiation of debt with some kind of moral blather. In 1307 Phillip IV ordered all Templars in France arrested, opening the arrest warrant with "God is not pleased. We have enemies of the faith in the kingdom."



          Then again, Philip the Fair had experience with that kind of thing: the year before he expelled France's Jews -- to whom he owed vast sums, as well, and subsequently expropriated their property to his exchequer. Given Bonaparte's noted belligerence, I've got to suspect that his attitudes towards bankers -- like Thos Jefferson's -- were influenced by his level of indebtedness.



          Nearly a century-and-a-half before Israel's founding, how could a person raised as a Lutheran be viewed as a Jew? Sonofabitch came of age before the advent of modern Zionism.



          "Natural inhabitants," Gracie? The only region of the earth to which Homo sapiens is indigenous is the East Africa Rift Valley. Everywhere else, we're all interlopers -- Jew and Goy alike.



          On the one hand you're absolving Africans from responsibility for their enslavement, but on the other you're holding Jews responsible for their persecution. I fail to understand the rationale for this dichotomy.



          How did they abuse what they never had?



          You mean like invaders? Jews formed a Jew army and conquered territories in Europe and oppressed the inhabitants?



          Naturally, being a Shylock. Of course, such suspicions never fall on a JP Morgan or a Jamie Dimon or a David Rockefeller: two WASPs and a Greek.



          You mean like SEIU Local 1199 does? Martin Luther King's "favorite union"? When was the last time they had Jewish leadership -- the 1940s?

          If you're going to level that accusation against Soros, then logically you have to level it against all who've done the same -- and that's a pretty long list.



          Found your margarine.



          Same isle as the tin foil hats.



          As soon as you produce some facts, then we'll be talking history. Until then, you're just talking trash -- old, tired, trash.

          Now how is it that no other ACG picked up on his Alfred Rosenberg-style of antisemitism? There's not a line in his posts that wasn't lifted whole from propaganda of the past, starting with The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, and ending with Goebbels' Titanic. All he's done is copy-and-paste -- and you chumps missed it. How?
          I did notice that, but I thought it spoke for itself. I was arguing that liberals don't like Israel because they're antisemitic, and TacitKill J. proved me right.
          "It is a fine fox chase, my boys"

          "It is well that war is so terrible-we would grow too fond of it"

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
            If we're not talking about policing then it's on Israel to fight their own battles.

            Israel already has nukes which is what prompted Iran. What else would you expect.

            You can hardly blame Iran for wanting nukes after all those times the Israeli leaders threatened to destroy Tehran.
            Oh wait, never mind.
            Avatar is General Gerard, courtesy of Zouave.

            Churchill to Chamberlain: you had a choice between war and dishonor. You chose dishonor, and you will have war.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by American87 View Post
              I did notice that, but I thought it spoke for itself.
              I got on you earlier in this thread because you used "old tyme" antisemitic tropes in defense of Israel: that irony made me laugh. TactiKill J. used those themes as they were originally intended. In this day and age, I was frankly stunned that anyone not named David Duke would go that route. I actually had to read his post several times just to assure myself that I wasn't hallucinating. And I'm still rather shocked that no one took him up on it. In another thread I was accused of harboring antisemitic sentiments for merely pointing out that JDL is classified as a terrorist organization by the FBI. What's posted above is genuine, classic, antisemitism. The difference between the two should be plain to even the dullest mind.

              Originally posted by American87 View Post
              I was arguing that liberals don't like Israel because they're antisemitic, and TacitKill J. proved me right.
              I have some theories about that myself. Attitudes among US liberals towards Israel began to turn noticeably in the early 1980s. Before that Israel was looked upon as a model of modern socialism. One of my high school history teachers -- himself Jewish -- posited that Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 1982 and the subsequent Sabra refugee massacre flipped views about Israel 180° overnight: before the invasion Israel was the little guy standing tall against all the Arab bullies -- after Israel was the bully throwing her weight around against poor little Lebanon and the long-suffering stateless Palestinians. It's certainly a plausible theory: after all, being the underdog has always had its charms, and its advantages. I mean, who ever rooted for Goliath, right.

              Another theory, offered by self-described "Red Diaper Baby," and now a devotee of kabbalah Joshua Muravchik is that when kibbutzim, Israel's founding utopian collective communes, started breaking up in the early '80s, progressive-liberals in the US and elsewhere took that as an affront, a repudiation of shared socialistic aspirations, and therefore their views of Israel began to dim. Truth be told, as wacky as I find Muravshik, I've know more than a few lefties who took the dissolution of the kibbutzim personally, and they've been implacably hostile towards Israel ever since.
              I was married for two ******* years! Hell would be like Club Med! - Sam Kinison

              Comment

              Latest Topics

              Collapse

              Working...
              X