Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More Democrat criminal, questionable, and scandalous behavior

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • More Democrat criminal, questionable, and scandalous behavior

    Seems the Susan Rice thing with unmasking hasn't gone away either...

    http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politi...cid=spartandhp

    Former national security adviser Susan Rice privately told House investigators that she unmasked the identities of senior Trump officials to understand why the crown prince of the United Arab Emirates was in New York late last year, multiple sources told CNN.

    The New York meeting preceded a separate effort by the UAE to facilitate a back-channel communication between Russia and the incoming Trump White House.
    But, there's the secret squirrel meetings to explain...

    But the Trump Tower meeting came shortly before the UAE brokered a meeting to open lines of communications with the United States and Russia, with a clandestine January meeting in the Seychelles Islands in the Indian Ocean, according to reports in CNN and The Washington Post. That meeting is now under investigation on Capitol Hill, though it's unclear whether Rice mentioned the Seychelles meeting in the testimony.
    But, the real reason is clear even with the thin veneer of lies from above:

    But Rice's suggestion that she unmasked the names of US individuals -- who turned out to be Trump associates -- over concerns about the propriety of the crown prince's visit to the United States could help her fend off attacks that she was out of line in the actions she took.
    Rep. Trey Gowdy, a South Carolina Republican who is helping lead the House investigation, told the Daily Caller "nothing that came up in her interview that led me to conclude" that she improperly unmasked the names of Trump associates or leaked it to the press.
    Want to bet this goes nowhere compared to the Trump-Russia 18+ months of drivel?

  • #2
    You understand that she 'requested' the unmasking and the the actual decision is NOT hers, but the NSA's? Unless it meets their guidelines for unmasking it does not happen.
    “The time has come,” the Walrus said,
    “To talk of many things:
    Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
    Of cabbages—and kings—
    And why the sea is boiling hot—
    And whether pigs have wings.”
    ― Lewis Carroll

    Comment


    • #3
      I always wonder how people put their faith in their government. Hint its made up with people and people are flawed. Shall we agree that the government officials have their own biases? That they all have special interests and concerns? Are they not just like you and I?

      Does the name Lois Lerner ring a bell?

      Unfortunately some of these people are willing to break the law to push their agenda...
      Credo quia absurdum.


      Quantum mechanics describes nature as absurd from the point of view of common sense. And yet it fully agrees with experiment. So I hope you can accept nature as She is - absurd! - Richard Feynman

      Comment


      • #4
        What law did Ms Rice break?
        “The time has come,” the Walrus said,
        “To talk of many things:
        Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
        Of cabbages—and kings—
        And why the sea is boiling hot—
        And whether pigs have wings.”
        ― Lewis Carroll

        Comment


        • #5
          https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2005/10/17/157477/-

          Yea, yea yea...just the demmies.
          "Ask not what your country can do for you"

          Left wing, Right Wing same bird that they are killing.

          you’re entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Half Pint John View Post

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
              What law did Ms Rice break?
              “The time has come,” the Walrus said,
              “To talk of many things:
              Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
              Of cabbages—and kings—
              And why the sea is boiling hot—
              And whether pigs have wings.”
              ― Lewis Carroll

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Combat Engineer View Post
                What law did Ms Rice break?
                Most likely section 702 of the FISA act by leaking the names to the media. There's good evidence she was the source.

                If that was done for political purposes she also violated the Logan Act that prohibits government employees from using their position for political purposes.

                There's at least as much credibility to her having done this as there is to the Trump-Russia investigation...

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
                  Most likely section 702 of the FISA act by leaking the names to the media. There's good evidence she was the source.

                  If that was done for political purposes she also violated the Logan Act that prohibits government employees from using their position for political purposes.

                  There's at least as much credibility to her having done this as there is to the Trump-Russia investigation...
                  What evidence?

                  Logan act is unenforceable. No one will ever be charged under it.
                  “The time has come,” the Walrus said,
                  “To talk of many things:
                  Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
                  Of cabbages—and kings—
                  And why the sea is boiling hot—
                  And whether pigs have wings.”
                  ― Lewis Carroll

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Combat Engineer View Post
                    What evidence?
                    She has admitted she requested the unmasking. Her claim was it was for legitimate purposes. However, the unmasked names, etc., ended up in the media via a leak. I'd say that's a pretty good start on evidence she was the source.

                    Logan act is unenforceable. No one will ever be charged under it.
                    Maybe. But, there are those saying Flynn should be prosecuted under it... It is enforceable however, it just hasn't been. The likelihood is she wouldn't be, and neither will Flynn.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
                      She has admitted she requested the unmasking. Her claim was it was for legitimate purposes. However, the unmasked names, etc., ended up in the media via a leak. I'd say that's a pretty good start on evidence she was the source.



                      Maybe. But, there are those saying Flynn should be prosecuted under it... It is enforceable however, it just hasn't been. The likelihood is she wouldn't be, and neither will Flynn.
                      So, no evidence, just conjecture on your part. Got it. I think you misunderstand the word evidence, by a lot.
                      “The time has come,” the Walrus said,
                      “To talk of many things:
                      Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
                      Of cabbages—and kings—
                      And why the sea is boiling hot—
                      And whether pigs have wings.”
                      ― Lewis Carroll

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Combat Engineer View Post
                        What evidence?

                        Logan act is unenforceable. No one will ever be charged under it.
                        But it's still a law on the books.
                        Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                          But it's still a law on the books.
                          An uninforcable one. Sure. Plus its immaterial unless she released the info, which TAG can't even post a bit of evidence.
                          “The time has come,” the Walrus said,
                          “To talk of many things:
                          Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
                          Of cabbages—and kings—
                          And why the sea is boiling hot—
                          And whether pigs have wings.”
                          ― Lewis Carroll

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Combat Engineer View Post
                            So, no evidence, just conjecture on your part. Got it. I think you misunderstand the word evidence, by a lot.
                            It's more than Mueller has on Trump - Russia and that got a special prosecutor...

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
                              It's more than Mueller has on Trump - Russia and that got a special prosecutor...
                              More conjecture. You have no idea what Mr Mueller has. Admit it.
                              “The time has come,” the Walrus said,
                              “To talk of many things:
                              Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
                              Of cabbages—and kings—
                              And why the sea is boiling hot—
                              And whether pigs have wings.”
                              ― Lewis Carroll

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              Working...
                              X