Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rammer Jammer!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    It's an effort like handing out buckets to try and keep the Titanic from sinking.

    The ACA has already torpedoed US health insurance and will in time sink US health care along with it.
    Remember to thank a Democrat for doing that.
    Insurance companies are making money hand over fist with the ACA in force. What reality do you get your news from? They were and are one of its biggest supporters.
    “The time has come,” the Walrus said,
    “To talk of many things:
    Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
    Of cabbages—and kings—
    And why the sea is boiling hot—
    And whether pigs have wings.”
    ― Lewis Carroll

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Combat Engineer View Post
      Why would keep believing in a campaign wooden for a candidate I did not vote or a program, ACA, that I opposed? However I understand politics and there is no chance of repeal absent a SCOTUS decision gutting the fed subsidies.

      One can always hope.
      Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedy. -- Ernest Benn

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Tsar View Post
        One can always hope.
        Actually that possibility has the GOP members that are not ideologs sweating bullets already. That decision leaves voters in mostly red run states with the entire bill while blue state voters would still receive them. GOP just formed a group of House committee chairmen to look at what they can do to prepare.
        “The time has come,” the Walrus said,
        “To talk of many things:
        Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
        Of cabbages—and kings—
        And why the sea is boiling hot—
        And whether pigs have wings.”
        ― Lewis Carroll

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Combat Engineer View Post
          Actually that possibility has the GOP members that are not ideologs sweating bullets already. That decision leaves voters in mostly red run states with the entire bill while blue state voters would still receive them. GOP just formed a group of House committee chairmen to look at what they can do to prepare.
          That is already the case in a good bit of the red states as many of them did not agree to accept the subsidies.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Combat Engineer View Post
            Actually that possibility has the GOP members that are not ideologs sweating bullets already. That decision leaves voters in mostly red run states with the entire bill while blue state voters would still receive them. GOP just formed a group of House committee chairmen to look at what they can do to prepare.

            Why do you always feel the need to **** on one’s cornflakes?
            Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedy. -- Ernest Benn

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Tsar View Post
              Why do you always feel the need to **** on one’s cornflakes?
              It's a discussion board, posting relevant information is what one does in a discussion group. As opposed to regurgitating the latest Fox News story.
              “The time has come,” the Walrus said,
              “To talk of many things:
              Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
              Of cabbages—and kings—
              And why the sea is boiling hot—
              And whether pigs have wings.”
              ― Lewis Carroll

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by BigDog View Post
                That is already the case in a good bit of the red states as many of them did not agree to accept the subsidies.
                The subsides under consideration by the SCOTUS are not those ones you're posting about. Those are the subsidies that States receive if they adopt the new ACA medicaid programs. The ones under review by the SCOTUS are the ones individuals get to help pay for the policy they buy through the federal exchange. The ones bought through State exchanges are not in question.
                “The time has come,” the Walrus said,
                “To talk of many things:
                Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
                Of cabbages—and kings—
                And why the sea is boiling hot—
                And whether pigs have wings.”
                ― Lewis Carroll

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Combat Engineer View Post
                  It's a discussion board, posting relevant information is what one does in a discussion group. As opposed to regurgitating the latest Fox News story.
                  Fox News? Wouldn’t know I never watch it.
                  Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedy. -- Ernest Benn

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Tsar View Post
                    Fox News? Wouldn’t know I never watch it.
                    Neither do I. However MM and others post about a dozen links a week as tread starters posted to this topic, which was what I was referring to.
                    “The time has come,” the Walrus said,
                    “To talk of many things:
                    Of shoes—and ships—and sealing-wax—
                    Of cabbages—and kings—
                    And why the sea is boiling hot—
                    And whether pigs have wings.”
                    ― Lewis Carroll

                    Comment

                    Latest Topics

                    Collapse

                    Working...
                    X