Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

White man accused of killing 2 blacks had Hitler speech

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • sebfrench76
    replied
    Dear mr Jackson , 20 miles away from my house , in June 40, 6 Senegalese Riflemen had their throats cut by REGULAR SOLDIERS FROM THE HONORABLE ERWIN ROMMEL'S DIVISIONS..
    Indeed a very innovative way to prove a tolerance for black people.

    Leave a comment:


  • sebfrench76
    replied
    Originally posted by Half Pint John View Post
    But he isn't a racist.
    Of course he's not!
    He has some Sydney Bechett records.

    Leave a comment:


  • Half Pint John
    replied
    Originally posted by sebfrench76 View Post
    You should be happy ,no?
    So why complaining?Less blacks , less crime , no?
    At least ,following your logic , the one that you post here on a daily basis.
    But he isn't a racist.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sergio
    replied
    Originally posted by Stonewall_Jack View Post
    Hitler was not against blacks according to numerous testimonies. And not only this, the greatest evidence is in the German leaflets dropped on allies during WW2. One would have never came across a German leaflet urging Jewish Americans to surrender to the Germans, we all know how the Reich felt about Jews. But certainly Hitler and the Reich wanted to make an appeal to pretty much all non Jewish whites and even black folks.

    Specifically wrt blacks Hitler was said by the great Jesse Owens to congratulate Ownes open winning numerous medals at the 1936 Olympics. And yet today their is some movie out there Holly-wooding the 1936 Olympics showing that Owens was discriminated in Germany during the 36 Olympics. IDK if this is meant to sell tickets or its meant for some moral reasoning, but there is never a need to stretch the truth to paint the Reich as the bad guys, most people know the Reich were the bad guys.

    Here is one of the leaflets the Germans dropped on allied forces during WW2 this one specifically meant to reach out to African Americans telling African Americans why fight for a racist country, surrender to Germany where you will be treated well.





    The point is that the white man as described in the OP... if he killed the blacks because he felt Hitler wanted him to, the white man would have actually been going against what Hitler wanted. Either way Hitler does not need to be painted as having more enemies then he did, most of the world stands against any form of bigotry we dont need to make up the enemies of the Third Reich it gets away imo from the plight that the innocent civilians faced from the Reich. Its kinda like trying to say Irishman had it just as bad as black folks in 19th century USA. In fact there are to this day numerous black leaders whom admire Hitler. So in ending, point is that the Reich was not against blacks at least not in the sense that some think they were, and that the allies of ww2 were the good guys.
    Congratulations on making one of the dumbest posts ever seen on this site, and believe me that takes some doing. Even by your standards this is a steaming pile of excrement.

    RACISM, REVISIONISM & GENOCIDE/MASS MURDER
    Racist Remarks, Racial Slurs, Nazi Revisionism, purposeful Revisionist History contrary to known or certain facts, or any commentary calling for the indiscriminate mass murder or genocide of any group based on race, religion, nationality, sexual preference or political beliefs will not be tolerated on the Armchair General (ACG) Forums.

    Needless to say, these have no place at a serious historical forum, although we may allow them in certain circumstances as case studies of how history can be manipulated by ignorance.
    Last edited by Sergio; 24 Sep 17, 04:20.

    Leave a comment:


  • sebfrench76
    replied
    Originally posted by Moulin View Post
    there have been a whopping 77 murders by white extremists --since 1995
    http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slate...ince_1995.html
    blacks murder over 3000 blacks per year
    You should be happy ,no?
    So why complaining?Less blacks , less crime , no?
    At least ,following your logic , the one that you post here on a daily basis.

    Leave a comment:


  • 101combatvet
    replied
    Like having Farrakhan literature, same ****.

    Originally posted by pamak View Post
    JUST...

    Leave a comment:


  • pamak
    replied
    Originally posted by Skoblin View Post
    Well, just having a copy of a Hitler speech doesn't make one a Nazi anymore than having a copy of an Ayn Rand book doesn't make one a moron.
    JUST...

    Leave a comment:


  • Mountain Man
    replied
    Originally posted by Moulin View Post
    blacks commit hate crimes at twice the rate of whites
    murder at over SEVEN times the rate
    Which means that they must also be terrorists.

    The definition of a "terrorist", however, is one who uses random acts of violence in order to achieve some sort of change. Murdering two people, despite the races involved, does not make the white guy a "terrorist" unless he has a specific agenda...remove all blacks from America, for example.

    Having a speech by Hitler, while interesting, means absolutely nothing until someone proves that he was acting on the specific basis of that speech. In the meantime, both Discovery and AHC are running constant documentaries featuring Hitler, his ideology, and his speeches, meaning that millions of Americans are exposed to that stuff routinely, but we aren't doing anything murderous as a result.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gixxer86g
    replied
    Originally posted by Stonewall_Jack View Post
    Hitler was not against blacks according to numerous testimonies. And not only this, the greatest evidence is in the German leaflets dropped on allies during WW2. One would have never came across a German leaflet urging Jewish Americans to surrender to the Germans, we all know how the Reich felt about Jews. But certainly Hitler and the Reich wanted to make an appeal to pretty much all non Jewish whites and even black folks.

    Specifically wrt blacks Hitler was said by the great Jesse Owens to congratulate Ownes open winning numerous medals at the 1936 Olympics. And yet today their is some movie out there Holly-wooding the 1936 Olympics showing that Owens was discriminated in Germany during the 36 Olympics. IDK if this is meant to sell tickets or its meant for some moral reasoning, but there is never a need to stretch the truth to paint the Reich as the bad guys, most people know the Reich were the bad guys.

    Here is one of the leaflets the Germans dropped on allied forces during WW2 this one specifically meant to reach out to African Americans telling African Americans why fighting for a racist country, surrender to Germany where you will be treated well.






    The point is that the white man as described in the OP... if he killed the blacks because he felt Hitler wanted him to, the white man would have actually been going against what Hitler wanted. Either way Hitler does not need to be painted as having more enemies then he did, most of the world stands against any form of bigotry we dont need to make up the enemies of the Third Reich it gets away imo from the plight that the innocent civilians faced from the Reich. Its kinda like trying to say Irishman had it just as bad as black folks in 19th century USA. In fact there are to this day numerous black leaders whom admire Hitler. So in ending, point is that the Reich was not against blacks at least not in the sense that some think they were, and that the allies of ww2 were the good guys.
    This is one of the most batshit insane things I've ever read.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moulin
    replied
    there have been a whopping 77 murders by white extremists --since 1995
    http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slate...ince_1995.html
    blacks murder over 3000 blacks per year

    Leave a comment:


  • Moulin
    replied
    blacks commit hate crimes at twice the rate of whites
    murder at over SEVEN times the rate

    Leave a comment:


  • Stonewall_Jack
    replied
    Hitler was not against blacks according to numerous testimonies. And not only this, the greatest evidence is in the German leaflets dropped on allies during WW2. One would have never came across a German leaflet urging Jewish Americans to surrender to the Germans, we all know how the Reich felt about Jews. But certainly Hitler and the Reich wanted to make an appeal to pretty much all non Jewish whites and even black folks.

    Specifically wrt blacks Hitler was said by the great Jesse Owens to congratulate Ownes open winning numerous medals at the 1936 Olympics. And yet today their is some movie out there Holly-wooding the 1936 Olympics showing that Owens was discriminated in Germany during the 36 Olympics. IDK if this is meant to sell tickets or its meant for some moral reasoning, but there is never a need to stretch the truth to paint the Reich as the bad guys, most people know the Reich were the bad guys.

    Here is one of the leaflets the Germans dropped on allied forces during WW2 this one specifically meant to reach out to African Americans telling African Americans why fight for a racist country, surrender to Germany where you will be treated well.





    The point is that the white man as described in the OP... if he killed the blacks because he felt Hitler wanted him to, the white man would have actually been going against what Hitler wanted. Either way Hitler does not need to be painted as having more enemies then he did, most of the world stands against any form of bigotry we dont need to make up the enemies of the Third Reich it gets away imo from the plight that the innocent civilians faced from the Reich. Its kinda like trying to say Irishman had it just as bad as black folks in 19th century USA. In fact there are to this day numerous black leaders whom admire Hitler. So in ending, point is that the Reich was not against blacks at least not in the sense that some think they were, and that the allies of ww2 were the good guys.
    Last edited by Stonewall_Jack; 23 Sep 17, 08:04. Reason: added link

    Leave a comment:


  • Skoblin
    replied
    Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
    Given all the evidence we know so far, it's certainly a very high possibility that it was racially motivated.
    All I am suggesting is that people should wait until all the facts are presented and are done so by persons who are willing to append their name to them.

    Leave a comment:


  • 101combatvet
    replied
    Is it any worse than black terror? Have you even bothered to look at the crime, rape, and murder that blacks are engaged in on a daily basis? It seems so unsafe for all those white terrorists when black terror gangs are targeting them.

    Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
    The entire country does well in defending white terrorist.

    Leave a comment:


  • wolfhnd
    replied
    Yes, there are racist who commit domestic terror. The KKK being a good example. White supremacists and Nazis certainly create an environment that facilitates racial violence. There is nothing new about these facts. The question is if law enforcement is doing everything they can to prevent these problems.

    What people want you to address TactiKill is how many of these incidents could be addressed if resources were not absorbed by black crime. It's unfortunate but resources are limited and have to be prioritized.

    The question I have is if people such as the one in the OP would simply direct their hatred to another group if their indoctrination was different.

    Leave a comment:

Latest Topics

Collapse

Working...
X