Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Baltimore Prosecutor Wants t Block the Results of the Gray Autopsy...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Baltimore Prosecutor Wants t Block the Results of the Gray Autopsy...

    Another shocker...

    http://video.foxnews.com/v/427534548...#sp=show-clips
    We are not now that strength which in old days
    Moved earth and heaven; that which we are we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts
    Made weak by time and fate but strong in will
    To strive to seek to find and not to yield.

  • #2
    Of course Mosby is hiding something. Her case is weak against the majority of the officers charged and she's figured that out. So, cover up, hide evidence, and hope like hell you can get a conviction somehow.

    Comment


    • #3
      She's definitely got something to hide, or else she would have released it first to support her alleged case.

      Well...won't take long for someone to leak the report and we'll know what's in it.
      Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

      Comment


      • #4
        Be rather embarrassing for her if the claim of self-inflicted injury is borne out by the autopsy...
        Any man can hold his place when the bands play and women throw flowers; it is when the enemy presses close and metal shears through the ranks that one can acertain which are soldiers, and which are not.

        Comment


        • #5
          More that embarrassing...career ending. She can be sued for wrongful arrest, slander, libel and a number of other things, including damages to the careers of the officers charged.
          Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
            More that embarrassing...career ending. She can be sued for wrongful arrest, slander, libel and a number of other things, including damages to the careers of the officers charged.
            The legal term is 'defamation' which covers both slander and libel. And yes she can if she if found to be hiding evidence.

            If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck...

            Sincerely,
            M
            We are not now that strength which in old days
            Moved earth and heaven; that which we are we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts
            Made weak by time and fate but strong in will
            To strive to seek to find and not to yield.

            Comment


            • #7
              More on the Gray autopsy report:

              http://video.foxnews.com/v/427655701...#sp=show-clips
              We are not now that strength which in old days
              Moved earth and heaven; that which we are we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts
              Made weak by time and fate but strong in will
              To strive to seek to find and not to yield.

              Comment


              • #8
                One alternative explanation is that Baltimore already seems to be the wild west right now and perhaps she is afraid for further incitement, but it seems unlikely. Much more likely would be a report that doesn't support her public posture.

                How does she get to do this? Is there no disclosure obligation owed to the Defence?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by lynelhutz View Post
                  One alternative explanation is that Baltimore already seems to be the wild west right now and perhaps she is afraid for further incitement, but it seems unlikely. Much more likely would be a report that doesn't support her public posture.

                  How does she get to do this? Is there no disclosure obligation owed to the Defence?
                  One thing about this woman is that she has no qualms about inciting the population whatsoever.

                  Yes, disclosure is mandatory, and refusal to do so could lead to her losing the case.

                  There is one possibility - if the report discloses an unrelated condition which could cause the family unnecessary distress if publicized; i.e., if he were HIV positive, for example. I doubt that to be the case, however; I suspect that the report is damaging to her case.
                  Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                    . . . . Yes, disclosure is mandatory, and refusal to do so could lead to her losing the case. . . . .
                    That would be the least of it. Deliberately withholding exculpatory evidence can result in a dismissal, a dressing down from a judge, or time in stir and disbarment. I for one think disbarment should be a far more common penalty for withholding evidence. Incidence of withholding is so common that police and prosecutors must think the penalty non-existent, so perhaps they'll reconsider that view when significant numbers of their colleagues are busted out of the legal profession.
                    I was married for two ******* years! Hell would be like Club Med! - Sam Kinison

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Not everything is black and white; sometimes it's Gray. ...sorry, couldn't resist...

                      Comment

                      Latest Topics

                      Collapse

                      Working...
                      X