Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Republican Candidate Assaults Reporter

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Admiral View Post
    It's trespassing to enter into any persons private office uninvited & to remain when told to leave > 1st & foremost!

    Nobody has any legal right to trespass & accost somebody like this in their own office

    If somebody trespasses on my property, they won't be happy about it long unless they leave while they're still breathing & that IS the law, too!

    Montana is little different than Texas in that regard.

    I couldn't give a rip for either of them, but the fact remains, the 1st idjut was criminally trespassing from the start & the 2nd idjut didn't drop the 1st fools well weathered citizens arrested punk arse at the laws feet & file charges 1st.

    In that this was about politics, both idjuts can wear it all as they left it.

    Save your line of 'who's excusin who', mate couldn't care even slightly less...

    IOW, sux to get your arse beat for invading the privacy of another on their own turf & it sux to be a politician with a freely invited TV crew there & then not finish the ordeal proper.

    Dumbasses > both of them!


    I already corrected several assumptions made in your post about allegations of trespassing using the original article and statement by witnesses. Refer to it if this is in reply to my own post.

    Clearly telling someone you will meet with them later and then you will have an underling meet with them are not demands to leave or allegations of trespassing. So the rest of your rant rests on unfirm ground when defending a politician who attacked a reporter.

    Even more telling is the man's own admission of wrongdoing and apology. No claims of trespassing, just the defense of a "liberal" reporter aggressively questioning him.
    First Counsul Maleketh of Jonov

    Comment


    • #62
      You miss my point entirely...

      That was the politicians stupid arse failing from the word, GO... and even after his first failing, simply demanding the fool leave at any point after is the point at which all things are in his court, not the intruders. The politician was a fool on all counts, the reporter was a trespasser once he was told to essentially leave by any means & he did not comply but remained aggressively in pursuit of what he came for. You don't get to keep cramming a recorder into somebodies face in their own office once told to leave & make other arrangements, or even not.

      Anybody does that to me (I seek no office, thus political considerations are moot, no apology needed) will not be allowed to stay after barging into my personal office space from the 1st instance > I say when somebody leaves or remains, no questions about it. No matter when I say.

      So, why you so stuck on peeps supposedly "defending" this git or that, nobody really cares, here. It ain't like it's the mark of the devil or anything.

      Pretty pointless IMO, beyond the finger wagin it appears to be.

      Just because ya say it of me or anybody else, don't make it so.


      On the Plains of Hesitation lie the blackened bones of countless millions who, at the dawn of victory, sat down to rest-and resting... died. Adlai E. Stevenson

      ACG History Today

      BoRG

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Delenda estRoma View Post

        Even more telling is the man's own admission of wrongdoing and apology. ..
        Which means it was exactly the wrong thing to do.
        Never admit anything, not when your enemy is a media unified in its hatred of everyone and everything not controlled by the Left.


        Fact; the Dems thought they would win every special election that dame after Trump's historic victory, they hoped for a backlash that would mirror their own anti-Trump Propaganda and hysteria.
        They have lost every single one so far.


        When all is said and done, it is results that count.
        "Why is the Rum gone?"

        -Captain Jack

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Admiral View Post
          You miss my point entirely...

          That was the politicians stupid arse failing from the word, GO... and even after his first failing, simply demanding the fool leave at any point after is the point at which all things are in his court, not the intruders. The politician was a fool on all counts, the reporter was a trespasser once he was told to essentially leave by any means & he did not comply but remained aggressively in pursuit of what he came for. You don't get to keep cramming a recorder into somebodies face in their own office once told to leave & make other arrangements, or even not.

          Anybody does that to me (I seek no office, thus political considerations are moot, no apology needed) will not be allowed to stay after barging into my personal office space from the 1st instance > I say when somebody leaves or remains, no questions about it. No matter when I say.

          So, why you so stuck on peeps supposedly "defending" this git or that, nobody really cares, here. It ain't like it's the mark of the devil or anything.

          Pretty pointless IMO, beyond the finger wagin it appears to be.

          Just because ya say it of me or anybody else, don't make it so.


          Politics don't matter in this situation.

          A man assaulted another who had not made any violent move toward him whatsoever in front of neutral witnesses who didn't even know the identity of the reporter. He was apparently told he would be briefed later twice, but persisted and was violently assaulted.

          Blaming a reporter for a violent politician who simply could have asked the man to leave or called police to do so is ridiculous.

          You're pushing some weird point that doesn't make sense. Are you saying it's fine to assault anyone who enters your office without express permission? Because the initial response to the reporter were not demands to leave, but placating. This does not seem to be a case of trespassing at all and I see no one claiming as much outside this thread.
          First Counsul Maleketh of Jonov

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by The Exorcist View Post
            Which means it was exactly the wrong thing to do.
            Never admit anything, not when your enemy is a media unified in its hatred of everyone and everything not controlled by the Left.


            Fact; the Dems thought they would win every special election that dame after Trump's historic victory, they hoped for a backlash that would mirror their own anti-Trump Propaganda and hysteria.
            They have lost every single one so far.


            When all is said and done, it is results that count.
            So you're happy a hot head who committed a crime was just elected?
            First Counsul Maleketh of Jonov

            Comment


            • #66
              Delenda estRoma:

              A question... What do you think about the Green Party?

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
                Delenda estRoma:

                A question... What do you think about the Green Party?
                Seems totally unconnected to the topic. Start another thread and I'll reply.
                First Counsul Maleketh of Jonov

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Delenda estRoma View Post
                  Seems totally unconnected to the topic. Start another thread and I'll reply.
                  It is connected. I wouldn't have asked if it wasn't.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
                    It is connected.
                    Not at all. Start another thread and I'll answer. My statements here have nothing to do with political parties.
                    First Counsul Maleketh of Jonov

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Delenda estRoma View Post
                      Not at all. Start another thread and I'll answer. My statements here have nothing to do with political parties.
                      Fine, be obtuse.

                      My question was asked because I wanted to see your opinion of that party untainted by the following:

                      Cynthia McKinney, when she was in Congress physically assaulted a Capitol Police officer in the performance of his duties. It was by almost every account unprovoked. She was charged with a felony but it was later dropped. She claimed rather vociferously that it was all about her race and gender. That ended when she saw her poll ratings at home plummet. Her home district went to the polls and voted her out of office in the next election cycle.

                      She then ran for President on the Green Party ticket. She still offers crazy lady explanations on YouTube for the incident.

                      Do you think someone like that should be a candidate for President?

                      The reason I ask is your posts sound like you're judge and jury on this incident and have no desire to see the outcome of the charge in court.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        TAG, in this example we have neutral witnesses, a recording, and video evidence along with an apology and admission of guilt by the guilty party. The man's behavior would likely get him fired at any establishment but political office. Party matters not at all.
                        First Counsul Maleketh of Jonov

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Delenda estRoma View Post
                          Politics don't matter in this situation.

                          A man assaulted another who had not made any violent move toward him whatsoever in front of neutral witnesses who didn't even know the identity of the reporter. He was apparently told he would be briefed later twice, but persisted and was violently assaulted.

                          Blaming a reporter for a violent politician who simply could have asked the man to leave or called police to do so is ridiculous.

                          You're pushing some weird point that doesn't make sense. Are you saying it's fine to assault anyone who enters your office without express permission? Because the initial response to the reporter were not demands to leave, but placating. This does not seem to be a case of trespassing at all and I see no one claiming as much outside this thread.

                          So you agree that Al Franken doesn't deserve to be a USA Senator nor does "North Carolina Congressman Bob Etheridge" deserve to serve. ??? !!!

                          Or are you just partisian to Democrats beaking the laws and rules of Guv'mint while only the GOP is punished for same ???

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by G David Bock View Post
                            So you agree that Al Franken doesn't deserve to be a USA Senator nor does "North Carolina Congressman Bob Etheridge" deserve to serve. ??? !!!

                            Or are you just partisian to Democrats beaking the laws and rules of Guv'mint while only the GOP is punished for same ???
                            Deflections and red herrings are things I generally don't respond to.
                            First Counsul Maleketh of Jonov

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by Delenda estRoma View Post
                              So you're happy a hot head who committed a crime was just elected?
                              I am thrilled that the lackey of that foreign Socialist rag got what he deserved. In fact, but disrupting another media outlet's interview and jamming his clammy hand into that man's face, he should have got worse.

                              I am very happy that the voters of Montana aren't the fainting Goats that voters in other parts of the world are, and they can see through what this foreign operative was trying to do there.

                              Face it, there is a reason why Dentists and even Congressmen are more popular than reporters today.
                              "Why is the Rum gone?"

                              -Captain Jack

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                If this guy weren't running for oriface he would have pressed charges... politics has everything to do with it... instead, he apologized profusely & still got elected.

                                Now THAT is a scumbag!

                                Didn't see that comin, now, did ya, mate...

                                And if it weren't for politics, we wouldn't even be talkin about it!

                                🐝
                                On the Plains of Hesitation lie the blackened bones of countless millions who, at the dawn of victory, sat down to rest-and resting... died. Adlai E. Stevenson

                                ACG History Today

                                BoRG

                                Comment

                                Latest Topics

                                Collapse

                                Working...
                                X