Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bill Clinton faces new sexual assault accusations

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 101combatvet
    replied
    Total BS as usual. Which false allegations? The ones they paid people off to keep from testifying? You can't make this stuff up.

    Originally posted by BF69 View Post
    He & his wife have also been the subject of more false allegations than almost anyone in US history, so the 'weight of allegation' argument cuts both ways in this case (if there aren't already some on this thread then wait a few hours). The false outweigh the true by a very, very large margin.

    There is also a useful point to be made about people who attack & denigrate women making allegations against one person and then a short time later insist that allegations against another be believed simply because one shares their politics & another does not.

    There is ample evidence that points toward him being a sexual predator. I'm perfectly happy for him to get whatever comeuppance is waiting for him.

    Leave a comment:


  • 101combatvet
    replied
    It would be a first and I can't wait.

    Originally posted by Pruitt View Post
    Does the Secret Service have to still guard him if he is sent to prison?

    Pruitt

    Leave a comment:


  • Pruitt
    replied
    Does the Secret Service have to still guard him if he is sent to prison?

    Pruitt

    Leave a comment:


  • BF69
    replied
    Originally posted by phil74501 View Post
    C'mon...it's Bill Clinton. Considering his extensive and confirmed history, in that regard, would anyone seriously doubt any allegations of that sort that are made against him? The only surprising thing should be that there aren't more.
    He & his wife have also been the subject of more false allegations than almost anyone in US history, so the 'weight of allegation' argument cuts both ways in this case (if there aren't already some on this thread then wait a few hours). The false outweigh the true by a very, very large margin.

    There is also a useful point to be made about people who attack & denigrate women making allegations against one person and then a short time later insist that allegations against another be believed simply because one shares their politics & another does not.

    There is ample evidence that points toward him being a sexual predator. I'm perfectly happy for him to get whatever comeuppance is waiting for him.

    Leave a comment:


  • phil74501
    replied
    Originally posted by 101combatvet View Post
    Well, there was that beautiful and promising High School cheerleader that he had lured to a party. Got her stoned on cocain and raped her. She was last known to be an addict working the streets. The Clintons are such warm and friendly people, ask any Democrat.
    Also don't forget that these are the same people...the Clintons...who had private detectives going around digging up dirt on the women Bill had hooked up with, so they could either blackmail them into staying quiet, or smear them should they come forward or be outed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hida Akechi
    replied
    Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
    Doesn't matter. He will never be charged, let alone tried or convicted. When people said "justice is blind" they meant it quite literally.
    This. /\ "Blind justice", especially when it comes to liberal, and any other, demagogues.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mountain Man
    replied
    Doesn't matter. He will never be charged, let alone tried or convicted. When people said "justice is blind" they meant it quite literally.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hida Akechi
    replied
    Sheesh. They're coming out of the woodwork in droves now, aren't they?

    Whether he did this or not (keeping in mind that he's done it to other women), this is still not proof until it is proven.

    Leave a comment:


  • 101combatvet
    replied
    Well, there was that beautiful and promising High School cheerleader that he had lured to a party. Got her stoned on cocain and raped her. She was last known to be an addict working the streets. The Clintons are such warm and friendly people, ask any Democrat.

    Originally posted by phil74501 View Post
    C'mon...it's Bill Clinton. Considering his extensive and confirmed history, in that regard, would anyone seriously doubt any allegations of that sort that are made against him? The only surprising thing should be that there aren't more.

    Leave a comment:


  • 101combatvet
    replied
    Democrats love criminals.

    Originally posted by Cambronnne View Post
    Power is always attractive.
    I feel the need to defend Monica, because she was the most innocent and sincere person involved in that entire scandal.
    She got destroyed for being attracted to and seduced by a man who had made a living out of doing such things.
    Clinton was been defended and celebrated for 20 years and Monica became a punch line

    Leave a comment:


  • phil74501
    replied
    Originally posted by Rutger View Post
    Well, to quote from many past threads:

    - "not guilty until proven, and convicted in court."
    But that one seems to be forgotten when convenient.

    additionally:
    - "the double standard."
    - "I said sorry to my family".
    - "It's very easy for todays promiscuous women to make false claims".
    - "it's very difficult for a man to defend himself against allegations of this nature".

    etc. etc.
    C'mon...it's Bill Clinton. Considering his extensive and confirmed history, in that regard, would anyone seriously doubt any allegations of that sort that are made against him? The only surprising thing should be that there aren't more.

    Leave a comment:


  • wolfhnd
    replied
    My wife is one of those women that doesn't just believe someone because they have a vagina when it comes to sexual misconduct. We got in an argument over it because I said that considering how people like Hillary never seem to end up in jail all we have left is to ruin their reputation. Innocent until proven guilty only works if there is some chance that the rich and famous will be found guilty.

    It is like we have gone back to the stage of social development where lords could rape peasants. The elite in our society may be the most technically educated people in history but they are not sophisticated in their understanding of social organization.

    At least some of the problem is size. The sheer number of people makes it easy to be a tree that goes unnoticed in the forest. It also dissolves the since of obligations that exist in smaller communities and eliminates shame as a deterrent. The problem is magnified by social economic segregation. While the rich and lower classes never lived together they lived in close proximity to each other. They went to the same church, attended the same public functions, read the same novels, fought the same wars.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cambronnne
    replied
    Originally posted by Pruitt View Post
    Bill Clinton had such a bad reputation for chasing women that any woman (even in her late teens) would be crazy to get on a plane with him called the Flying [email protected] Still a certain type of young woman like Monica Lewinski would be attracted. Still we are talking about consenting adults, aren't we?

    Pruitt
    Power is always attractive.
    I feel the need to defend Monica, because she was the most innocent and sincere person involved in that entire scandal.
    She got destroyed for being attracted to and seduced by a man who had made a living out of doing such things.
    Clinton was been defended and celebrated for 20 years and Monica became a punch line

    Leave a comment:


  • Rutger
    replied
    Well, to quote from many past threads:

    - "not guilty until proven, and convicted in court."
    But that one seems to be forgotten when convenient.

    additionally:
    - "the double standard."
    - "I said sorry to my family".
    - "It's very easy for todays promiscuous women to make false claims".
    - "it's very difficult for a man to defend himself against allegations of this nature".

    etc. etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • BELGRAVE
    replied
    Originally posted by Pruitt View Post
    Bill Clinton had such a bad reputation for chasing women that any woman (even in her late teens) would be crazy to get on a plane with him called the Flying [email protected] Still a certain type of young woman like Monica Lewinski would be attracted. Still we are talking about consenting adults, aren't we?

    Pruitt
    Surely that's the point. If they were consenting adults then why would it matter ?
    And if they weren't why wait until now to make allegations ?

    Leave a comment:

Latest Topics

Collapse

Working...
X