Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Political Circus in full swing...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Political Circus in full swing...

    Former U.S. attorney Preet Bharara is a perfect example of a political clown, or perhaps more appropriately described as one if the Circus ring master.
    He skillfully uses language intended to purposely mislead the audience and build suspense and expectations, before the little car load of clowns puts on the show.
    Here are a few of his misleading and inflammatory one liners which are nothing more than political double speaks.

    I think there's absolutely evidence to begin a case -- I think it's very important for all sorts of armchair speculators in the law, to be clear that no one knows right now whether there is a provable case of obstruction," he said on ABC's "This Week."

    It's also true...that there's no basis to say there's no obstruction."

    Whether or not that is impeachable or that's indictable, that's a very serious thing and I'm not sure that people fully get that the standard is not just whether something is a crime or not," Bharara said.

    He said there is a lot to be "frightened" and "outraged" about.
    Basically he is saying there is nothing here, the investigation must therefore continue!
    What I'm frightened and outraged about is that we have real issues and problems that need to be addressed and what is consuming DC? And friggen side show!

    http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politi...9IB?li=BBnb7Kz
    Last edited by Urban hermit; 11 Jun 17, 17:38.
    Dispite our best intentions, the system is dysfunctional that intelligence failure is guaranteed.
    Russ Travers, CIA analyst, 2001

  • #2
    To state that there should be an investigation, then state "there's no basis to say there's no obstruction" sounds to me like guilty until proven innocent.

    Comment


    • #3
      He deserves his diploma...

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
        He deserves his diploma...

        Dispite our best intentions, the system is dysfunctional that intelligence failure is guaranteed.
        Russ Travers, CIA analyst, 2001

        Comment


        • #5
          Do they really want to keep going THERE?

          Did or did not Hillary Clinton sign off on allowing a Russian agency to purchase a company holding up to 20 percent of America’s uranium production capacity?

          Who leaked the classified information that started this ball rolling? For the investigation to be valid, that has to come out.


          Did or did not Hillary Clinton, by using an unsecured server and allowing Huma Abedin to email copies to her husband, Anthony Weiner, expose classified documents?

          Was there collusion between the Obama administration and the IRS to disallow tax free status to conservative organizations?

          If not, why did Lois Lerner plead the Fifth Amendment and retire with full benefits?
          "Why is the Rum gone?"

          -Captain Jack

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by The Exorcist View Post
            Did or did not Hillary Clinton sign off on allowing a Russian agency to purchase a company holding up to 20 percent of America’s uranium production capacity?

            Who leaked the classified information that started this ball rolling? For the investigation to be valid, that has to come out.


            Did or did not Hillary Clinton, by using an unsecured server and allowing Huma Abedin to email copies to her husband, Anthony Weiner, expose classified documents?

            Was there collusion between the Obama administration and the IRS to disallow tax free status to conservative organizations?

            If not, why did Lois Lerner plead the Fifth Amendment and retire with full benefits?
            Excellent post! You asked the $64,000.00 question.
            Dispite our best intentions, the system is dysfunctional that intelligence failure is guaranteed.
            Russ Travers, CIA analyst, 2001

            Comment


            • #7
              And over in ring 3...

              The "Trump tapes" apparently don't exist...

              http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politi...cid=spartandhp

              WASHINGTON — If President Trump did secretly record his private White House meetings, he didn't enlist the Secret Service to help.

              The agency responded to a Freedom of Information Act request from the Wall Street Journal for any tapes that may exist by saying they didn't have any audio recordings or transcripts of any tapes.
              That means if he did record his meetings, they're covered by executive privilege, in a similar manner that Comey's notes of meetings were.

              Another dead end in the Most Overhyped Snowstorm... EVER!

              Comment

              Latest Topics

              Collapse

              Working...
              X