Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trump's war on crime, let's do this

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Arnold J Rimmer
    replied
    Originally posted by ljadw View Post
    Legalization does not mean that the drug cartels would make less billions: they still would have the monopoly and would continue fixing prices .

    There would be not less drugs sold if drugs were legalized .
    Nor would addicts quit stealing to serve their habits.

    Legalization of pot has certainly empowered the cartels.

    Leave a comment:


  • TactiKill J.
    replied
    Originally posted by TacCovert4 View Post
    It's the poor that typically do user/dealer sort of things.

    Your affluent users buy dope, use dope. Their only occasions to get caught are in the initial purchase, and the transporting of a personal use quantity of dope (many times a misdemeanor) home.....the law prevents the kicking of random doors to find dope.

    Your poor users often can't afford to support their habit. This leads them to get caught while shoplifting, burglarizing, prostituting, and other sorts of crimes. They also get caught while doing favors for their dealers like muling dope, or performing street level sales of their own to pay for their habit. They're far more likely to be caught with felony levels of dope.
    Yes, so what I initially said was accurate. Everyone uses, but the poor are the ones being caught most often.

    Of course dealers don't want to take the effort of doing what's right to get and maintain a well paying job, that's why they're out dealing drugs. Anyone could become qualified for anything if the desire is there. Creating more jobs is not going to change that. Also, good luck getting these guys that only speak ebonics english a good job regardless of the circumstances.

    Anyone else notice how there's a new ebonics word being created almost every month. Soon enough it will have to recognized as its own language. How about learning standard English before creating your own ghetto dialect.
    Last edited by TactiKill J.; 13 Dec 16, 15:26.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bwaha
    replied
    I think that ending sanctuary cities is a necessity, if you order LE to ignore illegals you just empower them to break further laws.

    Leave a comment:


  • TacCovert4
    replied
    Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
    Jobs won't do anything in this regard. The type of people dealing drugs are typically unqualified for any well paying job to begin with. So it would be extremely naive to expect them to give up 6 figures a year dealing drugs to work for minimum wage instead. Won't happen.

    You're quite mistaken on this on two counts. 1) The type that turns to dealing drugs CAN become qualified for a well paying job. They choose not to. And 2) Only the top tier of drug traffickers make 6 figures a year. The vast majority of your street level dealers can maintain themselves somewhere around or just above the poverty line with dealing.....many of them improve their lifestyle to working class by abusing the Welfare system.

    Also, drugs are used by the poor and affluent alike, it's the poor that typically get caught and punished though.
    It's the poor that typically do user/dealer sort of things.

    Your affluent users buy dope, use dope. Their only occasions to get caught are in the initial purchase, and the transporting of a personal use quantity of dope (many times a misdemeanor) home.....the law prevents the kicking of random doors to find dope.

    Your poor users often can't afford to support their habit. This leads them to get caught while shoplifting, burglarizing, prostituting, and other sorts of crimes. They also get caught while doing favors for their dealers like muling dope, or performing street level sales of their own to pay for their habit. They're far more likely to be caught with felony levels of dope.

    Leave a comment:


  • TactiKill J.
    replied
    Originally posted by ljadw View Post
    Legalization does not mean that the drug cartels would make less billions: they still would have the monopoly and would continue fixing prices .

    There would be not less drugs sold if drugs were legalized .
    It's impossible to completely eliminate anything, but they will most certainly make less. This is a given and already proven by the few states that have legalized marijuana. If you're a law abiding citizen why would you go buy weed from dangerous gang members when you no longer have to...

    Leave a comment:


  • ljadw
    replied
    Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
    Some form of legalization should definitely be part of the solution. The Mexican drug cartels make billions in drug trade ($6b according to RAND), how would cutting that much from them not have a significant impact on their operations?

    As long as there is money to be made more will be recruited in. It has to be a two-pronged approach.

    Legalization does not mean that the drug cartels would make less billions: they still would have the monopoly and would continue fixing prices .

    There would be not less drugs sold if drugs were legalized .

    Leave a comment:


  • Bass_Man86
    replied
    Originally posted by Bwaha View Post
    You guys are forgetting the three hundred pound gorilla.

    What do these people do for money? Sell drugs. If you took them out you'd just get another gang coming in to take their place.

    Perhaps we should rethink the 'war on drugs'. I'm not saying total legalization for everything, but what we're doing now is and has been a total failure...
    Completely agree for a change!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Urban hermit
    replied
    Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
    Some form of legalization should definitely be part of the solution. The Mexican drug cartels make billions in drug trade ($6b according to RAND), how would cutting that much from them not have a significant impact on their operations?

    As long as there is money to be made more will be recruited in. It has to be a two-pronged approach.
    THen why not just negotiate with the drug cartels to buy drugs at market price and then destroy the drugs?

    Leave a comment:


  • andrewza
    replied
    Originally posted by Bwaha View Post
    You guys are forgetting the three hundred pound gorilla.

    What do these people do for money? Sell drugs. If you took them out you'd just get another gang coming in to take their place.

    Perhaps we should rethink the 'war on drugs'. I'm not saying total legalization for everything, but what we're doing now is and has been a total failure...
    Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
    Some form of legalization should definitely be part of the solution. The Mexican drug cartels make billions in drug trade ($6b according to RAND), how would cutting that much from them not have a significant impact on their operations?

    As long as there is money to be made more will be recruited in. It has to be a two-pronged approach.
    How would making it legal cut of the catals money?

    Leave a comment:


  • TactiKill J.
    replied
    Originally posted by Arnold J Rimmer View Post
    I keep hearing this 'hold his feet to the fire' comment.

    What fire? We haven't been able to do that with Bobo.

    The simple fact is that these problems have been building for decades, and no one action will stop them.

    You want to impact crime in a meaningful way, create private sector jobs.

    Drug use will drop, crime of all sorts will recede slowly.

    Drug use thrives in the dysfunctional portions of society, as does other crime. As the pool of people raised without hope grows, crime grows, and no amount of enforcement or legalization or criminalization will impact that in any significant way.

    Tere is no quick fix. Even if the jobs flood in tomorrow, it will be years before we see an impact. It will most certainly get worse; if jobs are created it might get better with time.
    Jobs won't do anything in this regard. The type of people dealing drugs are typically unqualified for any well paying job to begin with. So it would be extremely naive to expect them to give up 6 figures a year dealing drugs to work for minimum wage instead. Won't happen.

    Also, drugs are used by the poor and affluent alike, it's the poor that typically get caught and punished though.

    Leave a comment:


  • TactiKill J.
    replied
    Originally posted by Bwaha View Post
    You guys are forgetting the three hundred pound gorilla.

    What do these people do for money? Sell drugs. If you took them out you'd just get another gang coming in to take their place.

    Perhaps we should rethink the 'war on drugs'. I'm not saying total legalization for everything, but what we're doing now is and has been a total failure...
    Some form of legalization should definitely be part of the solution. The Mexican drug cartels make billions in drug trade ($6b according to RAND), how would cutting that much from them not have a significant impact on their operations?

    As long as there is money to be made more will be recruited in. It has to be a two-pronged approach.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arnold J Rimmer
    replied
    Originally posted by The Exorcist View Post
    Well, let's hold his feet to the fire, then.

    Ignoring everything every wrong done by Politician with the right Letter next to his name is what the OTHER guys do.
    I keep hearing this 'hold his feet to the fire' comment.

    What fire? We haven't been able to do that with Bobo.

    The simple fact is that these problems have been building for decades, and no one action will stop them.

    You want to impact crime in a meaningful way, create private sector jobs.

    Drug use will drop, crime of all sorts will recede slowly.

    Drug use thrives in the dysfunctional portions of society, as does other crime. As the pool of people raised without hope grows, crime grows, and no amount of enforcement or legalization or criminalization will impact that in any significant way.

    Tere is no quick fix. Even if the jobs flood in tomorrow, it will be years before we see an impact. It will most certainly get worse; if jobs are created it might get better with time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arnold J Rimmer
    replied
    Originally posted by andrewza View Post
    MS13 is a third word gang in a first world country. Sure people will replace them but they wont be near the same level of vilonce.
    Getting rid of them is extremely tough under a POTUS who favors illegals over citizens.

    Leave a comment:


  • andrewza
    replied
    Originally posted by Bwaha View Post
    You guys are forgetting the three hundred pound gorilla.

    What do these people do for money? Sell drugs. If you took them out you'd just get another gang coming in to take their place.

    Perhaps we should rethink the 'war on drugs'. I'm not saying total legalization for everything, but what we're doing now is and has been a total failure...
    MS13 is a third word gang in a first world country. Sure people will replace them but they wont be near the same level of vilonce.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gixxer86g
    replied
    Originally posted by The Doctor View Post


    Love it!

    Leave a comment:

Latest Topics

Collapse

Working...
X