Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Open letter to Mr Khan

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Open letter to Mr Khan

    Dear Mr. Khan,

    I want to preface this letter by stating that I respect your son’s sacrifice for this great nation. By all accounts, he is a true hero that sacrificed himself in service to our country. For that I am thankful.

    As a veteran, I watched your comments at the Democratic National Convention with a mixture of sadness, and anger. The United States has a military comprised of volunteers. Every single member has made the conscious choice to join the military and serve. There is not a single service member who has been forced into service. It is important for all service members (and apparently, their families) to understand that service to this great nation does not imbue one with special privileges or rights. I found your comments troubling when you said: “Have you ever been to Arlington cemetery? Go look at the graves of brave patriots who died defending the United States of America. You will see all faiths, genders and ethnicities. You have sacrificed nothing and no one.”

    http://100percentfedup.com/wow-us-ma...tion-mr-obama/
    My worst jump story:
    My 13th jump was on the 13th day of the month, aircraft number 013.
    As recorded on my DA Form 1307 Individual Jump Log.
    No lie.

    ~
    "Everything looks all right. Have a good jump, eh."
    -2 Commando Jumpmaster

  • #2
    This one needs a bump......
    ALL LIVES SPLATTER!

    BLACK JEEPS MATTER!

    BLACK MOTORCYCLES MATTER!

    Comment


    • #3
      EXCERPT:
      ...
      In order to shut down a debate they're losing, Democrats find victims to make their arguments for them, pre-empting counter-argument by droning on about the suffering of their victim-spokesperson. Alternative opinions must be preceded by proof that the speaker has "sacrificed" more than someone who lost a child, a husband, or whatever.

      Khan's argument, delivered angrily and in a thick Pakistani accent at the DNC, is that "our" Constitution requires us to continue the nonstop importation of Muslims.

      If the U.S. Constitution required us to admit more than 100,000 Muslims a year -- as we do -- we'd already be living in Pakistan, and Khan wouldn't have had to move to get that nice feeling of home. So the "argument" part of Khan's point is gibberish.

      Luckily, Khan had Part Two: His son died in Iraq, whereas Donald Trump does not have a son who died in Iraq, so he can't say anything.

      Yes, a candidate for president of the United States is supposed to be prohibited from discussing a dangerous immigration program because Khan's son was one of fourteen (14!) Muslim servicemen killed by other Muslims in our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. That's why we're obligated to import yet more Muslims – including, undoubtedly, some just like the ones who killed his son. Q.E.D.!

      If you think that doesn't make any sense, keep your yap shut, unless you lost a child in Iraq, too.

      There were virtually no Muslims in America before Teddy Kennedy's 1965 immigration act. Today, we admit more immigrants from Muslim countries than from Great Britain.

      Are Americans allowed to have an opinion on whether that's a good idea?

      So far, it's worked out great!

      In addition to the sudden appearance of honor killings, clitorectomies, hijabs and massive government frauds, Muslim immigrants have given us: The most devastating terrorist attack in world history, followed by terrorist attacks at Fort Hood, the Boston Marathon, a military recruiting center in Chattanooga, Times Square, Vaughan Foods in Oklahoma, San Bernardino and an Orlando nightclub, among other places.

      We've admitted 2 million Muslims just since 9/11 – that’s more than had been admitted before 9/11. If we don't make it 3 million, we're monsters? May we ask how many Muslims Khan's mystery Constitution requires -- or is that out of bounds unless we had a child who died in Iraq?

      Apparently, sending out a victim to make their argument was the only option left for the "Make America Muslim!" crowd.
      ...
      http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2016-08-03.html

      Comment


      • #4
        delivered angrily and in a thick Pakistani accent
        Oh yes, that is so important. Good thing we don't hear anything from ole Henry with his even thicker German accent, but he was a war hawk Repub. Different for sure
        "Ask not what your country can do for you"

        Left wing, Right Wing same bird that they are killing.

        you’re entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by G David Bock View Post
          Today, we admit more immigrants from Muslim countries than from Great Britain.

          http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2016-08-03.html

          Britain is a relatively small country compared to the billion plus Muslims in the world.

          Don't really get that point?

          Rest of the article seems to have a lot of falsehoods

          http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/imm...mirage-n477306

          Comment


          • #6
            I'll use a Trump tactic, attack the source and do so while denying I'm doing it.

            Good old Adams Apple Ann Coulter. Now I AM not saying she has one, I'm just saying that SOME people have said that. Me? I don't know, but some people have said that......

            End Trump attack.
            “The time has come,” the Walrus said,
            “To talk of many things:
            Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
            Of cabbages—and kings—
            And why the sea is boiling hot—
            And whether pigs have wings.”
            ― Lewis Carroll

            Comment


            • #7
              Khizr Khan Believes the Constitution ‘Must Always Be Subordinated to the Sharia’
              http://www.breitbart.com/national-se...tution-sharia/

              Comment


              • #8
                So Mr. Khans argument point is basically this, we shouldn't have a debate or issue over immigration limits or procedures because his son, a muslim was killed ( by muslims by the way) while in service to our nation. So unless somebody has a son or daughter that was killed we cant say anything. Sorry that's not how our country works, Mr. Khan.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Mystikeye View Post
                  So Mr. Khans argument point is basically this, we shouldn't have a debate or issue over immigration limits or procedures because his son, a muslim was killed ( by muslims by the way) while in service to our nation. So unless somebody has a son or daughter that was killed we cant say anything. Sorry that's not how our country works, Mr. Khan.
                  It is not that at all.....

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Mystikeye View Post
                    So Mr. Khans argument point is basically this, we shouldn't have a debate or issue over immigration limits or procedures because his son, a muslim was killed ( by muslims by the way) while in service to our nation. So unless somebody has a son or daughter that was killed we cant say anything. Sorry that's not how our country works, Mr. Khan.
                    He doesn't understand that because he's not an American.
                    ALL LIVES SPLATTER!

                    BLACK JEEPS MATTER!

                    BLACK MOTORCYCLES MATTER!

                    Comment

                    Latest Topics

                    Collapse

                    Working...
                    X