Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Portland being destroyed by Pro-Hillary Rioters

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Exorcist
    replied
    Originally posted by Daemon of Decay View Post
    ...
    That's because these are also just college kids and not the hard-core professional protesters. You know, the kind that show up to a WTO meeting with well-worn gasmasks and a stash of molotovs ready to go.
    True. Every paid professional can drag a dozen or more radicals right along with them, that's why they get paid the big bucks. They are good at starting fights, but when the going gets tough they are already long gone.

    Its there an anti-Terrorist statute that covers this, or are they all focused solely on Grandmas with nail-clippers at the Airport?

    Leave a comment:


  • Daemon of Decay
    replied
    Originally posted by asterix View Post
    I realize it will seem strange to read this, but be grateful that is all you have to deal with. I watched them on the telly last night, and I must say, they are pathetic. In Europe, we have the them and they are call themselves Anti-Fa (anti-fascist). A sort of crypto-Marxist-anarchist blend, part wanting to let anything and everything happen without consequence...as long as it conforms to their liking.
    Sums up a lot of the far-left in a nutshell. Like here, people love to abuse political labels to suit their needs (see how many Republicans consider Democrats to be socialists), which is doubly-harsh when it is people adopting a label wrongly for themselves, rather than having it erroneously forced upon them by outsiders.

    More to the point, they can be particularly violent and brutal when they are organized, and they know their actions are many times given the blind eye by the elite, political Left.

    On a personal matter, a few years ago during a visit to Paris, one such Anti-fa tried to began to shove my sister because she is a hot-shot financial officer at the firm she works for. We were on a bus and I was there. When he touched my sister I KO'd the guy with a single punch to the face. The bus driver had a bottle of water and we woke the guy and left him dazed on a park bench as we in the bus drove off.

    It was one of the most satisfying days in my entire life. I'm not one to advocate violence, but when it becomes physical, all rules are out. ESPECIALLY when it involves one of my little sisters.

    But yeah, these Oregon "protestors" have nothing on Anti-fa brutes.[/QUOTE]

    That's because these are also just college kids and not the hard-core professional protesters. You know, the kind that show up to a WTO meeting with well-worn gasmasks and a stash of molotovs ready to go.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arnold J Rimmer
    replied
    Originally posted by The Exorcist View Post
    They were the first people the Bolsheviks went after. Within months of taking power, they had killed thousands.
    Just another entry under 'Sometimes bad people do good things' list.

    Leave a comment:


  • asterix
    replied
    Originally posted by Daemon of Decay View Post
    I hate how these leftists call themselves anarchists because it sounds sexy. I remember a while ago when I saw "anarchists" protesting cuts in social spending. I didn't know whether to laugh or curse.

    They give real anarchists a bad name.

    I realize it will seem strange to read this, but be grateful that is all you have to deal with. I watched them on the telly last night, and I must say, they are pathetic. In Europe, we have the them and they are call themselves Anti-Fa (anti-fascist). A sort of crypto-Marxist-anarchist blend, part wanting to let anything and everything happen without consequence...as long as it conforms to their liking.

    More to the point, they can be particularly violent and brutal when they are organized, and they know their actions are many times given the blind eye by the elite, political Left.

    On a personal matter, a few years ago during a visit to Paris, one such Anti-fa tried to began to shove my sister because she is a hot-shot financial officer at the firm she works for. We were on a bus and I was there. When he touched my sister I KO'd the guy with a single punch to the face. The bus driver had a bottle of water and we woke the guy and left him dazed on a park bench as we in the bus drove off.

    It was one of the most satisfying days in my entire life. I'm not one to advocate violence, but when it becomes physical, all rules are out. ESPECIALLY when it involves one of my little sisters.

    But yeah, these Oregon "protestors" have nothing on Anti-fa brutes.

    Leave a comment:


  • T. A. Gardner
    replied
    Originally posted by Daemon of Decay View Post
    Which is a trip. Anarchists want a stateless society. Communists want a "stateless" society where the party becomes the new state. The latter are like those who think the best way to reduce the murder rate is to rename murder "angry hugs".
    Well, that's how much of the dialogue on the Left is to begin with:

    Compassion: Feeling good about yourself for wanting to give away money you didn’t earn to people you hope will vote for your side.

    “Conscience of the Senate”: KKK member.

    Flag: Something to be burned and walked on at protests or alternately, waved close to election time.

    Greed: Wanting to keep money you’ve earned instead of having it spent on Bridges to Nowhere and government loans to people who’ve contributed to Obama’s campaign.

    Guns: Vicious weapons that force people to kill each other.

    He’s in the pocket of big oil: He was once seen filling up the tank of his car with gas.

    Jesus: Someone who shouldn’t ever be brought up in schools, other government buildings, or politics in general unless you’re claiming he was really a liberal who’d be in favor of gay marriage and abortion.

    Minorities: People who are too dumb and incompetent to make it without liberal help.

    Morals: Things you should avoid having so you can’t be accused of hypocrisy if you don’t live up to your own standards.

    No justice, no peace: Give us money and we’ll find someone else to bother.

    Our opponents refuse to compromise on this issue: The Republicans refuse to do everything we want.

    Racism
    : A word you cry when you’re losing an argument with a conservative.

    Reality-based community: People who believe that Communism could work if the right people were in charge and that George W. Bush was behind 9/11 — or the Jews, either/or.

    Taxes: A limitless supply of free money to be given away to liberal special interests in return for votes.

    Tolerance:
    Something that justifies going on hate-filled rants against people who don’t share your view of the world.

    That charge is outrageous: That charge is true, but it’s embarrassing that you brought it up in public.

    Unfair attack: They quoted me.
    http://rightwingnews.com/john-hawkin...speak-liberal/

    Or, this rather extensive Leftist to English dictionary...

    http://www.akdart.com/libspeak.html

    Leave a comment:


  • Daemon of Decay
    replied
    Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    They are anarchists of a sort... Communist anarchists. That is they want to force revolution so they can impose a Communist dictatorship of virtue on the nation.

    No, they aren't true anarchists of the "Nobody tells me what I can do" sort. Instead, they're really the revolutionaries that want political power so they can impose their will on the masses.
    Which is a trip. Anarchists want a stateless society. Communists want a "stateless" society where the party becomes the new state. The latter are like those who think the best way to reduce the murder rate is to rename murder "angry hugs".

    Leave a comment:


  • Daemon of Decay
    replied
    Originally posted by Arnold J Rimmer View Post
    How could anarchists have anything but a bad name?
    They really couldn't, considering how the statists control the education, the media, and the history books.

    Oh, and the ice cream parlors.

    Leave a comment:


  • T. A. Gardner
    replied
    Originally posted by Daemon of Decay View Post
    I hate how these leftists call themselves anarchists because it sounds sexy. I remember a while ago when I saw "anarchists" protesting cuts in social spending. I didn't know whether to laugh or curse.

    They give real anarchists a bad name.
    They are anarchists of a sort... Communist anarchists. That is they want to force revolution so they can impose a Communist dictatorship of virtue on the nation.

    No, they aren't true anarchists of the "Nobody tells me what I can do" sort. Instead, they're really the revolutionaries that want political power so they can impose their will on the masses.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Exorcist
    replied
    Originally posted by Arnold J Rimmer View Post
    How could anarchists have anything but a bad name?
    They were the first people the Bolsheviks went after. Within months of taking power, they had killed thousands.
    At least... that's what the Govt SAID they were.

    Leave a comment:


  • johns624
    replied
    While I don't condone in the least what these idiots are doing, aren't some of the people on here condemning them the same ones who a few months ago were saying that there was going to be a revolution if Hillary was elected?

    Leave a comment:


  • Gixxer86g
    replied
    Originally posted by Trailboss49 View Post
    These riots across America are by no means spontaneous. They are orchestrated. So who is behind it? Would you believe George Soros? You know, the dude who hired the Ferguson rioters.
    Good to see you back, Pat!

    Leave a comment:


  • Arnold J Rimmer
    replied
    Originally posted by Daemon of Decay View Post

    They give real anarchists a bad name.
    How could anarchists have anything but a bad name?
    Last edited by Arnold J Rimmer; 12 Nov 16, 14:53.

    Leave a comment:


  • Daemon of Decay
    replied
    Originally posted by Trailboss49 View Post
    These riots across America are by no means spontaneous. They are orchestrated. So who is behind it? Would you believe George Soros? You know, the dude who hired the Ferguson rioters.
    Originally posted by TacCovert4 View Post
    I agree. I'm just waiting for the judge to issue the warrant against Soros for sedition.
    If I may, how much of these protests can be laid at his feet?

    I'm trying to look at it more academically than just "he's guilty by being a primary financier" sort of angle. Is it that he's the root cause - they wouldn't ever have happened without him - or is he just a benefactor towards peoples and smaller groups whom he wants to encourage and payroll to some degree?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bwaha
    replied
    Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
    So at what point do we go after the heart of the problem. Sheep will continue to act as such, but if we address the people herding them then maybe things will change.
    Yes. We should go after Soros with a class action lawsuit for every window broken and every injured person. We should sue him out of existence. Seize his remaining assets as well so he can do no more harm to us or anyone else...

    Leave a comment:


  • TacCovert4
    replied
    Originally posted by TactiKill J. View Post
    So at what point do we go after the heart of the problem. Sheep will continue to act as such, but if we address the people herding them then maybe things will change.
    I agree. I'm just waiting for the judge to issue the warrant against Soros for sedition.

    Leave a comment:

Latest Topics

Collapse

Working...
X