Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Obama Seeking Revenge Against Israel?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is Obama Seeking Revenge Against Israel?

    President Obama is angry with Israeli voters for re-electing Benjamin Netanyahu, and he’s willing to risk the lives and security of Israeli citizens to show it.
    The State Department is reportedly considering reversing the decades-long policy of protecting Israel’s security at the United Nations and is threatening to allow the Security Council to compel Israel to enter forced negotiations with Hamas-controlled Palestine.
    This action would be reckless—and shameful. At a time when anti-Semitic attacks are rocking Europe, and the need for a secure, Jewish state has rarely been more apparent, the Obama administration would force Israel to negotiate with entities that have sworn to wipe it off the map.
    The unity government between the Palestinian Authority and Hamas is a sham. Hamas is controlling Gaza and would likely control all Palestinian territories if the Palestinian Authority would permit a vote. Even if Israel were forced to deal with the Palestinian Authority, this deal would have no impact on Hamas—and it may even enhance Hamas’s power.
    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/...tcmp=obnetwork
    Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

  • #2
    Is Obama Seeking Revenge Against Israel?

    One doesn't tell the Emperor he has no clothes.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Martok View Post
      Is Obama Seeking Revenge Against Israel?

      One doesn't tell the Emperor he has no clothes.
      My worst jump story:
      My 13th jump was on the 13th day of the month, aircraft number 013.
      As recorded on my DA Form 1307 Individual Jump Log.
      No lie.

      ~
      "Everything looks all right. Have a good jump, eh."
      -2 Commando Jumpmaster

      Comment


      • #4
        Revenge? Nah. Siding nearly totally with the Palestinians, yes. It's like his position with the OAS on the Falklands. Obama the Ignorant has been siding with Argentina rather than Britain.

        Obama the Ignorant has no moral compass. He has too regularly picked America's enemies, the dysfunctional losers, and states with an axe to grind over friends, stable nations, and winners.

        In sort he's a social / political idiot.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
          Revenge? Nah. Siding nearly totally with the Palestinians, yes. It's like his position with the OAS on the Falklands. Obama the Ignorant has been siding with Argentina rather than Britain.

          Obama the Ignorant has no moral compass. He has too regularly picked America's enemies, the dysfunctional losers, and states with an axe to grind over friends, stable nations, and winners.

          In sort he's a social / political idiot.
          I would not go so far as claiming he's an idiot for the above (though the policies are idiocies), but would merely point out that his world view is very different from that of most Americans. In Obama's world view Western (white) colonialists are primarily responsible for the world's/America's ailments. White America long oppressed the black man, and in Obama's view to bring the Black Man up the White Man must be brought down, and the tables turned. The same goes for western Europeans. They are the enemy. Christianity (and Judaism) is the evil doer and Islam the victim. The wealthy man oppresses the poor. Etc etc. I would also say he is a believer in Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, but Liberty and Fraternity can be road blocks (in his eyes) to achieving Equality, so to Obama they are dispensable, and like most leftists (and he is a leftist even by Euro standards) believe that the ends justify the means.

          Is he out to "destroy America?" In a sense he is, although he may see it as "remaking America." He does stand against what most Americans (Republican Democrat white or black) believe America stands for, but too many people (because they knew nothing of him) turned a (color) blind eye to him as they view(ed) him in the light of their own imagination, and for not what he actually is.
          Last edited by Cyan67; 20 Mar 15, 21:00.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Cyan67 View Post
            I would not go so far as claiming he's an idiot for the above (though the policies are idiocies), but would merely point out that his world view is very different from that of most Americans. In Obama's world view Western (white) colonialists are primarily responsible for the world's/America's ailments. White America long oppressed the black man, and in Obama's view to bring the Black Man up the White Man must be brought down, and the tables turned. The same goes for western Europeans. They are the enemy. Christianity (and Judaism) is the evil doer and Islam the victim. The wealthy man oppresses the poor. Etc etc. I would also say he is a believer in Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, but Liberty and Fraternity can be road blocks (in his eyes) to achieving Equality, so to Obama they are dispensable, and like most leftists (and he is a leftist even by Euro standards) believe that the ends justify the means.

            Is he out to "destroy America?" In a sense he is, although he may see it as "remaking America." He does stand against what most Americans (Republican Democrat white or black) believe America stands for, but too many people (because they knew nothing of him) turned a (color) blind eye to him as they view(ed) him in the light of their own imagination, and for not what he actually is.
            And, that is an idiot's view of America. It shows a complete lack of understanding of history and a tenuous grasp of reality. It denies that on the plus side those same groups that are being vilified above got us to the Electronics Revolution and the largesse we have today.
            The Dances with Wolves / The Color Purple narratives and the like are fiction and nothing more.

            Yes, Obama the Ignorant is a firm believer in "Social and Economic Justice" as the Left uses those terms. It is just Socialism / Communism light when you get right down to it.

            http://www.cesj.org/learn/definition...ocial-justice/

            One definition of justice is “giving to each what he or she is due.” The problem is knowing what is “due”.
            Where have we heard that before?

            This is like repackaging a turd as a candy bar and saying it tastes fine now that it has a chocolate coating. The Left couldn't get straight up Socialism and Communism to work so they relabeled it and are trying to sell it as "New and Improved!"

            Comment


            • #7
              IOW, "same old S, different package". Twenty years of listening to Jeremy Wright screaming "Hate Whitey" rotted his brain."
              Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post

                This is like repackaging a turd as a candy bar and saying it tastes fine now that it has a chocolate coating. The Left couldn't get straight up Socialism and Communism to work so they relabeled it and are trying to sell it as "New and Improved!"
                Just like they now call themselves 'progressive'...

                I just wish that people would wake up and see reality...
                Credo quia absurdum.


                Quantum mechanics describes nature as absurd from the point of view of common sense. And yet it fully agrees with experiment. So I hope you can accept nature as She is - absurd! - Richard Feynman

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                  IOW, "same old S, different package". Twenty years of listening to Jeremy Wright screaming "Hate Whitey" rotted his brain."
                  Yep.
                  Credo quia absurdum.


                  Quantum mechanics describes nature as absurd from the point of view of common sense. And yet it fully agrees with experiment. So I hope you can accept nature as She is - absurd! - Richard Feynman

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    It’s not a matter of hate…it’s a matter of self-interest.

                    I love Pat Buchanan’s piece on what Eisenhower would have done regarding Israel and the Middle East. He says that the Eisenhower administration would have done a cost-benefit analysis of what our relationship with Israel will cost us and would have determined that it is not worth maintaining it.

                    http://www.theamericanconservative.c...eisenhower-do/
                    Homo homini lupus

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Cyan67 View Post
                      I would not go so far as claiming he's an idiot for the above (though the policies are idiocies), but would merely point out that his world view is very different from that of most Americans. In Obama's world view Western (white) colonialists are primarily responsible for the world's/America's ailments. White America long oppressed the black man, and in Obama's view to bring the Black Man up the White Man must be brought down, and the tables turned. The same goes for western Europeans. They are the enemy. Christianity (and Judaism) is the evil doer and Islam the victim. The wealthy man oppresses the poor. Etc etc. I would also say he is a believer in Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, but Liberty and Fraternity can be road blocks (in his eyes) to achieving Equality, so to Obama they are dispensable, and like most leftists (and he is a leftist even by Euro standards) believe that the ends justify the means.

                      Is he out to "destroy America?" In a sense he is, although he may see it as "remaking America." He does stand against what most Americans (Republican Democrat white or black) believe America stands for, but too many people (because they knew nothing of him) turned a (color) blind eye to him as they view(ed) him in the light of their own imagination, and for not what he actually is.
                      Voter ignorance, white guilt, and wussy Republican candidates got him elected twice.
                      “I do not wish to have the slave emancipated because I love him, but because I hate his master."
                      --Salmon P. Chase

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Jannie View Post
                        It’s not a matter of hate…it’s a matter of self-interest.

                        I love Pat Buchanan’s piece on what Eisenhower would have done regarding Israel and the Middle East. He says that the Eisenhower administration would have done a cost-benefit analysis of what our relationship with Israel will cost us and would have determined that it is not worth maintaining it.

                        http://www.theamericanconservative.c...eisenhower-do/
                        Thank God Almighty we didn't take that route.
                        “I do not wish to have the slave emancipated because I love him, but because I hate his master."
                        --Salmon P. Chase

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Jannie View Post
                          It’s not a matter of hate…it’s a matter of self-interest.

                          I love Pat Buchanan’s piece on what Eisenhower would have done regarding Israel and the Middle East. He says that the Eisenhower administration would have done a cost-benefit analysis of what our relationship with Israel will cost us and would have determined that it is not worth maintaining it.

                          http://www.theamericanconservative.c...eisenhower-do/
                          I agree with the first concept of the analysis, but disagree that Eisenhower would have concluded that it "would not have been worth it."

                          Eisenhower was smart enough to understand the need for a strong ally in the middle of enemy territory.
                          Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Who is watching the watchers?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Jannie View Post
                            It’s not a matter of hate…it’s a matter of self-interest.

                            I love Pat Buchanan’s piece on what Eisenhower would have done regarding Israel and the Middle East. He says that the Eisenhower administration would have done a cost-benefit analysis of what our relationship with Israel will cost us and would have determined that it is not worth maintaining it.

                            http://www.theamericanconservative.c...eisenhower-do/
                            Pat must have one hell of a ouija board...

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Obama favors the Palestinians and not the Israelis. He has no foreign policy, at least not anything that could be recognized as one, and the Middle East is in a much worse state than it was in January 2009 when he took office.

                              The current negotiations with Iran are a good indicator of his opinion of Israel, as is how he treated Netanyahu when he came to the United States by invitation.

                              If Obama reverses US support for Israel in the UN, as is being rumored, then there is going to be a very large problem which the next president will have to address.

                              Sincerely,
                              M
                              We are not now that strength which in old days
                              Moved earth and heaven; that which we are we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts
                              Made weak by time and fate but strong in will
                              To strive to seek to find and not to yield.

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              Working...
                              X