Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sciientists Ask Obama To Use Anti-Mafia Laws Against Climate Critics

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    As Mr. Owl would say, let's find out.

    Jagadish Shukla, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA: On the IPCC, shared a Nobel Peace prize with Al Gore.

    Edward Maibach, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA: Dr. Maibach holds a BA in social psychology from University of California at San Diego (1980), an MPH in health promotion from San Diego State University (1983), and a PhD in communication research from Stanford University (1990).

    Has zero knowledge or background in climate change as a field of study.

    Paul Dirmeyer, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA: He's a meteorologist. That is, he's highly qualified to be the "weatherman" on the six o'clock news...

    Ph.D. in Meteorology, December 1992, University of Maryland at College Park. Dissertation title: GCM Studies of the Influence of Vegetation on the General Circulation: The Role of Albedo in Modulating Climate Change.

    M.S. in Meteorology, December 1988, University of Maryland at College Park. Thesis title: Stationary Solutions in a One-Layer Spectral Model.

    B.S. in Meteorology (Magna Cum Laude), May 1986, Texas A&M University.

    [...]
    Most climate scientists are meteorologists or atmospheric scientists by academic background. The fact that professors of climate change communication, ecologists, psychologists, economists and other non-scientists are often referred to as climate scientists is almost as outrageous as this RICO bullschist.

    The "funny thing" is that meteorologists are the second most skeptical group of scientists regarding Gorebal Warming. Only geologists are more skeptical.

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/03/1...mate-paradigm/


    Watts Up With That? | The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by wolfhnd View Post
      How many of these people are Marxist?
      All of them are Enviromarxists, Gorebots or the word I promised not to use anymore because some people are offended by all words ending in -tard...
      A (AKA greenhadist, [email protected], greent*rd, greenturd) is a scientifically illiterate person whose capacities for logic, rationality and basic arithmetic have been slowed, diminished or totally eliminated by a quasi-religious devotion to saving the environment from its own natural variability.

      A Gorebot is scientist or scientifically literate person who never learned or forgot how to employ Chamberlin's Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses. They simply follow ruling theories which generally assume that humans cause all observations since 1850.

      An Enviromarxist views environmental issues as excuses to steal private property and push redistributive policies.
      Enviromarxism

      Enviromarxism is an economic system in which capital is replaced by [email protected] economic metrics like EROEI, “green jobs,” Social Cost of Carbon or Inclusive Wealth Index.

      [...]

      https://debunkhouse.wordpress.com/enviromarxism/

      enviromarxist

      One who uses environmentalism as the rationale for government control of the economy.

      http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...=enviromarxist
      Watts Up With That? | The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
        I have felt for some time, and have said so repeatedly on this forum, that if we continue on our present course, civil war will be inevitable.
        So, who do you plan on fighting or rebelling against?

        And if so, are you prepared for the consequences of treason?
        We are not now that strength which in old days
        Moved earth and heaven; that which we are we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts
        Made weak by time and fate but strong in will
        To strive to seek to find and not to yield.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Massena View Post
          So, who do you plan on fighting or rebelling against?
          Leviathan?

          Originally posted by Massena
          And if so, are you prepared for the consequences of treason?
          It's not treason; it's the right of revolution... provided it's a successful revolution.
          Watts Up With That? | The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change.

          Comment


          • #20
            Obama did not create an intelligencia that despises Common sense and has the moral compass of a Pimp.

            Indeed, it was the other way around.
            "Why is the Rum gone?"

            -Captain Jack

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Massena View Post
              So, who do you plan on fighting or rebelling against?

              And if so, are you prepared for the consequences of treason?
              Screw that noise. If things got that bad, it's time to pull up roots and move away. My ancestors did it more than once, after all.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by The Doctor View Post
                Most climate scientists are meteorologists or atmospheric scientists by academic background. The fact that professors of climate change communication, ecologists, psychologists, economists and other non-scientists are often referred to as climate scientists is almost as outrageous as this RICO bullschist.

                The "funny thing" is that meteorologists are the second most skeptical group of scientists regarding Gorebal Warming. Only geologists are more skeptical.

                http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/03/1...mate-paradigm/


                Problem is that you're losing the PR campaign there. The average citizen believes what they're told by "experts" in a field they have no knowledge or interest in, and the numbers who believe in global warming are certainly high.

                Maybe you'd be better off convincing people that you're right, rather than expecting them to convince themselves?

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
                  As Mr. Owl would say, let's find out.

                  Jagadish Shukla, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA: On the IPCC, shared a Nobel Peace prize with Al Gore.

                  Edward Maibach, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA: Dr. Maibach holds a BA in social psychology from University of California at San Diego (1980), an MPH in health promotion from San Diego State University (1983), and a PhD in communication research from Stanford University (1990).

                  Has zero knowledge or background in climate change as a field of study.

                  Paul Dirmeyer, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA: He's a meteorologist. That is, he's highly qualified to be the "weatherman" on the six o'clock news...

                  Ph.D. in Meteorology, December 1992, University of Maryland at College Park. Dissertation title: GCM Studies of the Influence of Vegetation on the General Circulation: The Role of Albedo in Modulating Climate Change.

                  M.S. in Meteorology, December 1988, University of Maryland at College Park. Thesis title: Stationary Solutions in a One-Layer Spectral Model.

                  B.S. in Meteorology (Magna Cum Laude), May 1986, Texas A&M University.

                  Barry Klinger, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA: Oceanographer with a very thin resume.

                  S.B., Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), 1985
                  Ph.D., Physical Oceanography, MIT-Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, March, 1992.
                  Doctoral Thesis:Eddy generation at a convex corner by a coastal current in a rotating system. Faculty advisor: Dr. J. A. Whitehead

                  Paul Schopf, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA: No background in climate or climate change:

                  Paul Schopf is the Associate Dean for Research and Computing in the George Mason University's College of Science. He received his Ph.D. in Geophysicl Fluid Dynamics from Princeton, and spent 19 years at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center developing coupled ocean-atmosphere models for climate, before joing the Climate Dynamics faculty at Mason in 1997. He has had extensive experience with supercomputing, serving on source evaluation boards for NASA, user advisory committees, and has seved as the chair of the Earth System Modeling Framework Advisory Board.

                  David Straus, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA: David A. Kravitz is a Professor in the School of Business at George Mason University

                  Another know-nothing on the science of climate.

                  All of the above are part of something called "Rearchgate" which has to do with e-mails and such showing that they were engaged in intellectual fraud and dishonest research on the climate with other climate researchers. Whether that is true or not I leave to others.

                  Edward Sarachik, University of Washington, Seattle, WA: An actual climate scientist!

                  Ph.D., Brandeis University
                  Atmospheric dynamics; large-scale atmosphere-ocean interactions; greenhouse warming; equatorial dynamics; El Niño/Southern Oscillation; climate change.

                  Michael Wallace, University of Washington, Seattle, WA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Michael_Wallace

                  At least he's a climate scientist...

                  Alan Robock, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ: Another weather guesser. PhD in meteorology.

                  Eugenia Kalnay, University of Maryland, College Park, MD: http://www.atmos.umd.edu/~ekalnay/ Another weather guesser.

                  William Lau, University of Maryland, College Park, MD: Apparently a weather guesser but not on the Faculty or staff of this college:

                  http://www.atmos.umd.edu/people/index.php#staff

                  Kevin Trenberth, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO: Another weather guesser

                  http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/staff/trenbert/cv.html

                  T.N. Krishnamurti, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL: Professor Emeritus and weather guesser.

                  Vasu Misra, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL: Nobody special...

                  http://coaps.fsu.edu/vasu-misra

                  Ben Kirtman, University of Miami, Miami, FL: Another nobody...

                  http://www.rsmas.miami.edu/people/fa...?p=ben-kirtman

                  Robert Dickinson, University of Texas, Austin, TX: Been around forever but... meh...
                  http://www.jsg.utexas.edu/researcher/robert_dickinson/

                  Michela Biasutti, Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY

                  Grossly under qualified...

                  http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~biasutti/

                  Mark Cane, Columbia University, New York, NY: Nothing of note here. A PhD nobody.

                  Lisa Goddard, Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY: Goddard holds a PhD in atmospheric and oceanic sciences from Princeton University and a BA in physics from the University of California at Berkeley.

                  Nothing of note in her work however.

                  Alan Betts, Atmospheric Research, Pittsford, VT: Has a great webpage.

                  http://alanbetts.com/about/

                  Anyway, no Communists or Socialists in that group. Rather, they are mainly a bunch of hack "scientists" and weather guessers that really haven't done anything of note other than predict with the accuracy of Jeane Dixon, noted psychic, that the weather changes.
                  You have to actually show how their work, credentials or positions are bollocks, it is not enough just to say so.
                  "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it"
                  G.B Shaw

                  "They promised us homes fit for heroes, they give us heroes fit for homes."
                  Grandad, Only Fools and Horses

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Daemon of Decay View Post
                    Problem is that you're losing the PR campaign there. The average citizen believes what they're told by "experts" in a field they have no knowledge or interest in, and the numbers who believe in global warming are certainly high.

                    Maybe you'd be better off convincing people that you're right, rather than expecting them to convince themselves?
                    More graphs?
                    "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it"
                    G.B Shaw

                    "They promised us homes fit for heroes, they give us heroes fit for homes."
                    Grandad, Only Fools and Horses

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Neither politics nor religion have ever had much emotional sway over me. Obviously I'm in the minority of people and I see bias everywhere which is just a reflection of my own personality defects. That said I don't understand how people get so wrapped up in their own world view not to consider the views of others.
                      We hunt the hunters

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Sergio View Post
                        You have to actually show how their work, credentials or positions are bollocks, it is not enough just to say so.
                        No I don't. It's up to you to do your homework just as I did. I'm not about to start writing biographical essays on each one of these people.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
                          No I don't. It's up to you to do your homework just as I did. I'm not about to start writing biographical essays on each one of these people.
                          Within reason I can agree with that - we should all be looking things up, it makes for more informed discussions. However, when you post a list of names and then claim that their research is nothing impressive or is flawed then it is not unreasonable to ask why.

                          And given how you regularly do this, i.e. making unsubstantiated and frequently disproved arguments, asking you to back up your claims also seems reasonable. A leftist and progressive trait no doubt.
                          "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it"
                          G.B Shaw

                          "They promised us homes fit for heroes, they give us heroes fit for homes."
                          Grandad, Only Fools and Horses

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            All these belong to the environment mafia :global warming is their living : the more global warming ,the better : it provides them millions and it strokes their ego and they suffer no opposition,after all they are Liberals whose aim is to make the live of other people intolerable .

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Sergio View Post
                              Within reason I can agree with that - we should all be looking things up, it makes for more informed discussions. However, when you post a list of names and then claim that their research is nothing impressive or is flawed then it is not unreasonable to ask why...
                              All those links weren't good enough?
                              "Why is the Rum gone?"

                              -Captain Jack

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Sergio View Post
                                Within reason I can agree with that - we should all be looking things up, it makes for more informed discussions. However, when you post a list of names and then claim that their research is nothing impressive or is flawed then it is not unreasonable to ask why.

                                And given how you regularly do this, i.e. making unsubstantiated and frequently disproved arguments, asking you to back up your claims also seems reasonable. A leftist and progressive trait no doubt.
                                It's obvious I looked them up. I did my homework and pronounced a verdict. You don't like the verdict. Well, that's too f'ing bad. Look them up for yourself and you'll see the same sort of crap research I found.

                                Comment

                                Latest Topics

                                Collapse

                                Working...
                                X