Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

another illegal alien admits to voting fraud

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    From the horse's mouth

    NHYD Statement Calling on Governor Sununu to Denounce False Claims of Voter Fraud
    February 12, 2017
    NHYD Statement Calling on Governor Sununu to Denounce False Claims of Voter Fraud

    Concord, NH - In response to comments made by President Trump's senior policy advisor Stephen Miller that further fueled the baseless and dangerous claims of massive voter fraud in New Hampshire and Governor Sununu's refusal to denounce these heinous claims, State Representative and Election Law committee member Will Pearson (D-Keene) released the following statement:

    "By sitting silently as the Trump Administration continues to perpetuate false and dangerous claims of massive voter fraud here in New Hampshire, Governor Sununu is allowing serious damage to our state's proud electoral tradition and is setting a dangerous precedent," said Representative Pearson.

    "It is no secret that these flagrant lies about voter fraud are attempts to lay the ground work for restrictive laws, like the 40 bills filed this session in Concord that roll back voting rights and target young voters. If Governor Sununu wants to preserve the integrity of elections here in the Granite State then he needs to stand up and unequivocally denounce these lies. Anything short is an affront to our open democracy, runs contrary to New Hampshire's 'First in the Nation' status, and will hurt our state's ability to attract and retain young people," concluded Pearson.
    https://www.nhyd.org/single-post/201...of-Voter-Fraud
    Dispite our best intentions, the system is dysfunctional that intelligence failure is guaranteed.
    Russ Travers, CIA analyst, 2001

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Urban hermit View Post
      I can keep this up all week CE, ready to say "uncle"?

      http://www.philly.com/philly/news/po...officials.html

      Trump falsely claims that millions voted illegally, costing him the popular vote



      http://www.latimes.com/nation/politi...htmlstory.html

      It's sad that you don't realize that your are proving me correct. Sorry, put you're just not understanding the point.
      “The time has come,” the Walrus said,
      “To talk of many things:
      Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
      Of cabbages—and kings—
      And why the sea is boiling hot—
      And whether pigs have wings.”
      ― Lewis Carroll

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Urban hermit View Post
        Still proving my point. Once again thanks.
        “The time has come,” the Walrus said,
        “To talk of many things:
        Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
        Of cabbages—and kings—
        And why the sea is boiling hot—
        And whether pigs have wings.”
        ― Lewis Carroll

        Comment


        • #19
          Okay... Outraged...

          First, it defined.

          out·rage
          [ˈoutˌrāj]

          VERB
          arouse fierce anger, shock, or indignation in (someone):
          "he was outraged at this attempt to take his victory away from him"
          synonyms: enrage · infuriate · incense · anger · scandalize · offend · [more]
          violate or infringe flagrantly (a principle, law, etc.):
          "their behavior outraged all civilized standards"
          This article tells of Democrats suing over trying to make sure voting is legal.

          http://www.reuters.com/article/us-us...-idUSKBN12V28G

          Democrats are fighting for every immigrant who feels threatened by Donald Trump’s election. We will not stand by and watch families be torn apart — Democrats in Congress and in states and cities across the country are already standing up to Trump’s hatred and bigotry to defend their immigrant neighbors.*
          https://www.democrats.org/issues/immigration-reform

          Sounds like outrage to me.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
            Okay... Outraged...

            First, it defined.



            This article tells of Democrats suing over trying to make sure voting is legal.

            http://www.reuters.com/article/us-us...-idUSKBN12V28G


            https://www.democrats.org/issues/immigration-reform

            Sounds like outrage to me.
            Filing a law suit is not really outrage. It's really the opposite.
            “The time has come,” the Walrus said,
            “To talk of many things:
            Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
            Of cabbages—and kings—
            And why the sea is boiling hot—
            And whether pigs have wings.”
            ― Lewis Carroll

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
              Okay... Outraged...

              First, it defined.



              This article tells of Democrats suing over trying to make sure voting is legal.

              http://www.reuters.com/article/us-us...-idUSKBN12V28G


              https://www.democrats.org/issues/immigration-reform

              Sounds like outrage to me.
              CE will never admit he is wrong. We know outraged when we see it, we saw the mad dogs on The View and MSNBC and CNN frothing at the mouth when Trump said there were illegal immigrants voting and voting fraud.
              But we also know that those illegal voters are the cornerstone of the democrat party voting block.
              That is one wall they love.
              Dispite our best intentions, the system is dysfunctional that intelligence failure is guaranteed.
              Russ Travers, CIA analyst, 2001

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Combat Engineer View Post
                Filing a law suit is not really outrage. It's really the opposite.
                You could split the hair that grows on a bowling ball.
                Dispite our best intentions, the system is dysfunctional that intelligence failure is guaranteed.
                Russ Travers, CIA analyst, 2001

                Comment


                • #23
                  Inside Hillary Clinton’s Outrage Machine, Allies Push the Buttons

                  Just before 9:30 p.m. on Sept. 13, the first Twitter post appeared, directing users to an obscure article about a remark Donald J. Trump had made last year that 50 percent of the country did not want to work.

                  Over the next 48 hours, 1,819 people, seemingly furious that the news media had paid more attention to Hillary Clinton’s assertion that half of Trump supporters fit into a “basket of deplorables,” lashed out at reporters and news outlets.

                  “Dear Media: If you don’t cover this, you’re covering for him, #Trump50percent,” wrote one Twitter user.

                  “@CNN @CNNPolitics have been in bed with #Trump for a year! They refuse to report #TrumpScandals #Trump50percent” wrote another.
                  By the end of the week, the hashtag #Trump50percent had appeared in Twitter timelines more than 30,000 times.

                  Other liberal Twitter users, some of them with more than a million followers, linked to the article and spread the same complaint the Clinton campaign had made: that a shameful false equivalence was causing the media to soft-pedal Mr. Trump’s many transgressions and overplay the few it could find on Mrs. Clinton.

                  At first glance, the Clintonian grass roots seemed to have organically sprouted in anger. But closer inspection yielded traces of Miracle-Gro that led to the sixth floor of a building in the Flatiron neighborhood of Manhattan.

                  There, surrounded by start-up tech companies, “Star Wars” posters and flat-screen televisions fixed on cable news, Peter Daou sat with his team at a long wooden table last week, pushing the buttons that activate Mrs. Clinton’s outrage machine. Mr. Daou’s operation, called Shareblue, had published the article on Mr. Trump’s comment on its website and created the accompanying hashtag.

                  “They will put that pressure right on the media outlets in a very intense way,” Mr. Daou, the chief executive of Shareblue, said of the Twitter army he had galvanized. “By the thousands.”

                  In the sprawling Clinton body politic, Shareblue is the finger that wags at the mainstream news media (“R.I.P. Political Journalism (1440-2016)”) or pokes at individual reporters. It is a minor appendage, but in an increasingly close race for the presidency, it plays its part.

                  And it is already warming up for the biggest event of the general election so far: the first debate, on Monday night. It has already published a piece calling on moderators to fact-check Mr. Trump on the spot, and will continue through debate night, whipping up support online with the hashtag #DemandFairDebates.

                  Shareblue is owned by David Brock, the onetime Clinton critic who remade himself into a Clinton supporter and architect of a conglomerate of organizations designed, he said, to be the liberal answer to the conservative messaging of Fox News.

                  The Brock network includes his Media Matters for America watchdog website; two pro-Clinton “super PACs,” the opposition research outfit American Bridge and the pro-Clinton fact-checking and reporter-spamming operation Correct the Record; and Shareblue, which filled the need, Mr. Brock said, for a progressive outlet that spoke directly to the grass roots and which “was avidly and unabashedly pro-Hillary.”

                  Shareblue’s bread-and-butter content is exposing what it considers to be news coverage stacked against Mrs. Clinton. Mr. Daou was particularly excited about a project seeking to show that Mrs. Clinton’s email travails had been in the news every day since the story originally broke in March 2015.

                  Often, their editorial direction seems in sync with the Clinton campaign, which has instructed its surrogates to blame news coverage for negative press. “Are they going to hold Hillary to a different standard again?” read one recent “talking points” memo sent by the campaign to its surrogates.

                  That approach became clear this month. On Sept. 1, The Washington Post broke a story about the Donald J. Trump Foundation being fined for improperly donating $25,000 to Pam Bondi, the attorney general of Florida, around the time that her office was deciding whether to investigate fraud allegations against Trump University.

                  The next day, the Clinton campaign put out a statement contending that while the news media had an unhealthy obsession with the Clinton Foundation, Mr. Trump’s charity had been caught in an “actual pay-to-play scandal.” The Clinton campaign’s foreign policy spokesman, Jesse Lehrich, wrote on Twitter: “Awaiting outrage.”

                  He didn’t have to wait long. Mr. Daou and his website incessantly demanded coverage of the Trump Foundation story. “We just have to start the fire,” Mr. Daou said in an interview last week. Many liberal columnists, Democratic operatives and members of the Media Matters family reached the same conclusion, excoriating news outlets and individuals for grading Mr. Trump “on a curve.”

                  Whether it truly cleared the air about Mr. Trump’s foundation or merely muddied the water about Mrs. Clinton’s, Mr. Daou took credit for injecting the notion of false equivalence into the social media bloodstream and for forcing some news outlets to adjust their coverage..
                  https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/23/u...vid-brock.html
                  Dispite our best intentions, the system is dysfunctional that intelligence failure is guaranteed.
                  Russ Travers, CIA analyst, 2001

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Combat Engineer View Post
                    Thanks once again for proving my point.

                    Right because the Dem’s are likely to find evidence that there were 3-4million illegal votes cast for them.
                    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedy. -- Ernest Benn

                    Comment

                    Latest Topics

                    Collapse

                    Working...
                    X