Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"WikiLeaks figure says ‘disgusted’ Democrat leaked Clinton campaign emails"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Bwaha View Post
    He's dead. Shot in the back. But that's the way that the clintons roll.
    Correction, Suicide with 2 bullets to the back of the head with a revolver that still has all cylinders loaded.

    Comment


    • #17
      ^^^ ... Most interesting ...

      TANSTAAFL = There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch

      Comment


      • #18
        And Trump is Hitler?
        We hunt the hunters

        Comment


        • #19
          Please petition congress to protect whistleblowers.
          We hunt the hunters

          Comment


          • #20
            of course we have to assume Assange is telling the Truth.

            I am assuming Assange is receiving some blow back from his supporters.

            I assume they are not big supporters of Putin or Trump. Being perceived to be in bed with them is not a good Assange within his circle

            Just food for thought

            Comment


            • #21
              Made up news thread of the week. Thanks.
              “The time has come,” the Walrus said,
              “To talk of many things:
              Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
              Of cabbages—and kings—
              And why the sea is boiling hot—
              And whether pigs have wings.”
              ― Lewis Carroll

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by The Doctor View Post
                By Dave Boyer - The Washington Times - Wednesday, December 14, 2016

                A WikiLeaks figure is claiming that he received leaked Clinton campaign emails from a “disgusted” Democratic whistleblower, while the White House continued to blame Russian hackers Wednesday for meddling in the presidential election and asserted that Donald Trump was “obviously aware” of Moscow’s efforts on his behalf.

                Craig Murray, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, said in the report by the Daily Mail that he flew to Washington for a clandestine handoff with one of the email sources in September.

                He said he received a package in a wooded area near American University.

                “Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,” Mr. Murray told the British newspaper. “The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.”

                WikiLeaks published thousands of emails stolen from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, providing a steady stream of negative news coverage of the Democratic presidential nominee during the final weeks of the campaign. Mr. Murray said the leakers were motivated by “disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.”

                The Daily Mail report noted that Mr. Murray was removed from his diplomatic post amid allegations of misconduct.

                [...]

                Meanwhile on Wednesday, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence had to cancel a closed-door classified briefing on the issue of suspected Russian interference after U.S. intelligence agencies refused to cooperate.

                Rep. Devin Nunes, California Republican and committee chairman, requested that the FBI, CIA, Office of the Director of National Intelligence and National Security Agency provide witnesses, in part in response to reports last week in The Washington Post and The New York Times that intelligence agencies think the Kremlin deliberately tried to push the election to Mr. Trump, something not supported by postelection testimony to the panel.

                But according to Fox News, “agencies refused to provide representatives for the session.”


                “It is unacceptable that the Intelligence Community directors would not fulfill the House Intelligence Committee’s request to be briefed tomorrow on the cyber-attacks that occurred during the presidential campaign,” Mr. Nunes said in a statement. “The Committee is deeply concerned that intransigence in sharing intelligence with Congress can enable the manipulation of intelligence for political purposes.”

                Kellyanne Conway, Mr. Trump’s campaign manager, accused people within intelligence agencies of trying to undermine the U.S. election results to curry favor with liberal media and are now ducking accountability.

                “We should all be very concerned about that,” she said in an appearance on Fox News Channel.


                [...]

                http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...linton-campai/
                Of course... It's inconceivable that Wikileaks is telling the truth, while the Democrats and lamestream media are lying...
                Is it not foolish to think of wikileaks as anything more than another news outlet? Why does everyone seem to trust them with out question? Foolishness.
                "Ask not what your country can do for you"

                Left wing, Right Wing same bird that they are killing.

                you’re entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Combat Engineer View Post
                  Made up news thread of the week. Thanks.
                  Governments don't cover up horrendous crimes?

                  http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...-cover-up.html

                  Wake up and take a look at how Obama has persecuted whistleblowers and used the IRS to intimidate people. Powerful people like to be in control.
                  We hunt the hunters

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    WikiLeaks has a pretty good record of vetting sources but that doesn't mean that you should just accept anything they publish. They are definitely not a "fake" news outlet and if there is a bias it would have to be in what they don't release.

                    None of the Clinton releases have been challenged as inaccurate and the "fake" news narrative comes with very few actual names so people can check them out for themselves. It would be totally illogical to assume anything other than that Obama is diverting attention away from his failed policies and incompetence in dealing with the Russians and his administrations incompetent internal security.

                    Historians are going to look back and laugh at the people who bought into the Russians did it and fake news narrative.
                    We hunt the hunters

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Half Pint John View Post
                      Is it not foolish to think of wikileaks as anything more than another news outlet? Why does everyone seem to trust them with out question? Foolishness.
                      WikiLeaks is just as much of a fake news outlet as the Washington Post.

                      We know the DNC was hacked with Russian malware.

                      We know WikiLeaks published DNC emails.

                      Everything in between is fake news.
                      Watts Up With That? | The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change.

                      Comment

                      Latest Topics

                      Collapse

                      Working...
                      X