Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Benghazi

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Benghazi

    http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2...ly-distressing

    Wow......

  • #2

    Comment


    • #3
      Shrilary doesn't care and most Americans have already forgotten about Benghazi by this time.
      Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
        Shrilary doesn't care and most Americans have already forgotten about Benghazi by this time.
        I have not forgotten about the honorable Americans who died at Benghazi. I also recognize that Mrs Clinton is facing inappropriate treatment from some of the GOP folks irt Benghazi.


        Edit: the name is not Shilary, it is Hillary Clinton. Using the term Shrilary is akin to grade school bullying, a common tactic among some folks on the internet not only toward politicians but toward large groups of peaceful people.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
          Nicely done. A two year old video answering a story from Sept. 30 of this year. So I guess you're not going to address what McCarthy said at all. Typical right wing misdirection.
          Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by R. Evans View Post
            Nicely done. A two year old video answering a story from Sept. 30 of this year. So I guess you're not going to address what McCarthy said at all. Typical right wing misdirection.
            Hardly. Her answer at the time is as relevant now as it was then. She didn't give a $h!+ about those deaths. All she wanted was to make it clear she wasn't to blame for any of it.

            Which part of that is difficult to understand? Shrillary wouldn't take responsibility then and doesn't now. She wants Benghazi to just go away just like her major FU with the e-mail server.
            She doesn't and won't take responsibility for her failures or for her mistakes. That is the issue at hand.

            Would you want a President that has not just poor judgement but when their mistakes and failures become costly in lives and money is arrogant enough to dismiss all that as basically irrelevant? That is what Hillary does time and again. She has a long track record of that.

            The video is relevant.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Taieb el-Okbi View Post
              Edit: the name is not Shilary, it is Hillary Clinton. Using the term Shrilary is akin to grade school bullying, a common tactic among some folks on the internet not only toward politicians but toward large groups of peaceful people.
              Oh Brother! (SNIF SNIF)

              GG
              "The will of a section rooted in self interest, should not outweigh the vital interests of a whole people." -Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain-

              "Fanatics of any sort are dangerous." -GG-

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by R. Evans View Post
                Nicely done. A two year old video answering a story from Sept. 30 of this year. So I guess you're not going to address what McCarthy said at all. Typical right wing misdirection.
                McCarthy is suffering from foot in mouth disease. In his eagerness to gain Majority Speaker of The House he said things in a Sean Hannity interview that has been taken out of context by the writer of the article of the goofy Guardian.

                And what did Bengazi investigation two years ago have to do with her pitiful poll figures during the current campaign?

                She has no one to blame for herself for trying to cover things up. She has no one to blame but herself for endless lying. She has no one one to blame but herself for circumventing protocols about emails and mobile devices. She has no one to blame but herself for exchanging classified and secret emails through an unsecured device in a bathroom closet. She has no one to blame for lying about it had been approved. She has no one to blame but herself for claiming emails between Bill and her when he said he did not use email. She has no one to blame for being an arrogant badmouth bitch that thought she was smarter than the American people.

                As much as I dislike Obama, I will stand up and give him a thunderous applause for telling her that she should not have lied and that he could not and will not intervene.
                Last edited by Salinator; 06 Oct 15, 00:01.
                Flag: USA / Location: West Coast

                Prayers.

                BoRG

                http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/8757/snap1ws8.jpg

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PtsX_Z3CMU

                Comment


                • #9
                  Who pushed the video?
                  Too Much To Do Too Little Time

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by R. Evans View Post
                    Nicely done. A two year old video answering a story from Sept. 30 of this year. So I guess you're not going to address what McCarthy said at all. Typical right wing misdirection.
                    What McCarthy said...
                    Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she's untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened, had we not fought.

                    http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...utrage/408253/

                    If not for the select committee, the public would not know the facts about Clinton's incompetence and dishonesty regarding Benghazi.

                    Typical left wing ignorance of facts and gross dishonesty. McCarthy never said that the purpose of the committee was to torpedo Clinton's campaign. McCarthy's mistake was in wording his statement in such a way that the left wing media could easily quote him out of context.

                    That said, the truth about Benghazi is only one small facet in Hillary's portfolio of dishonesty and incompetence and her free falling poll numbers.
                    Watts Up With That? | The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Paddybhoy View Post
                      Typical Grauniad bullschist...

                      Watts Up With That? | The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by The Doctor View Post
                        Typical Grauniad bullschist...


                        How so? The article is nothing more than quotes and background information, there is very little subjective content within it.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          This is actually written in English. Anyone with at least the reading comprehension of a bar of soap should be able to understand it.

                          The Grauniad did not report what McCarthy actually said.

                          What the Grauniad reported...
                          “And let me give you one example,” McCarthy said. “Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee. A select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping.?

                          What McCarthy actually said...
                          Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she's untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened, had we not fought.

                          http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...utrage/408253/

                          Are the Grauniad and the test of the leftwing media lying? Are they too stupid to understand what McCarthy said? Are they just too lazy to check out the facts? Or are they just parrots for Democrat talking points?

                          There are no other possibilities.
                          Last edited by The Doctor; 06 Oct 15, 06:23.
                          Watts Up With That? | The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by The Doctor View Post
                            So... You didn't actually read it? Or did you not bother to look for McCarthy's in-context statement?

                            The Grauniad did not report what McCarthy actually said.

                            What the Grauniad reported...
                            “And let me give you one example,” McCarthy said. “Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee. A select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping.?

                            What McCarthy actually said...
                            Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she's untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened, had we not fought.

                            http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...utrage/408253/

                            If not for the select committee, the public would not know the facts about Clinton's incompetence and dishonesty regarding Benghazi.

                            Typical left wing ignorance of facts and gross dishonesty. McCarthy never said that the purpose of the committee was to torpedo Clinton's campaign. McCarthy's only guilty of wording his statement in such a way that the left wing media could easily quote him out of context.
                            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8Wff2-IKkA">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8Wff2-IKkA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350">


                            'Let me give you one example'.

                            That is what he said, he contextualised that statement all by himself
                            Last edited by Paddybhoy; 06 Oct 15, 06:36.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Paddybhoy View Post
                              [YOUTUBEKevin McCarthy: Benghazi Committee Tanked Hillary's Poll Numbers[/YOUTUBE]

                              'Let me give you one example'.

                              That is what he said, he contextualised that statement all by himself

                              This is actually written in English. Anyone with at least the reading comprehension of a bar of soap should be able to understand it.

                              The Grauniad did not report what McCarthy actually said.

                              What the Grauniad reported...
                              “And let me give you one example,” McCarthy said. “Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee. A select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping.?

                              What McCarthy actually said...
                              Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she's untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened, had we not fought.

                              http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/...utrage/408253/

                              Are the Grauniad and the rest of the leftwing media lying? Are they too stupid to understand what McCarthy said? Are they just too lazy to check out the facts? Or are they just parrots for Democrat talking points?

                              There are no other possibilities.
                              Watts Up With That? | The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change.

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              Working...
                              X