Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Iran warns the US: Stay away from our red lines

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Iran warns the US: Stay away from our red lines

    Obama has really goofed things up...

    There used to be a time when the Islamic Republic showed some discretion with regards to its regional hegemonic and ideological ambitions, as well as breaching international laws. At least the ruling clerics of Iran were more covert about these issues.

    But not anymore.

    Iranís discretion was limited to the period before the nuclear deal was reached between P5+1 and the Islamic Republic, and before President Obama began pursuing appeasement policies with the ruling clerics.

    Currently, Iranís blatant aggression and provocative attitude has reached an unprecedented level, ranging from launching ballistic missiles in the middle of the day, to publicly supporting Bashar Al Assad, militarily and financially, and galvanizing the Shiite proxies to engage in war.

    Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh was also quoted by the ISNA agency as stating, ďThe reason we designed our missiles with a range of 2000 km is to be able to hit our enemy the Zionist regime from a safe distance.Ē

    Iran has increased its short and medium-range ballistic missiles, and currently has the largest ballistic missile stockpile in the Middle East.

    But what will Obamaís response to these threats be? Most likely there would be more bowing to the ruling clerics of Iran and giving them more carrots.

    This is a basic rule in Iranís politics and in Iran supreme leaderís philosophy: concessions means weakness. Once someone shows you his/her weakness, you have to speed up getting more concessions until there is nothing is left to get out of them.

    Here is a chain of events that can help us understand how we got here with Iran, and to project how President Obama and the White House will respond to Iranís recent aggression and threat to the US, Israel and other countries in the region.

    When the nuclear negotiations were initiated, Obama announced his terms. Iranís supreme leader, Khamenei, gave an inflammatory speech, lashing out at the US. Obamaís response was to increase the number of centrifuges that Iran can hold and give Tehran more leverage in uranium enrichment.

    https://english.alarabiya.net/en/vie...red-lines.html
    Dispite our best intentions, the system is dysfunctional that intelligence failure is guaranteed.
    Russ Travers, CIA analyst, 2001

  • #2
    how is this
    A Obamas fault
    B Any thing new
    you think you a real "bleep" solders you "bleep" plastic solders don't wory i will make you in to real "bleep" solders!! "bleep" plastic solders

    CPO Mzinyati

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by andrewza View Post
      how is this
      A Obamas fault
      B Any thing new
      A. His caving in to all of their demands for a treaty no matter what, even bypassing the Senate approval of such.
      B. Oppressive Governments like Iran only respect strength. Look how quickly they released the embassy hostages when Regan was elected. Like Carter, Obama projects nothing but weakness.
      ďBreaking News,Ē

      ďSomething irrelevant in your life just happened and now we are going to blow it all out of proportion for days to keep you distracted from what's really going on.Ē

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by andrewza View Post
        how is this
        A Obamas fault
        B Any thing new
        He made the deal with Iran. It's called the Obama Doctrine.
        Just as Bush was held responsible for what happened on his watch, so should Obama be held responsible for his actions.
        Dispite our best intentions, the system is dysfunctional that intelligence failure is guaranteed.
        Russ Travers, CIA analyst, 2001

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Urban hermit View Post
          He made the deal with Iran. It's called the Obama Doctrine.
          Just as Bush was held responsible for what happened on his watch, so should Obama be held responsible for his actions.
          And it should be noted that Bush let Iran get away with an awful lot as well.
          ALL LIVES SPLATTER!

          BLACK JEEPS MATTER!

          BLACK MOTORCYCLES MATTER!

          Comment


          • #6
            So did Ronnie. We would've cheerfully followed orders to turn that place into glass. I remember the barracks talk and no one blanched at that thought.
            Credo quia absurdum.


            Quantum mechanics describes nature as absurd from the point of view of common sense. And yet it fully agrees with experiment. So I hope you can accept nature as She is - absurd! - Richard Feynman

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Urban hermit View Post
              ...
              Just as Bush was held responsible for what happened on his watch, so should Obama be held responsible for his actions.
              You RACIST!!!

              "Why is the Rum gone?"

              -Captain Jack

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Urban hermit View Post
                Obama has really goofed things up...

                There used to be a time when the Islamic Republic showed some discretion with regards to its regional hegemonic and ideological ambitions, as well as breaching international laws. At least the ruling clerics of Iran were more covert about these issues.

                But not anymore.

                Iranís discretion was limited to the period before the nuclear deal was reached between P5+1 and the Islamic Republic, and before President Obama began pursuing appeasement policies with the ruling clerics.

                Currently, Iranís blatant aggression and provocative attitude has reached an unprecedented level, ranging from launching ballistic missiles in the middle of the day, to publicly supporting Bashar Al Assad, militarily and financially, and galvanizing the Shiite proxies to engage in war.

                Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh was also quoted by the ISNA agency as stating, ďThe reason we designed our missiles with a range of 2000 km is to be able to hit our enemy the Zionist regime from a safe distance.Ē

                Iran has increased its short and medium-range ballistic missiles, and currently has the largest ballistic missile stockpile in the Middle East.

                But what will Obamaís response to these threats be? Most likely there would be more bowing to the ruling clerics of Iran and giving them more carrots.

                This is a basic rule in Iranís politics and in Iran supreme leaderís philosophy: concessions means weakness. Once someone shows you his/her weakness, you have to speed up getting more concessions until there is nothing is left to get out of them.

                Here is a chain of events that can help us understand how we got here with Iran, and to project how President Obama and the White House will respond to Iranís recent aggression and threat to the US, Israel and other countries in the region.

                When the nuclear negotiations were initiated, Obama announced his terms. Iranís supreme leader, Khamenei, gave an inflammatory speech, lashing out at the US. Obamaís response was to increase the number of centrifuges that Iran can hold and give Tehran more leverage in uranium enrichment.

                https://english.alarabiya.net/en/vie...red-lines.html
                Given that Israel is a a lot less than 1200 miles away from Iran, the paranoid idiocy is plain for all to see. Iran wishes to hold its threat over all of the Middle East and the vital oil pipelines to Russia, and to be able to threated American forces over a huge area.

                Ironically, when Japan threatened to destroy us, we dropped two atomic bombs on them. When Iran threatened to destroy us, Obama gave them atomic bombs.

                The American Closet Muslim came out long ago, and he's not on our side.
                Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by The Exorcist View Post
                  You RACIST!!!

                  But of course!
                  Dispite our best intentions, the system is dysfunctional that intelligence failure is guaranteed.
                  Russ Travers, CIA analyst, 2001

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by SRV Ron View Post
                    A. His caving in to all of their demands for a treaty no matter what, even bypassing the Senate approval of such.
                    B. Oppressive Governments like Iran only respect strength. Look how quickly they released the embassy hostages when Regan was elected. Like Carter, Obama projects nothing but weakness.
                    Regan sold weapons to Iran. Iran is very good at the game far better than USA.
                    you think you a real "bleep" solders you "bleep" plastic solders don't wory i will make you in to real "bleep" solders!! "bleep" plastic solders

                    CPO Mzinyati

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                      Given that Israel is a a lot less than 1200 miles away from Iran, the paranoid idiocy is plain for all to see. Iran wishes to hold its threat over all of the Middle East and the vital oil pipelines to Russia, and to be able to threated American forces over a huge area.

                      Ironically, when Japan threatened to destroy us, we dropped two atomic bombs on them. When Iran threatened to destroy us, Obama gave them atomic bombs.

                      The American Closet Muslim came out long ago, and he's not on our side.
                      OKAY, Israel is less than 1200 miles away from Iran.

                      How is that our problem?
                      "Ask not what your country can do for you"

                      Left wing, Right Wing same bird that they are killing.

                      youíre entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Iran has no need to worry about the red lines. Obama doesn't even know where they are anyway
                        Don't waste your time always searching for those wasted years...

                        Comment

                        Latest Topics

                        Collapse

                        Working...
                        X