Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

11.07 Genocide in Srebrenica

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 11.07 Genocide in Srebrenica

    This event will stay a big stain on the face of UN.
    They didnt protect those people in a demilitarized zone.
    I ve read few books where authors included some testimonies of the survivals. Just horibble event on the european ground.

    Havent we said, never again !?


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Srebrenica_massacre

  • #2
    There was no genocide, but a mass murder. And Srebenica is not an isolated case .There were a lot of mass murders before and after WWII .
    Besides, it is totally dishonest to compare Srebenica with what happened in WWII.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Daud View Post
      ()
      Havent we said, never again !?
      On average twice each century, since Roman times, it's called Old Europe for a reason

      This event will stay a big stain on the face of UN.
      Well at least in former Yugoslavia they did *something*, that style of UN "Peacekeeping" died in Somalia and Ruanda and seems to be gone now.
      High Admiral Snowy, Commander In Chief of the Naval Forces of The Phoenix Confederation.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by ljadw View Post
        There was no genocide, but a mass murder. And Srebenica is not an isolated case .There were a lot of mass murders before and after WWII .
        Besides, it is totally dishonest to compare Srebenica with what happened in WWII.
        Just because russians vetoed it doesnt mean that it wasnt a genocide. After Montenegro and Macedonia, Bosnia is a new battlegroud of NATO and Russia


        https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-resolution-un

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Snowygerry View Post

          On average twice each century, since Roman times, it's called Old Europe for a reason



          Well at least in former Yugoslavia they did *something*, that style of UN "Peacekeeping" died in Somalia and Ruanda and seems to be gone now.
          It happened to those who believed that they would be protected by so called UN "soldiers", better say tourists.

          https://youtu.be/JrogdksBquQ​​​​​​


          You can rely only on your own rifle and your hands.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Daud View Post

            Just because russians vetoed it doesnt mean that it wasnt a genocide. After Montenegro and Macedonia, Bosnia is a new battlegroud of NATO and Russia


            https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-resolution-un
            The Serbs murdered some 8000 Muslim men, BUT they spared the women : that means that Srebrenica was not a genocide .A genocide is an attempt to exterminate a group of persons, As the women were spared, there was no attempt to exterminate the Muslims of Srebrenica .

            The word genocide has become victim to a verbal inflation and is now dangerously commonplace, as the word fascist .
            If Srebrenica was a genocide, than was Christchurch also a genocide, the same for the Easter massacres in Sri Lanka, the massacres in Indonesia in 1965, the massacres in Sudan, in Biafra, in Syria, ........
            And what about the White Genocide, the Killing Fields,.....?
            Last edited by ljadw; 12 Jul 19, 00:37.

            Comment


            • #7
              Are you saying the Serbs killed some 8000 Men and did not touch the women?

              Pruitt
              Pruitt, you are truly an expert! Kelt06

              Have you been struck by the jawbone of an ASS lately?

              by Khepesh "This is the logic of Pruitt"

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Pruitt View Post
                Are you saying the Serbs killed some 8000 Men and did not touch the women?

                Pruitt
                I am saying that the women , a number of whom were raped, but rape is no genocide, were deported outside of Srebrenica and were not murdered .

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by ljadw View Post

                  The Serbs murdered some 8000 Muslim men, BUT they spared the women : that means that Srebrenica was not a genocide .A genocide is an attempt to exterminate a group of persons, As the women were spared, there was no attempt to exterminate the Muslims of Srebrenica .

                  The word genocide has become victim to a verbal inflation and is now dangerously commonplace, as the word fascist .
                  If Srebrenica was a genocide, than was Christchurch also a genocide, the same for the Easter massacres in Sri Lanka, the massacres in Indonesia in 1965, the massacres in Sudan, in Biafra, in Syria, ........
                  And what about the White Genocide, the Killing Fields,.....?
                  So you think that Serbia didnt want to push their border to west ?

                  read:

                  THE HAGUE (Reuters) - Former Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic was convicted by U.N. judges of genocide for the 1995 Srebrenica massacre, the worst war crime in Europe since World War Two, and sentenced to 40 years in prison.


                  Attached Files

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    That Serbia wanted (or not ) to push its border to the west,is totally irrelevant for the question if the Srebrenica killins were a genocide or not .

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by ljadw View Post
                      That Serbia wanted (or not ) to push its border to the west,is totally irrelevant for the question if the Srebrenica killins were a genocide or not .
                      You should know when to stop.

                      You said:

                      A genocide is an attempt to exterminate a group of persons,


                      They did it in order to area that is ethnic clean. Now even in democratic/secular society they can take everything by election because they re majority in those places - even try to separate from Bosnia. Lets say, self-determination.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Daud View Post

                        You should know when to stop.

                        You said:

                        A genocide is an attempt to exterminate a group of persons,


                        They did it in order to area that is ethnic clean. Now even in democratic/secular society they can take everything by election because they re majority in those places - even try to separate from Bosnia. Lets say, self-determination.
                        They killed male adult Muslims,this is not an attempt to kill all Muslims : thus,it is not a genocide .

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Again.
                          Definitions of genocide.
                          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide_definitions
                          "For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there you will long to return"

                          Comment

                          Latest Topics

                          Collapse

                          Working...
                          X